Skip to content
All-season tire All Season Premium Touring tires Updated September 2026

Nokian WR G4 SUV review

The Nokian WR G4 SUV is widely regarded as a highly capable all-weather tire that excels in diverse conditions, particularly in rain, slush, and light-to-moderate snow. While many users praise its ability to eliminate the need for dedicated winter tires, a segment of the user base reports significant concerns regarding premature tread wear and inconsistent performance in extreme icy conditions.

Relative score
84/100
tests + owners
Owner reviews
86/100
31 reviews
Road tests
67/100
1 published test

Owners rate it 19.1 points higher than the instrumented road tests do — see the two score breakdowns below for where they disagree.

Nokian WR G4 SUV
Scores

Two scoring systems, side by side

Owner scores come from reviews on retailer and review sites; road-test scores come from instrumented tests. Where they disagree, it is usually a discipline owners rarely push to the limit.

By owner reviews

85.6%
Would buy again 57%
Dry
Overall dry
93.7%
Corner stability
87%
Dry traction
90%
Steering response
60%
Wet
Overall wet
91.5%
Wet traction
93%
Snow & ice
Overall snow & ice
98.2%
Ice
70%
Comfort
Overall comfort
83.7%
Noise
Overall noise
84%
Treadwear
Overall treadwear
81%
Handling
Overall handling
77%

By road tests

66.5%
Snow
53.7%
From owners

What owners like and dislike

Themes extracted from 31 owner reviews across retailers and review sites.

The Nokian WR G4 SUV is widely regarded as a highly capable all-weather tire that excels in diverse conditions, particularly in rain, slush, and light-to-moderate snow. While many users praise its ability to eliminate the need for dedicated winter tires, a segment of the user base reports significant concerns regarding premature tread wear and inconsistent performance in extreme icy conditions.

Pros

  • Exceptional traction in wet, slushy, and snowy conditions.
  • Strong alternative to dedicated winter tires for moderate climates.
  • Predictable handling and stability across varied road surfaces.
  • Generally comfortable ride quality for an all-weather tire.

Cons

  • Reports of premature tread wear and shorter-than-expected lifespan.
  • Increased road noise, particularly as the tread wears down.
  • Inconsistent performance on pure ice compared to dedicated winter tires.
  • Occasional reports of 'mushy' steering feedback or handling characteristics.

Worth knowing

  • Users on heavier vehicles, such as full-size trucks and SUVs, report faster tread wear and occasional cabin drone.
  • Drivers of smaller crossovers and sedans (e.g., Honda CR-V, Civic) frequently report high satisfaction with the tire's year-round versatility.
  • Tesla Model X owners noted a break-in period where initial road noise was higher than OEM tires before settling.
Test results

1 published test appearance

Placement within each field. Open a test for the discipline-by-discipline result.

Nokian Outpost nAT vs Hakkapeliitta R5 vs WRG4 vs One · 265/65 R17

2nd of 4
DisciplinePlacementField position
Snow Traction2nd of 4
Snow Handling2nd of 4