Skip to content
Summer tire Summer High Performance tires Updated September 2026

Sava intensa hp review

The Sava Intensa HP is a polarizing budget-tier tire that receives highly inconsistent feedback from users. While some drivers appreciate its affordability, longevity, and adequate performance for casual city commuting, a significant portion of users report severe safety concerns regarding wet-weather grip and soft sidewall stability during cornering.

Relative score
59/100
tests + owners
Owner reviews
50/100
25 reviews
Road tests
69/100
3 published tests

Owners rate it 18.9 points lower than the instrumented road tests do — see the two score breakdowns below for where they disagree.

Sava intensa hp
Scores

Two scoring systems, side by side

Owner scores come from reviews on retailer and review sites; road-test scores come from instrumented tests. Where they disagree, it is usually a discipline owners rarely push to the limit.

By owner reviews

50%
Would buy again 42%
Dry
Overall dry
58%
Corner stability
40%
Dry traction
58%
Steering response
45%
Wet
Overall wet
46%
Wet traction
46%
Comfort
Overall comfort
60%
Treadwear
Overall treadwear
61%
Handling
Overall handling
40%

By road tests

68.9%
Dry
45.1%
Wet
91.9%
By discipline (% of best in test)
Dry Braking
46.6%
Dry Handling
62.5%
Subj. Dry Handling
46.6%
Wet Braking
44.2%
Subj. Wet Handling
46.2%
Wet Handling
50%
Straight Aquaplaning
67.3%
Curved Aquaplaning
50%
Side G-Force on Wet surface
50%
Inside Noise level
75%
Rolling Resistance
75%
Wear
87.5%
From owners

What owners like and dislike

Themes extracted from 25 owner reviews across retailers and review sites.

The Sava Intensa HP is a polarizing budget-tier tire that receives highly inconsistent feedback from users. While some drivers appreciate its affordability, longevity, and adequate performance for casual city commuting, a significant portion of users report severe safety concerns regarding wet-weather grip and soft sidewall stability during cornering.

Pros

  • High value for money and low purchase price
  • Impressive tread longevity and durability for some users
  • Acceptable performance for low-speed, casual, or city driving
  • Improved fuel economy noted by some drivers

Cons

  • Dangerous lack of traction in wet conditions
  • Soft sidewalls leading to poor handling and vague steering feedback
  • Increased road noise as the tire ages
  • Inconsistent quality control and performance degradation over time

Worth knowing

  • Users with heavier or more powerful vehicles (e.g., 2.0 diesel engines) reported significant handling issues and lack of stability during spirited driving.
  • Drivers of smaller, lighter hatchbacks often found the tire adequate for city use, though some still noted poor wet-weather performance.
Test results

3 published test appearances

Placement within each field. Open a test for the discipline-by-discipline result.

2019 Swedish Summer tire Test · 205/55 R16

10th of 13
Best: Straight Aqua · 3rd Weakest: Dry Braking · 10th
DisciplinePlacementField position
Wet Braking9th of 13
Dry Braking10th of 13
Straight Aqua3rd of 13
Subj. Dry Handling10th of 13
Subj. Wet Handling8th of 13

2018 AutoBild Summer tire Overview · 195/65 R15

26th of 47
DisciplinePlacementField position

2017 ADAC 195/65 R15 Summer tire Test

12th of 16
Best: Wear · 3rd Weakest: Side G-Force on Wet surface · 9th
DisciplinePlacementField position
Dry Braking7th of 16
Wear3rd of 16
Inside Noise level5th of 16
Rolling Resistance5th of 16
Side G-Force on Wet surface9th of 16
Wet Handling9th of 16
Wet Braking9th of 16
Curved Aquaplaning9th of 16
Straight Aquaplaning9th of 16
Subj. Dry Handling7th of 16
Dry Handling7th of 16