Skip to content
Winter tire Winter Ultra High Performance tires Updated September 2026

Nokian WR A4 review

The Nokian WR A4 is widely regarded as a highly capable winter tire that excels in dry and wet conditions, often outperforming competitors in stability and noise levels. While most users praise its snow traction and longevity, a minority of drivers report issues with sidewall softness and handling precision at high speeds on specific vehicle setups.

Relative score
77/100
tests + owners
Owner reviews
81/100
23 reviews
Road tests
72/100
3 published tests

Owners rate it 8.6 points higher than the instrumented road tests do — see the two score breakdowns below for where they disagree.

Nokian WR A4
Scores

Two scoring systems, side by side

Owner scores come from reviews on retailer and review sites; road-test scores come from instrumented tests. Where they disagree, it is usually a discipline owners rarely push to the limit.

By owner reviews

81%
Would buy again 83%
Dry
Overall dry
85%
Corner stability
79%
Dry traction
84%
Steering response
86%
Wet
Overall wet
88%
Wet traction
89%
Snow & ice
Overall snow & ice
89%
Ice
75%
Comfort
Overall comfort
85%
Treadwear
Overall treadwear
78%
Handling
Overall handling
78%

By road tests

72.4%
Dry
86.3%
Wet
68.3%
Snow
73.7%
Noise
58.3%
By discipline (% of best in test)
Dry Braking
54.8%
Dry Handling
46.1%
Wet Braking
29.5%
Wet Handling
26.6%
Straight Aquaplaning
12%
Snow Braking
46.4%
Snow Handling
36.8%
Snow Traction
50%
Inside Noise level
46.6%
Rolling Resistance
90.5%
Price
38.2%
Wear
20%
From owners

What owners like and dislike

Themes extracted from 23 owner reviews across retailers and review sites.

The Nokian WR A4 is widely regarded as a highly capable winter tire that excels in dry and wet conditions, often outperforming competitors in stability and noise levels. While most users praise its snow traction and longevity, a minority of drivers report issues with sidewall softness and handling precision at high speeds on specific vehicle setups.

Pros

  • Exceptional dry and wet road handling for a winter tire
  • Impressive longevity and tread wear resistance
  • Low road noise levels, often quieter than summer tires
  • Strong traction in snow and slushy conditions

Cons

  • Potential for sidewall flex or softness on certain vehicle/rim combinations
  • Occasional reports of vibration or increased braking distance on dry pavement
  • Mixed performance on pure ice compared to studded alternatives

Worth knowing

  • Users with RWD vehicles frequently report high satisfaction with snow climbing capabilities.
  • Drivers with low-profile, wide tire configurations (e.g., 19-inch rims) occasionally report handling instability or 'drifting' at highway speeds due to sidewall deflection.
Test results

3 published test appearances

Placement within each field. Open a test for the discipline-by-discipline result.

2020 Auto Bild Performance Winter tire Test · 245/45 R18

17th of 20
Best: Total Cost of Ownership · 2nd Weakest: Snow Handling · 19th
DisciplinePlacementField position
Wet Braking11th of 20
Wet Handling14th of 20
Dry Braking10th of 20
Dry Handling8th of 20
Snow Braking17th of 20
Snow Traction11th of 20
Snow Handling19th of 20
Rolling Resistance3rd of 20
Straight Aqua18th of 20
Noise6th of 20
Value13th of 20
Wear17th of 20
Total Cost of Ownership2nd of 20

2020 Winter tire Market Overview - 52 tire Braking Test · 245/45 R18

12th of 48
Best: Wet Braking · 12th Weakest: Snow Braking · 20th
DisciplinePlacementField position
Wet Braking12th of 48
Snow Braking20th of 48

2019 19 Inch Performance Winter tire Test · 255/35 R19

10th of 11
Best: Rolling Resistance · 3rd Weakest: Wet Braking · 11th
DisciplinePlacementField position
Wet Braking11th of 11
Wet Handling10th of 11
Dry Braking6th of 11
Dry Handling9th of 11
Snow Braking4th of 11
Snow Handling6th of 11
Rolling Resistance3rd of 11
Straight Aqua11th of 11
Noise10th of 11
Price8th of 11