Skip to content
Summer tire Summer High Performance tires Updated September 2026

Radar RPX800 review

The Radar RPX800 is widely regarded as a budget-friendly touring tire that excels in ride comfort and noise suppression, often outperforming premium brands in cabin quietness. However, users frequently report compromised handling dynamics, specifically noting a lack of sidewall stiffness and inconsistent wet-weather traction that can lead to unpredictable understeer.

Relative score
68/100
tests + owners
Owner reviews
67/100
6 reviews
Road tests
62/100
3 published tests
Radar RPX800
Scores

Two scoring systems, side by side

Owner scores come from reviews on retailer and review sites; road-test scores come from instrumented tests. Where they disagree, it is usually a discipline owners rarely push to the limit.

By owner reviews

67%
Would buy again 55%
Dry
Overall dry
75%
Corner stability
53%
Dry traction
75%
Steering response
68%
Wet
Overall wet
62%
Wet traction
62%
Comfort
Overall comfort
67%
Treadwear
Overall treadwear
88%
Handling
Overall handling
53%

By road tests

61.9%
Dry
47.5%
Wet
64.3%
By discipline (% of best in test)
Dry Braking
23.1%
Subj. Dry Handling
30.8%
Wet Braking
15.4%
Subj. Wet Handling
15.4%
Straight Aquaplaning
23.1%
From owners

What owners like and dislike

Themes extracted from 6 owner reviews across retailers and review sites.

The Radar RPX800 is widely regarded as a budget-friendly touring tire that excels in ride comfort and noise suppression, often outperforming premium brands in cabin quietness. However, users frequently report compromised handling dynamics, specifically noting a lack of sidewall stiffness and inconsistent wet-weather traction that can lead to unpredictable understeer.

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and road noise isolation
  • High tread longevity and mileage
  • Strong value proposition for budget-conscious drivers
  • Competent dry-weather performance for daily commuting

Cons

  • Inconsistent wet-weather grip and tendency to understeer
  • Soft sidewalls leading to poor cornering stability
  • Bouncy or 'greasy' handling characteristics during spirited driving
  • Noticeable nose-dive and body roll during stop-and-go maneuvers

Worth knowing

  • The tire's soft sidewall construction is highly praised for highway comfort but criticized for causing excessive body movement on hatchbacks and sedans.
  • Users noted that while the tire is suitable for relaxed city and motorway driving, it lacks the structural rigidity required for more dynamic or aggressive cornering.
Test results

3 published test appearances

Placement within each field. Open a test for the discipline-by-discipline result.

2023 ADAC Summer tire Test · 205/55 R16

43rd of 50
Best: Wet Braking · 19th Weakest: Abrasion · 48th
DisciplinePlacementField position
Wet Braking19th of 50
Dry Braking44th of 50
Straight Aqua39th of 50
Value35th of 50
Wear47th of 50
Fuel Consumption30th of 50
Abrasion48th of 50
Wet Braking - Concrete27th of 50

2021 53 Summer tire Braking Test · 205/55 R16

23rd of 53
Best: Wet Braking · 19th Weakest: Dry Braking · 40th
DisciplinePlacementField position
Wet Braking19th of 53
Dry Braking40th of 53

2019 Swedish Summer tire Test · 205/55 R16

12th of 13
Best: Dry Braking · 11th Weakest: Wet Braking · 12th
DisciplinePlacementField position
Wet Braking12th of 13
Dry Braking11th of 13
Straight Aqua11th of 13
Subj. Dry Handling11th of 13
Subj. Wet Handling12th of 13