Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport LT vs Falken ZIEX CT50 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | Advantage T/A Sport LT | ZIEX CT50 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 77 |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | Advantage T/A Sport LT | ZIEX CT50 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 60 |
Snow
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | Advantage T/A Sport LT | ZIEX CT50 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 53 |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | Advantage T/A Sport LT | ZIEX CT50 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 65 |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | Advantage T/A Sport LT | ZIEX CT50 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 70 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport LT | Falken ZIEX CT50 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | – | 62 |
| Dry | – | 79 |
| Wet | – | 62 |
| Snow | – | 37 |
| Comfort | – | 58 |
| Treadwear | – | 63 |
| Handling | – | 70 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
The Falken ZIEX CT50 receives mixed to negative feedback, primarily criticized for its excessive road noise and acoustic performance. While users acknowledge acceptable handling characteristics and reasonable tread longevity, the persistent noise issues significantly detract from the overall ownership experience.
Pros
- Acceptable tread wear longevity
- Competent handling performance
- Reliable dry road stability
Cons
- Excessive road noise and 'wooing' sounds on tarmac
- Low treadwear rating (300) compared to aftermarket alternatives
- Susceptibility to manufacturing defects such as slow leaks
Observations
- Mazda CX-9 owners consistently report that the tire compromises the vehicle's intended quiet cabin experience.
- Users note that the tire's performance and noise levels do not improve with consistent rotation or pressure adjustments.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport LT | B · Falken ZIEX CT50 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | — | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | — | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | 10 - 11/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 660 - 740 B A | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 - 50 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
BFGoodrich
Falken
Only Falken ZIEX CT50 has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.