Skip to content
Summer tire Summer Premium Touring tires Updated May 2026

Nokian Line SUV review

The Nokian Line SUV receives a polarized reception, characterized by high initial performance in handling and comfort that often degrades significantly over time. While some users appreciate the tire's grip and efficiency, a recurring consensus points to premature tread wear, structural integrity issues, and a notable increase in noise and vibration as the tire ages.

Relative score
66/100
tests + owners
Owner reviews
65/100
9 reviews
Road tests
80/100
1 published test

Owners rate it 15 points lower than the instrumented road tests do — see the two score breakdowns below for where they disagree.

Nokian Line SUV
Scores

Two scoring systems, side by side

Owner scores come from reviews on retailer and review sites; road-test scores come from instrumented tests. Where they disagree, it is usually a discipline owners rarely push to the limit.

By owner reviews

65%
Would buy again 39%
Dry
Overall dry
80%
Corner stability
80%
Dry traction
82%
Steering response
78%
Wet
Overall wet
74%
Wet traction
82%
Comfort
Overall comfort
68%
Treadwear
Overall treadwear
46%
Handling
Overall handling
74%

By road tests

80%
Dry Braking
73.3%
Dry Handling
73.3%
Subj. Dry Handling
73.3%
Wet Braking
86.7%
Wet Handling
86.7%
Straight Aquaplaning
86.7%
Curved Aquaplaning
86.7%
Side G-Force on Wet surface
86.7%
Inside Noise level
73.3%
Rolling Resistance
60%
Wear
80%
From owners

What owners like and dislike

Themes extracted from 9 owner reviews across retailers and review sites.

The Nokian Line SUV receives a polarized reception, characterized by high initial performance in handling and comfort that often degrades significantly over time. While some users appreciate the tire's grip and efficiency, a recurring consensus points to premature tread wear, structural integrity issues, and a notable increase in noise and vibration as the tire ages.

Pros

  • Strong initial dry and wet handling performance
  • Low rolling resistance contributing to fuel efficiency
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality when new
  • Improved braking distances compared to some premium competitors

Cons

  • Rapid and uneven tread wear
  • Structural failures including tires becoming 'out of round' or oval
  • Significant increase in road noise and harshness over time
  • Poor performance in winter or snow conditions despite SUV branding
  • Durability issues such as cracking between grooves

Worth knowing

  • Users with heavier SUVs, such as the Mitsubishi Outlander and Pajero Sport, reported significant suspension stress and rapid wear.
  • Volvo XC70 owners reported better noise suppression and safety compared to other premium brands, suggesting performance may vary by vehicle chassis tuning.
Test results

1 published test appearance

Placement within each field. Open a test for the discipline-by-discipline result.

2017 ADAC SUV Summer tire Test

4th of 15
Best: Straight Aquaplaning · 3rd Weakest: Rolling Resistance · 7th
DisciplinePlacementField position
Dry Handling5th of 15
Subj. Dry Handling5th of 15
Dry Braking5th of 15
Straight Aquaplaning3rd of 15
Curved Aquaplaning3rd of 15
Wet Braking3rd of 15
Wet Handling3rd of 15
Side G-Force on Wet surface3rd of 15
Rolling Resistance7th of 15
Inside Noise level5th of 15
Wear4th of 15