Yokohama Geolandar M/T review
The Yokohama Geolandar M/T G003 is widely regarded as a top-tier mud-terrain tire that strikes an impressive balance between aggressive off-road capability and surprising on-road refinement. Users consistently praise its low noise levels and smooth handling, often noting it as a superior alternative to more expensive or louder competitors, though some report that it is not optimized for extremely sharp, rocky terrain or ice.
Two scoring systems, side by side
Owner scores come from reviews on retailer and review sites; road-test scores come from instrumented tests. Where they disagree, it is usually a discipline owners rarely push to the limit.
By owner reviews
90.8%What owners like and dislike
Themes extracted from 94 owner reviews across retailers and review sites.
The Yokohama Geolandar M/T G003 is widely regarded as a top-tier mud-terrain tire that strikes an impressive balance between aggressive off-road capability and surprising on-road refinement. Users consistently praise its low noise levels and smooth handling, often noting it as a superior alternative to more expensive or louder competitors, though some report that it is not optimized for extremely sharp, rocky terrain or ice.
Pros
- Exceptionally quiet and smooth ride for a mud-terrain tire
- Strong off-road traction in mud, dirt, and sand
- Excellent tread life and durability for daily-driven rigs
- Aggressive, aesthetically pleasing tread pattern
- High value-to-performance ratio compared to premium competitors
Cons
- Susceptible to chunking in extremely sharp, rocky terrain
- Reduced traction on ice and hard-packed snow
- Can feel slightly 'loose' or 'marshmallowy' on the highway compared to AT tires
- Potential for uneven wear if not rotated frequently
Worth knowing
- Users with high-torque diesel trucks report excellent grip and stability despite the power output.
- Some owners of 37-inch and 285/75r17 sizes noted that the tires may run slightly smaller than the advertised dimensions.
- Drivers of daily-commuter trucks appreciate the low noise levels, though some noted a slight decrease in fuel economy (approx. 1 MPG).