Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Bridgestone Potenza S001 vs Bridgestone Turanza T001 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | Potenza S001 | Turanza T001 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 83 | 78 |
| Tire Rack owners | 88 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 80 |
| SimpleTire owners | 80 | – |
| Dry Braking (% of best) | 96% | 95% |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | Potenza S001 | Turanza T001 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 91 | 100 |
| Tire Rack owners | 80 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 69 | 70 |
| SimpleTire owners | 80 | – |
| Wet Braking (% of best) | 100% | 100% |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | Potenza S001 | Turanza T001 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 34 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 80 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 60 | 72 |
| SimpleTire owners | 80 | – |
Noise
Why this score
| Source | Potenza S001 | Turanza T001 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 80 | – |
| SimpleTire owners | 80 | – |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | Potenza S001 | Turanza T001 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 62 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 67 | 63 |
| SimpleTire owners | 80 | – |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | Potenza S001 | Turanza T001 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 74 | 67 |
| DriverReviews owners | 84 | 84 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Potenza S001 | Bridgestone Turanza T001 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | 74 |
| Dry | 83 | 79 |
| Wet | 82 | 88 |
| Comfort | 45 | 72 |
| Noise | 80 | – |
| Treadwear | 67 | 63 |
| Handling | 74 | 67 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Tire A | Tire B | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 96% #5/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test | 95% #6/12 · 2018 Gute Fahrt Summer Tyre Test | +0.9 | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 100% #8/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test | 81% #10/12 · 2018 Gute Fahrt Summer Tyre Test | +19.1 | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 9% #11/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 20% #5/12 · 2018 Gute Fahrt Summer Tyre Test | -10.9 | Different tests |
| Straight Aqua | Straight | 97% #7/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 100% #1/12 · 2018 Gute Fahrt Summer Tyre Test | -3.3 | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 100% #1/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 100% #1/12 · 2018 Gute Fahrt Summer Tyre Test | 0 | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Potenza S001 is a polarizing performance tire that excels in dry-weather handling and steering precision but frequently disappoints users regarding comfort and wet-weather confidence. While many drivers appreciate its stiff sidewalls and sporty feedback, a significant portion of the user base reports excessive road noise, rapid tread wear, and unpredictable traction in damp or cold conditions.
Pros
- Excellent dry-weather grip and cornering stability.
- Sharp, responsive steering feedback and turn-in precision.
- Strong rim protection due to robust sidewall construction.
- Predictable performance when pushed in warm, dry environments.
Cons
- High levels of road noise and cabin drone, especially as the tire wears.
- Poor wet-weather performance, with many reports of sudden traction loss and hydroplaning.
- Rapid and uneven tread wear, often failing to meet mileage expectations.
- Harsh ride quality, particularly on rough or uneven road surfaces.
Observations
- Owners of lightweight sports cars like the Mazda MX-5 frequently report that the tire feels too stiff and lacks the necessary wet-weather compliance for the chassis.
- Drivers of high-torque vehicles (e.g., VW Golf GTI, BMW 340i) often note significant wheel spin and traction control intervention in the wet.
- Users with 18-inch and 19-inch fitments frequently complain about the harshness and noise, noting that the tire transmits every road imperfection into the cabin.
The Bridgestone Turanza T001 receives a polarized reception from users, often serving as a divisive factory-fitted tire. While many drivers appreciate its dry-weather handling, steering feedback, and comfort, a significant portion of the user base reports concerns regarding inconsistent wet-weather performance and premature tread wear.
Pros
- Solid dry-weather grip and handling
- Responsive steering feedback
- Generally comfortable ride quality
- Good value for money at certain price points
Cons
- Inconsistent or poor wet-weather traction and aquaplaning resistance
- Rapid and uneven tread wear reported by many users
- High road noise levels on certain surfaces
- Susceptibility to punctures and sidewall softness
Observations
- Users with FWD vehicles frequently report understeer and rapid front-tire wear compared to rear-axle longevity.
- Drivers of heavier vehicles or those with high-performance driving styles noted significantly lower mileage expectations than the tire's touring classification suggests.
- Some users on 17-inch and larger wheels noted that the tire's sidewall stiffness can lead to a harsh ride on imperfect road surfaces.
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Bridgestone Potenza S001
Community opinion on the Bridgestone Potenza S001 is divided, with some users praising their dry grip and stability, while many others criticize their rapid wear, stiffness (especially run-flat variants), noise, and cracking issues. Owners frequently compare them unfavorably to alternatives like Michelin or Pirelli, though budget-friendly deals tend to draw occasional interest.
“Mount all 4 tires Bridgestone Potenza S001 215/45R20 on i3s stock rims 5.5” front 15mm spacers and 6.5” rear After much convincing I have mounted all four tires of the same size purchased on TireRack for $83 each on i3s stock staggered rims. Smooth and stable. Looking gooddddddd!”
“Replacing Bridgestone Potenza s001 RunFlats with Primacy 5 vs. PS5. Suggestions? I drive a VW Jetta which only has 160 Hp. I do occasionally really enjoy some spirited driving or taking aggressive turns. My considerations are that I do really care about Comfort and road noise and so that leads me towards the Primacy 5. At the same time, I don't think the power of my car justifies the PS5. My question is basically, I've online that for runflats to be runflats they have really stiff sidewalls, which might be contributing to the current feel of my car and I wonder if, even though everything else about the Potenza s001 is quite worse compared to the Primacy 5, I wonder if I will miss the stiff sidewall? And just because of that should I consider the PS5?”
“Brand New Bridgestone Potenza S001 Tyres worn after 10k mileage? So I got 4 brand new tyres last June from Costco, 255/35 R19. I only drive locally, occasional trips to another city. 10k mileage later, my front two tyres flagged up on my recent MOT as : Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge CHANGE ASAP (5.2.3 (e)) Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge EDGED (5.2.3 (e)) Seems surprising to me as I don't drive crazy, occasional spirited driving. 2011 Audi s5. is this normal? Thinking of getting another brand this time for the front two tyres. Car is a quattro but same types on same axis should suffice? Any recommendations on tyres? Read more”
“I put the Potenza S001 tires on the rear of my i3s with that Tire Rack deal but I didn't think they would fit on the 5.5 inch rims. I think the rears are 6.0".”
Based on 16 community posts
Bridgestone Turanza T001
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Potenza S001 | B · Bridgestone Turanza T001 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Max Performance tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 15 | 2 |
| Rim diameters | 17″ – 21″ | 17″ |
| Tread depth | 8/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 280 A A | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 50 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone
Bridgestone
Winner: Bridgestone Turanza T001 — better comfort and wet. Pick the Bridgestone Potenza S001 if handling, dry and treadwear matter most to you.
Bridgestone Turanza T001 scores 72 vs 45 on comfort.
Bridgestone Potenza S001 scores 74 vs 67 on handling.
Bridgestone Turanza T001 scores 88 vs 82 on wet.
Bridgestone Potenza S001 scores 83 vs 79 on dry.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.