Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Falken ZIEX CT50 — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

VS
Tire B Falken

Falken ZIEX CT50

Summer Premium Touring tires

Falken ZIEX CT50 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
52/100
3 owner reviews
Dry
79
Wet
62
Snow
37
Comfort
58
Noise
–
Treadwear
63
Handling
70

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Continental CrossContact LX25 — better snow, comfort and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) CrossContact LX25 leads by 3
A — Continental CrossContact LX25
82
B — Falken ZIEX CT50
79
Why this score
SourceCrossContact LX25ZIEX CT50
Professional tests (TWG score) 71 –
Tire Rack owners 93 –
Tyre Reviews owners 93 77
SimpleTire owners 99 –

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) CrossContact LX25 leads by 30
A — Continental CrossContact LX25
92
B — Falken ZIEX CT50
62
Why this score
SourceCrossContact LX25ZIEX CT50
Tire Rack owners 92 –
Tyre Reviews owners 93 60
SimpleTire owners 93 –

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) CrossContact LX25 leads by 57
A — Continental CrossContact LX25
94
B — Falken ZIEX CT50
37
Why this score
SourceCrossContact LX25ZIEX CT50
Professional tests (TWG score) 100 –
Tire Rack owners 83 –
Tyre Reviews owners 90 –
SimpleTire owners 86 –

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) CrossContact LX25 leads by 36
A — Continental CrossContact LX25
94
B — Falken ZIEX CT50
58
Why this score
SourceCrossContact LX25ZIEX CT50
Tire Rack owners 90 –
Tyre Reviews owners 97 53
SimpleTire owners 95 –

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Continental CrossContact LX25
93
B — Falken ZIEX CT50
–
Why this score
SourceCrossContact LX25ZIEX CT50
SimpleTire owners 94 –

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) CrossContact LX25 leads by 26
A — Continental CrossContact LX25
89
B — Falken ZIEX CT50
63
Why this score
SourceCrossContact LX25ZIEX CT50
Tire Rack owners 91 –
Tyre Reviews owners 93 65
SimpleTire owners 89 –

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) CrossContact LX25 leads by 15
A — Continental CrossContact LX25
85
B — Falken ZIEX CT50
70
Why this score
SourceCrossContact LX25ZIEX CT50
Tyre Reviews owners 85 70

Scores at a glance

Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Falken ZIEX CT50: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental CrossContact LX25Falken ZIEX CT50
Relative Score 90 62
Dry 82 79
Wet 92 62
Snow 94 37
Comfort 94 58
Noise 93 –
Treadwear 89 63
Handling 85 70

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Continental CrossContact LX25

The Continental CrossContact LX25 is highly regarded by users for its exceptional ride comfort, low noise levels, and reliable all-season traction. It is frequently cited as a superior replacement for factory-installed tires, offering a balanced performance profile that excels in daily driving conditions across various climates.

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and quiet operation
  • Significantly improved braking performance
  • Predictable and confident handling in light snow and wet conditions
  • Strong value proposition compared to premium factory-installed alternatives

Cons

  • Tendency to pick up and eject road gravel
  • Occasional reports of premature tread wear in specific use cases
  • Stiffer sidewall response when encountering sharp road imperfections or deep potholes

Observations

  • Luxury SUV owners (Mercedes ML/GLE) report a significant improvement in ride quality and cabin noise when replacing factory run-flat tires with the LX25.
  • Users with 19-inch wheel configurations on compact crossovers like the Mazda CX-5 find the tire to be a reliable solution for challenging New England weather conditions.
Tire B Falken ZIEX CT50

The Falken ZIEX CT50 receives mixed to negative feedback, primarily criticized for its excessive road noise and acoustic performance. While users acknowledge acceptable handling characteristics and reasonable tread longevity, the persistent noise issues significantly detract from the overall ownership experience.

Pros

  • Acceptable tread wear longevity
  • Competent handling performance
  • Reliable dry road stability

Cons

  • Excessive road noise and 'wooing' sounds on tarmac
  • Low treadwear rating (300) compared to aftermarket alternatives
  • Susceptibility to manufacturing defects such as slow leaks

Observations

  • Mazda CX-9 owners consistently report that the tire compromises the vehicle's intended quiet cabin experience.
  • Users note that the tire's performance and noise levels do not improve with consistent rotation or pressure adjustments.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental CrossContact LX25 B · Falken ZIEX CT50
Category—Summer Premium Touring tires
Vehicle type—Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available40—
Rim diameters16″ – 22″—
Tread depth10 - 12/32″—
UTQG740 A A - B—
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering—
Max pressure44 - 51 psi—
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental

Falken

Winner: Continental CrossContact LX25 — better snow, comfort and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 94 vs 37 on snow.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 94 vs 58 on comfort.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 92 vs 62 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 89 vs 63 on treadwear.

Tire A · Continental CrossContact LX25
Tire B · Falken ZIEX CT50

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.