Skip to content
Winter tire Winter Touring tires Updated May 2026

Sava Eskimo S3 review

The Sava Eskimo S3 is widely regarded as a specialized budget winter tire that excels in deep snow and ice conditions but shows significant performance limitations on wet pavement. While users consistently praise its exceptional value and longevity, many note that its wet-weather grip degrades noticeably as the tire ages, making it a polarizing choice for regions with milder, rain-heavy winters.

Relative score
73/100
tests + owners
Owner reviews
75/100
34 reviews
Road tests
24/100
3 published tests

Owners rate it 50.7 points higher than the instrumented road tests do — see the two score breakdowns below for where they disagree.

Sava Eskimo S3
Scores

Two scoring systems, side by side

Owner scores come from reviews on retailer and review sites; road-test scores come from instrumented tests. Where they disagree, it is usually a discipline owners rarely push to the limit.

By owner reviews

75%
Would buy again 75%
Dry
Overall dry
74%
Corner stability
71%
Dry traction
73%
Steering response
68%
Wet
Overall wet
65%
Wet traction
64%
Snow & ice
Overall snow & ice
91%
Ice
90%
Comfort
Overall comfort
71%
Treadwear
Overall treadwear
75%
Handling
Overall handling
70%

By road tests

24.3%
Dry Braking
50.7%
Dry Handling
50.7%
Subj. Dry Handling
50.7%
Wet Braking
54.2%
Wet Handling
54.2%
Straight Aquaplaning
54.2%
Curved Aquaplaning
54.2%
Side G-Force on Wet surface
54.2%
Snow Braking
87.5%
Snow Handling
87.5%
Snow Traction
87.5%
Ice Braking
93.1%
Ice Handling
93.1%
Inside Noise level
79.2%
Outside Noise
75%
Rolling Resistance
70.1%
Wear
91%
From owners

What owners like and dislike

Themes extracted from 34 owner reviews across retailers and review sites.

The Sava Eskimo S3 is widely regarded as a specialized budget winter tire that excels in deep snow and ice conditions but shows significant performance limitations on wet pavement. While users consistently praise its exceptional value and longevity, many note that its wet-weather grip degrades noticeably as the tire ages, making it a polarizing choice for regions with milder, rain-heavy winters.

Pros

  • Exceptional traction and handling in deep snow and ice
  • High value-for-money ratio
  • Excellent tread life and durability over multiple seasons
  • Reliable performance in sub-zero temperatures

Cons

  • Poor wet-weather braking and grip
  • Performance degradation on wet surfaces as the tire ages
  • Increased road noise at higher speeds
  • Soft sidewalls which can impact handling precision

Worth knowing

  • Users with lightweight vehicles, such as the Toyota Yaris, reported more predictable handling and fewer issues with wet-weather traction compared to heavier vehicles.
  • Drivers of mid-sized sedans like the VW Golf and Honda Accord noted that while the tire is capable, it is better suited for moderate driving styles rather than high-speed cornering.
Test results

3 published test appearances

Placement within each field. Open a test for the discipline-by-discipline result.

2019 ADAC 185/65 R15 Winter tire Test · 185/65 R15

14th of 16
DisciplinePlacementField position

2018 ADAC Winter tire Test - 175/65 R14 · 175/65 R14

8th of 12
DisciplinePlacementField position

2017 ADAC Winter tire Test - 195/65 R15

15th of 16
Best: Snow Braking · 2nd Weakest: Dry Handling · 8th
DisciplinePlacementField position
Wear3rd of 16
Dry Handling8th of 16
Subj. Dry Handling8th of 16
Dry Braking8th of 16
Straight Aquaplaning8th of 16
Curved Aquaplaning8th of 16
Wet Braking8th of 16
Wet Handling8th of 16
Snow Braking2nd of 16
Snow Traction2nd of 16
Snow Handling2nd of 16
Ice Braking2nd of 16
Ice Handling2nd of 16
Rolling Resistance6th of 16
Inside Noise level6th of 16
Side G-Force on Wet surface8th of 16