79
/ 100
Objective (60%)
73/100
2 professional tests
User signal (40%)
73/100
38 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 vs Kumho Road Venture ST KL16 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
92
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
92/100
68 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Kumho Road Venture ST KL16 — better wet, comfort and handling. Pick the BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 if noise matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Road Venture ST KL16 leads by 14
Why this score
| Source | All Terrain TA KO2 | Road Venture ST KL16 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 81 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 88 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 82 | 80 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Road Venture ST KL16 leads by 23
Why this score
| Source | All Terrain TA KO2 | Road Venture ST KL16 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 68 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 90 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 66 | 40 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Road Venture ST KL16 leads by 11
Why this score
| Source | All Terrain TA KO2 | Road Venture ST KL16 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 80 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 92 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 81 | – |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Road Venture ST KL16 leads by 21
Why this score
| Source | All Terrain TA KO2 | Road Venture ST KL16 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 87 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 72 | 80 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
All Terrain TA KO2 leads by 8
Why this score
| Source | All Terrain TA KO2 | Road Venture ST KL16 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 100 | – |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Road Venture ST KL16 leads by 8
Why this score
| Source | All Terrain TA KO2 | Road Venture ST KL16 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 85 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 84 | 100 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Road Venture ST KL16 leads by 19
Why this score
| Source | All Terrain TA KO2 | Road Venture ST KL16 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 72 | 60 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 | Kumho Road Venture ST KL16 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 79 | 92 |
| Dry | 82 | 96 |
| Wet | 67 | 90 |
| Snow | 81 | 92 |
| Comfort | 72 | 93 |
| Noise | 100 | 92 |
| Treadwear | 84 | 92 |
| Handling | 72 | 91 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
79
/ 100
Tire A
92
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 is widely regarded as a benchmark for off-road durability and rugged versatility, excelling in gravel, sand, and rocky terrain. While users praise its longevity and aggressive aesthetic, there is a consistent consensus regarding its declining performance in wet conditions and increased road noise as the rubber compound hardens over time.
Pros
- Exceptional off-road durability and puncture resistance
- Strong traction in gravel, sand, and rocky terrain
- Long tread life and high mileage capability
- Aggressive, iconic visual appeal
Cons
- Significant loss of wet-weather grip and braking performance
- Increased road noise and harsh ride quality as the tire ages
- Rubber compound tends to harden, negatively impacting cold-weather and wet-surface traction
- Poor performance on ice and hard-packed snow
Observations
- Users with lighter vehicles or vans (e.g., Sprinter) report varying experiences with noise and comfort, often noting that the tire's weight impacts ride quality.
- Owners of heavy-duty 4x4s and trucks frequently highlight the tire's ability to handle high-speed gravel and heavy loads without structural failure.
The Kumho Road Venture ST KL16 is generally regarded as a high-value, budget-friendly tire that excels in road noise reduction and dry pavement comfort. While many users praise its longevity and quiet operation, performance in wet or challenging off-road conditions is inconsistent, with some users reporting a lack of confidence in slippery environments.
Pros
- Exceptional value for the price point
- Surprisingly low road noise for an all-terrain/aggressive tread design
- Good tread life and durability
- Comfortable ride quality on highway and city surfaces
Cons
- Inconsistent traction on wet surfaces
- Tendency to cup or vibrate if not maintained properly
- Less aggressive aesthetic compared to premium competitors like BFGoodrich
- Occasional reports of balancing issues or ride harshness on heavy-duty trucks
Observations
- Users on lighter SUVs and older Jeeps report significant improvements in cabin noise and ride comfort compared to more aggressive mud-terrain alternatives.
- Heavy-duty truck owners (e.g., Dodge RAM 2500) report mixed experiences, with some noting ride quality issues and vibrations that were not present with other brands.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 | B · Kumho Road Venture ST KL16 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season All Terrain and Off Road tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | — | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 16 | — |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 20″ | — |
| Tread depth | 13 - 15/32″ | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 50,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Raised White Lettering | — |
| Max pressure | 35 - 80 psi | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
79
/ 100
BFGoodrich
92
/ 100
Kumho
Winner: Kumho Road Venture ST KL16 — better wet, comfort and handling. Pick the BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 if noise matters most to you.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Kumho Road Venture ST KL16 scores 90 vs 67 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Kumho Road Venture ST KL16 scores 93 vs 72 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Kumho Road Venture ST KL16 scores 91 vs 72 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Kumho Road Venture ST KL16 scores 96 vs 82 on dry.
Tire A · BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2
Tire B · Kumho Road Venture ST KL16
More comparisons
Also compared with
BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 also compared with
Kumho Road Venture ST KL16 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.