Skip to content
Winter tire Winter Premium Touring tires Updated September 2026

Nokian WR D4 review

The Nokian WR D4 is widely regarded as a high-performance winter tire that excels in deep snow and cold-weather traction, offering a quiet and comfortable ride. While many users praise its value and snow-handling capabilities, a significant portion of the user base reports concerns regarding premature tread wear and the structural integrity of the tire's edges over time.

Relative score
78/100
tests + owners
Owner reviews
79/100
72 reviews
Road tests
73/100
10 published tests
Nokian WR D4
Scores

Two scoring systems, side by side

Owner scores come from reviews on retailer and review sites; road-test scores come from instrumented tests. Where they disagree, it is usually a discipline owners rarely push to the limit.

By owner reviews

79%
Would buy again 74%
Dry
Overall dry
82%
Corner stability
79%
Dry traction
84%
Steering response
80%
Wet
Overall wet
82%
Wet traction
84%
Snow & ice
Overall snow & ice
91%
Ice
79%
Comfort
Overall comfort
83%
Treadwear
Overall treadwear
68%
Handling
Overall handling
79%

By road tests

73%
Dry
89.7%
Wet
78.8%
Snow
82.8%
Noise
73.1%
By discipline (% of best in test)
Dry Braking
67.1%
Dry Handling
67.1%
Subj. Dry Handling
67.1%
Wet Braking
60%
Wet Handling
60%
Straight Aquaplaning
60%
Curved Aquaplaning
60%
Side G-Force on Wet surface
60%
Snow Braking
89.2%
Snow Handling
89.2%
Snow Traction
89.2%
Ice Braking
95%
Ice Handling
95%
Inside Noise level
74.6%
Outside Noise
70.8%
Rolling Resistance
81.7%
Wear
82.1%
From owners

What owners like and dislike

Themes extracted from 72 owner reviews across retailers and review sites.

The Nokian WR D4 is widely regarded as a high-performance winter tire that excels in deep snow and cold-weather traction, offering a quiet and comfortable ride. While many users praise its value and snow-handling capabilities, a significant portion of the user base reports concerns regarding premature tread wear and the structural integrity of the tire's edges over time.

Pros

  • Exceptional traction and confidence in deep snow and slush
  • Very low road noise and high levels of ride comfort
  • Strong fuel efficiency and low rolling resistance
  • Excellent price-to-performance ratio compared to premium competitors

Cons

  • Rapid and uneven tread wear, including reports of chunks falling off
  • Inconsistent performance in wet conditions, with some users reporting poor grip
  • Soft compound is prone to damage if used in temperatures above 10-15°C
  • Occasional reports of lateral instability and vague steering feedback

Worth knowing

  • Users with high-torque FWD vehicles frequently noted wheel spin and difficulty putting power down on wet or dry surfaces.
  • Drivers using the tire in mild climates or during warmer shoulder seasons reported significantly faster degradation and 'chunking' of the tread blocks.
  • Some users observed that adjusting tire pressure slightly higher than factory recommendations helped mitigate vague steering feel and improved responsiveness.
Test results

10 published test appearances

Placement within each field. Open a test for the discipline-by-discipline result.

2019 ADAC 185/65 R15 Winter tire Test · 185/65 R15

10th of 16
DisciplinePlacementField position

2018 AMS Winter tire Test · 205/55 R16

3rd of 11
Best: Rolling Resistance · 1st Weakest: Dry Handling · 9th
DisciplinePlacementField position
Wet Braking7th of 11
Wet Handling8th of 11
Dry Braking4th of 11
Dry Handling9th of 11
Snow Braking2nd of 11
Snow Handling3rd of 11
Rolling Resistance1st of 11
Straight Aqua6th of 11
Noise8th of 11
Price6th of 11

2018 Auto Express Winter tire Test · 205/55 R16

7th of 9
DisciplinePlacementField position

2018 ACE All Season and Winter tire Test · 185/65 R15

3rd of 12
DisciplinePlacementField position

2018 Auto Bild Winter tire Test · 195/65 R15

9th of 20
Best: Rolling Resistance · 1st Weakest: Wet Braking · 18th
DisciplinePlacementField position
Wet Braking18th of 20
Wet Handling16th of 20
Dry Braking2nd of 20
Dry Handling14th of 20
Snow Braking7th of 20
Snow Handling2nd of 20
Rolling Resistance1st of 20
Straight Aqua16th of 20
Noise11th of 20
Value9th of 20
Price14th of 20
Wear5th of 20
Total Cost of Ownership1st of 20

2018 ADAC Winter tire Test - 175/65 R14 · 175/65 R14

4th of 12
DisciplinePlacementField position

2018 ADAC Winter tire Test - 205/55 R16 · 205/55 R16

10th of 16
DisciplinePlacementField position

2018 51 Winter tire Shootout · 195/65 R15

14th of 51
DisciplinePlacementField position

2017 ADAC SUV Winter tire Test - 215/65 R16

4th of 16
Best: Snow Braking · 1st Weakest: Rolling Resistance · 6th
DisciplinePlacementField position
Dry Handling5th of 16
Subj. Dry Handling5th of 16
Dry Braking5th of 16
Straight Aquaplaning5th of 16
Curved Aquaplaning5th of 16
Wet Braking5th of 16
Wet Handling5th of 16
Side G-Force on Wet surface5th of 16
Snow Braking1st of 16
Snow Traction1st of 16
Snow Handling1st of 16
Ice Braking2nd of 16
Ice Handling2nd of 16
Rolling Resistance6th of 16
Inside Noise level3rd of 16
Wear4th of 16

2017 ADAC Winter tire Test - 195/65 R15

11th of 16
Best: Snow Braking · 1st Weakest: Straight Aquaplaning · 9th
DisciplinePlacementField position
Dry Handling5th of 16
Subj. Dry Handling5th of 16
Dry Braking5th of 16
Straight Aquaplaning9th of 16
Curved Aquaplaning9th of 16
Wet Braking9th of 16
Wet Handling9th of 16
Side G-Force on Wet surface9th of 16
Snow Braking1st of 16
Snow Traction1st of 16
Snow Handling1st of 16
Ice Braking2nd of 16
Ice Handling2nd of 16
Rolling Resistance3rd of 16
Inside Noise level7th of 16
Wear4th of 16