Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport LT vs Falken ZIEX CT50 — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

VS
Tire B Falken

Falken ZIEX CT50

Summer Premium Touring tires

Falken ZIEX CT50 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
52/100
3 owner reviews
Dry
79
Wet
62
Snow
37
Comfort
58
Treadwear
63
Handling
70

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictOnly Falken ZIEX CT50 has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

6 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport LT
–
B — Falken ZIEX CT50
79
Why this score
SourceAdvantage T/A Sport LTZIEX CT50
Tyre Reviews owners – 77

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100)
A — BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport LT
–
B — Falken ZIEX CT50
62
Why this score
SourceAdvantage T/A Sport LTZIEX CT50
Tyre Reviews owners – 60

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport LT
–
B — Falken ZIEX CT50
37

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport LT
–
B — Falken ZIEX CT50
58
Why this score
SourceAdvantage T/A Sport LTZIEX CT50
Tyre Reviews owners – 53

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100)
A — BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport LT
–
B — Falken ZIEX CT50
63
Why this score
SourceAdvantage T/A Sport LTZIEX CT50
Tyre Reviews owners – 65

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport LT
–
B — Falken ZIEX CT50
70
Why this score
SourceAdvantage T/A Sport LTZIEX CT50
Tyre Reviews owners – 70

Scores at a glance

BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport LT vs Falken ZIEX CT50: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport LTFalken ZIEX CT50
Relative Score – 62
Dry – 79
Wet – 62
Snow – 37
Comfort – 58
Treadwear – 63
Handling – 70

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport LT

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Falken ZIEX CT50

The Falken ZIEX CT50 receives mixed to negative feedback, primarily criticized for its excessive road noise and acoustic performance. While users acknowledge acceptable handling characteristics and reasonable tread longevity, the persistent noise issues significantly detract from the overall ownership experience.

Pros

  • Acceptable tread wear longevity
  • Competent handling performance
  • Reliable dry road stability

Cons

  • Excessive road noise and 'wooing' sounds on tarmac
  • Low treadwear rating (300) compared to aftermarket alternatives
  • Susceptibility to manufacturing defects such as slow leaks

Observations

  • Mazda CX-9 owners consistently report that the tire compromises the vehicle's intended quiet cabin experience.
  • Users note that the tire's performance and noise levels do not improve with consistent rotation or pressure adjustments.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport LT B · Falken ZIEX CT50
Category—Summer Premium Touring tires
Vehicle type—Passenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth10 - 11/32″—
UTQG660 - 740 B A—
SidewallBlack Side Wall—
Max pressure44 - 50 psi—
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

BFGoodrich

Falken

Only Falken ZIEX CT50 has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.

Tire A · BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport LT
Tire B · Falken ZIEX CT50

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.