Skip to content
Updated September 2026

Nokian Snowproof 2 SUV review

The Nokian Snowproof 2 SUV is highly regarded for its exceptional performance in challenging winter conditions, particularly on snow, slush, and wet surfaces. Users consistently praise its stability and handling precision, noting that the reinforced sidewall construction provides a driving experience that rivals summer tires in terms of responsiveness.

Relative score
83/100
tests + owners
Owner reviews
88/100
4 reviews
Road tests
80/100
3 published tests
Nokian Snowproof 2 SUV
Scores

Two scoring systems, side by side

Owner scores come from reviews on retailer and review sites; road-test scores come from instrumented tests. Where they disagree, it is usually a discipline owners rarely push to the limit.

By owner reviews

88%
Would buy again 93%
Dry
Overall dry
93%
Wet
Overall wet
95%
Snow & ice
Overall snow & ice
93%
Comfort
Overall comfort
83%
Treadwear
Overall treadwear
78%
Handling
Overall handling
90%

By road tests

80.3%
Dry
83.4%
Wet
88.1%
Snow
75.9%
Comfort
95.6%
Noise
61.9%
From owners

What owners like and dislike

Themes extracted from 4 owner reviews across retailers and review sites.

The Nokian Snowproof 2 SUV is highly regarded for its exceptional performance in challenging winter conditions, particularly on snow, slush, and wet surfaces. Users consistently praise its stability and handling precision, noting that the reinforced sidewall construction provides a driving experience that rivals summer tires in terms of responsiveness.

Pros

  • Outstanding traction and control in deep snow and slush
  • Excellent wet weather performance and hydroplaning resistance
  • Precise handling and reduced body roll due to reinforced sidewalls
  • Good tread wear longevity for a winter-specific tire

Cons

  • Noticeable increase in fuel consumption
  • Mixed feedback regarding overall noise levels and comfort
  • Higher price point compared to some competitors

Worth knowing

  • Drivers of heavier SUVs, such as the Volvo XC60, report high confidence in stability during high-speed highway driving in inclement weather.
  • The aramid-reinforced sidewall is specifically highlighted as a major benefit for SUV owners concerned with puncture resistance and handling dynamics.
Test results

3 published test appearances

Placement within each field. Open a test for the discipline-by-discipline result.

2025 Autobild SUV Winter tire Test · 235/50 R 19

8th of 11
Best: Straight Aqua · 1st Weakest: Snow Traction · 11th
DisciplinePlacementField position
Wet Braking9th of 11
Wet Handling7th of 11
Wet Circle7th of 11
Dry Braking10th of 11
Dry Handling9th of 11
Snow Braking9th of 11
Snow Traction11th of 11
Snow Handling10th of 11
Rolling Resistance3rd of 11
Straight Aqua1st of 11
Curved Aquaplaning1st of 11
Noise2nd of 11

2024 AS SUV Winter tire Test · 235/55 R18

9th of 10
Best: Rolling Resistance · 6th Weakest: Wet Braking · 10th
DisciplinePlacementField position
Wet Braking10th of 10
Wet Handling8th of 10
Dry Braking9th of 10
Dry Handling7th of 10
Snow Braking10th of 10
Snow Traction9th of 10
Snow Handling8th of 10
Rolling Resistance6th of 10
Straight Aqua8th of 10
Noise6th of 10

2023 Tyre Reviews SUV Winter tire Test · 235/60 R18

5th of 9
Best: Straight Aqua · 1st Weakest: Noise · 8th
DisciplinePlacementField position
Wet Handling7th of 9
Dry Handling7th of 9
Snow Traction6th of 9
Snow Handling6th of 9
Rolling Resistance6th of 9
Straight Aqua1st of 9
Curved Aquaplaning1st of 9
Subj. Comfort3rd of 9
Noise8th of 9