Point S Summerstar 2 review
The Point S Summerstar 2 receives a predominantly negative reception from users, characterized by significant concerns regarding handling stability, wet-weather traction, and structural reliability. While a minority of owners appreciate the tire for its low price point and suitability for basic commuting or MOT compliance, the consensus highlights a lack of confidence in its performance and safety.
Two scoring systems, side by side
Owner scores come from reviews on retailer and review sites; road-test scores come from instrumented tests. Where they disagree, it is usually a discipline owners rarely push to the limit.
By owner reviews
49%What owners like and dislike
Themes extracted from 9 owner reviews across retailers and review sites.
The Point S Summerstar 2 receives a predominantly negative reception from users, characterized by significant concerns regarding handling stability, wet-weather traction, and structural reliability. While a minority of owners appreciate the tire for its low price point and suitability for basic commuting or MOT compliance, the consensus highlights a lack of confidence in its performance and safety.
Pros
- Affordable price point
- Acceptable for basic, low-demand commuting
- Adequate for passing vehicle inspections (MOT)
- Comfortable ride quality in specific motorway conditions
Cons
- Poor wet-weather grip and high risk of aquaplaning
- Excessive road noise and whining sounds
- Unstable handling and vague steering feedback
- Concerns regarding structural integrity and premature tread wear
- Soft sidewalls leading to deformation under load
Worth knowing
- Users reported significant noise issues on larger vehicles like the Vauxhall Insignia (245/45-18), making long-distance driving fatiguing.
- Drivers of smaller city cars, such as the Toyota Aygo, noted acceptable dry grip but highlighted severe traction issues during wet starts.
- Performance-oriented vehicles, such as the Mercedes C-Class AMG, experienced poor wet-weather handling and rapid wear.