Pace AZURA Pace review
The Pace Azura presents a polarizing user experience, often categorized as a budget-friendly option that delivers inconsistent longevity and performance. While some owners report impressive mileage and value, others cite significant concerns regarding premature tread wear, increased road noise over time, and diminished grip in wet conditions.
Two scoring systems, side by side
Owner scores come from reviews on retailer and review sites; road-test scores come from instrumented tests. Where they disagree, it is usually a discipline owners rarely push to the limit.
By owner reviews
68%What owners like and dislike
Themes extracted from 6 owner reviews across retailers and review sites.
The Pace Azura presents a polarizing user experience, often categorized as a budget-friendly option that delivers inconsistent longevity and performance. While some owners report impressive mileage and value, others cite significant concerns regarding premature tread wear, increased road noise over time, and diminished grip in wet conditions.
Pros
- High value-for-money proposition
- Competitive longevity for some users
- Acceptable dry road handling for daily commuting
Cons
- Significant increase in road noise as the tire ages
- Noticeable decline in wet and dry grip after 20,000 miles
- Reports of premature shoulder wear and structural integrity issues
- Inconsistent tread life across different driving styles
Worth knowing
- Mitsubishi Outlander owners noted that maintaining specific tire pressures (34psi) is critical to preventing rapid shoulder wear on XL-rated variants.
- Users of mid-sized SUVs like the Nissan Qashqai reported high satisfaction with long-term durability, suggesting the tire may perform better on lighter crossover platforms.