Skip to content
Updated September 2026

Nexen N Fera Sport SUV review

The Nexen N Fera Sport SUV receives a highly critical assessment from this user, who reports significant premature failure and structural degradation. The experience highlights a severe lack of durability and performance consistency, leading to a strong recommendation against the product for premium vehicle applications.

Relative score
51/100
tests + owners
Owner reviews
10/100
1 review
Road tests
77/100
3 published tests

Owners rate it 66.8 points lower than the instrumented road tests do — see the two score breakdowns below for where they disagree.

Nexen N Fera Sport SUV
Scores

Two scoring systems, side by side

Owner scores come from reviews on retailer and review sites; road-test scores come from instrumented tests. Where they disagree, it is usually a discipline owners rarely push to the limit.

By owner reviews

10%
Would buy again 10%
Comfort
Overall comfort
10%
Treadwear
Overall treadwear
10%
Handling
Overall handling
10%

By road tests

76.8%
Dry
87.2%
Wet
90.5%
Comfort
55.9%
Noise
73.4%
From owners

What owners like and dislike

Themes extracted from 1 owner review across retailers and review sites.

The Nexen N Fera Sport SUV receives a highly critical assessment from this user, who reports significant premature failure and structural degradation. The experience highlights a severe lack of durability and performance consistency, leading to a strong recommendation against the product for premium vehicle applications.

Cons

  • Extremely poor tread life and structural integrity
  • Severe vibration issues developing at low mileage
  • Unacceptable performance for premium or high-value vehicles

Worth knowing

  • Users operating high-torque electric vehicles like the Kia EV6 report significant premature failure and vibration issues.
  • The presence of road noise suppression foam did not prevent the structural failure of the tire casing.
Test results

3 published test appearances

Placement within each field. Open a test for the discipline-by-discipline result.

2025 Teknikens Varld Summer tire Test · 235/55 R19

5th of 8
Best: Wet Braking · 2nd Weakest: Wet Handling · 6th
DisciplinePlacementField position
Wet Braking2nd of 8
Wet Handling6th of 8
Dry Braking6th of 8
Subj. Comfort4th of 8

2023 Best SUV tires Tested · 225/65 R17

10th of 12
Best: Noise · 2nd Weakest: Rolling Resistance · 11th
DisciplinePlacementField position
Wet Braking7th of 12
Wet Handling9th of 12
Dry Braking3rd of 12
Dry Handling9th of 12
Rolling Resistance11th of 12
Straight Aqua8th of 12
Noise2nd of 12
Price2nd of 12
Dirt Handling11th of 12
Sand Traction7th of 12
Grass Traction6th of 12
Mud Traction9th of 12

2022 AutoBild SUV 4x4 Summer tire Test · 235/55 R18

7th of 10
Best: Straight Aqua · 1st Weakest: Rolling Resistance · 9th
DisciplinePlacementField position
Wet Braking6th of 10
Wet Handling4th of 10
Dry Braking6th of 10
Dry Handling8th of 10
Rolling Resistance9th of 10
Straight Aqua1st of 10
Noise5th of 10
Price2nd of 10
Gravel Handling6th of 10
Gravel Traction5th of 10
Sand Traction7th of 10
Grass Traction8th of 10
Mud Traction3rd of 10