Skip to content
Summer tire Summer Max Performance tires Updated September 2026

Bridgestone Potenza S001 review

The Bridgestone Potenza S001 is a polarizing performance tire that excels in dry-weather handling and steering precision but frequently disappoints users regarding comfort and wet-weather confidence. While many drivers appreciate its stiff sidewalls and sporty feedback, a significant portion of the user base reports excessive road noise, rapid tread wear, and unpredictable traction in damp or cold conditions.

Relative score
72/100
tests + owners
Owner reviews
69/100
176 reviews
Road tests
73/100
5 published tests
Community sentiment Mixed Read the buzz
#Tread Wear and Longevity#Run-Flat Stiffness and Comfort#Road Noise and Harshness#Dry Grip and Stability#Quality and Cracking Issues
Bridgestone Potenza S001
Scores

Two scoring systems, side by side

Owner scores come from reviews on retailer and review sites; road-test scores come from instrumented tests. Where they disagree, it is usually a discipline owners rarely push to the limit.

By owner reviews

68.5%
Would buy again 56%
Dry
Overall dry
83.3%
Corner stability
76%
Dry traction
85%
Steering response
78%
Wet
Overall wet
69.6%
Wet traction
74%
Comfort
Overall comfort
61.1%
Treadwear
Overall treadwear
66.7%
Handling
Overall handling
74%
By source
DriverReviews92%5,612 reviews Tyre Reviews69%166 reviews Tire Rack60%10 reviews

By road tests

72.7%
Dry
83.2%
Wet
90.5%
Comfort
33.8%
Noise
80.1%
By discipline (% of best in test)
Dry Braking
75.4%
Dry Handling
62.9%
Subj. Dry Handling
90.6%
Wet Braking
64.1%
Subj. Wet Handling
75%
Wet Handling
64.6%
Straight Aquaplaning
67.1%
Curved Aquaplaning
43.8%
Side G-Force on Wet surface
43.8%
Inside Noise level
24.6%
Subjective Comfort
50%
Rolling Resistance
30.8%
Price
10%
Wear
71.9%
From owners

What owners like and dislike

Themes extracted from 176 owner reviews across retailers and review sites.

The Bridgestone Potenza S001 is a polarizing performance tire that excels in dry-weather handling and steering precision but frequently disappoints users regarding comfort and wet-weather confidence. While many drivers appreciate its stiff sidewalls and sporty feedback, a significant portion of the user base reports excessive road noise, rapid tread wear, and unpredictable traction in damp or cold conditions.

Pros

  • Excellent dry-weather grip and cornering stability.
  • Sharp, responsive steering feedback and turn-in precision.
  • Strong rim protection due to robust sidewall construction.
  • Predictable performance when pushed in warm, dry environments.

Cons

  • High levels of road noise and cabin drone, especially as the tire wears.
  • Poor wet-weather performance, with many reports of sudden traction loss and hydroplaning.
  • Rapid and uneven tread wear, often failing to meet mileage expectations.
  • Harsh ride quality, particularly on rough or uneven road surfaces.

Worth knowing

  • Owners of lightweight sports cars like the Mazda MX-5 frequently report that the tire feels too stiff and lacks the necessary wet-weather compliance for the chassis.
  • Drivers of high-torque vehicles (e.g., VW Golf GTI, BMW 340i) often note significant wheel spin and traction control intervention in the wet.
  • Users with 18-inch and 19-inch fitments frequently complain about the harshness and noise, noting that the tire transmits every road imperfection into the cabin.
Test results

5 published test appearances

Placement within each field. Open a test for the discipline-by-discipline result.

2020 Auto Bild Summer tire Test · 245/45 R18

11th of 20
Best: Wet Braking · 1st Weakest: Rolling Resistance · 20th
DisciplinePlacementField position
Wet Braking1st of 20
Wet Handling1st of 20
Dry Braking7th of 20
Dry Handling12th of 20
Rolling Resistance20th of 20
Straight Aqua7th of 20
Noise20th of 20
Value19th of 20
Price18th of 20
Wear12th of 20
Total Cost of Ownership20th of 20

2020 ADAC 18 Inch Summer tire Test · 225/40 R18

9th of 16
DisciplinePlacementField position
Wear12th of 16

2020 tire Market Overview Braking Test · 245/45 R18

3rd of 49
Best: Wet Braking · 1st Weakest: Dry Braking · 7th
DisciplinePlacementField position
Wet Braking1st of 49
Dry Braking7th of 49

2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP tire Test · 245/30 R20

5th of 8
Best: Straight Aqua · 2nd Weakest: Wet Braking · 8th
DisciplinePlacementField position
Wet Braking8th of 8
Wet Handling5th of 8
Dry Braking5th of 8
Dry Handling5th of 8
Rolling Resistance8th of 8
Straight Aqua2nd of 8
Subj. Dry Handling2nd of 8
Subj. Comfort5th of 8
Subj. Wet Handling3rd of 8
Noise8th of 8

2018 Auto Bild 20 inch UHP tire Test · 245/30 R20

6th of 8
Best: Straight Aqua · 3rd Weakest: Wet Braking · 7th
DisciplinePlacementField position
Wet Braking7th of 8
Wet Handling6th of 8
Dry Braking7th of 8
Dry Handling6th of 8
Rolling Resistance7th of 8
Straight Aqua3rd of 8
Noise6th of 8
Where to buy

Bridgestone Potenza S001 specs & sizes

Prices vary by size, so each one links out separately.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Community buzz

What owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of the scores above.

Community opinion on the Bridgestone Potenza S001 is divided, with some users praising their dry grip and stability, while many others criticize their rapid wear, stiffness (especially run-flat variants), noise, and cracking issues. Owners frequently compare them unfavorably to alternatives like Michelin or Pirelli, though budget-friendly deals tend to draw occasional interest.

Sentiment breakdown
Positive19%
Mixed31%
Negative50%
Top themes
#Tread Wear and Longevity#Run-Flat Stiffness and Comfort#Road Noise and Harshness#Dry Grip and Stability#Quality and Cracking Issues#Value and Deals

From 16 threads and comments.

Head-to-head

Bridgestone Potenza S001 compared

Compare any two