83
/ 100
Objective (60%)
72/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
84/100
710 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S vs Yokohama Advan Sport AS — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
Tire B
Yokohama
Yokohama Advan Sport AS
71
/ 100
Objective (60%)
67/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
74/100
12 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S — better wet, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
g-Force COMP-2 A/S leads by 13
Why this score
| Source | g-Force COMP-2 A/S | Advan Sport AS |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 88 | 70 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 100 | 80 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) | 96% | 90% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) | 99% | 96% |
Wet
Score (0–100)
g-Force COMP-2 A/S leads by 17
Why this score
| Source | g-Force COMP-2 A/S | Advan Sport AS |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 81 | 58 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 73 |
| Wet Braking (% of best) | 89% | 85% |
Snow
Score (0–100)
g-Force COMP-2 A/S leads by 9
Why this score
| Source | g-Force COMP-2 A/S | Advan Sport AS |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 60 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
g-Force COMP-2 A/S leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | g-Force COMP-2 A/S | Advan Sport AS |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 89 | 78 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 90 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | g-Force COMP-2 A/S | Advan Sport AS |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 76 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
g-Force COMP-2 A/S leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | g-Force COMP-2 A/S | Advan Sport AS |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 50 | 80 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
g-Force COMP-2 A/S leads by 17
Why this score
| Source | g-Force COMP-2 A/S | Advan Sport AS |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 73 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S | Yokohama Advan Sport AS |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 83 | 71 |
| Dry | 90 | 77 |
| Wet | 84 | 67 |
| Snow | 69 | 60 |
| Comfort | 87 | 80 |
| Noise | – | 76 |
| Treadwear | 81 | 71 |
| Handling | 90 | 73 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
83
/ 100
Tire A
71
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Test data
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Tire A | Tire B | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 96% #5/7 · 2023 Tyre Reviews UHP All Season Tyre Test | 90% #5/5 · 2025 AutoView Ultra High Performance All-Season Tyre Test | +5.2 | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 99% #4/7 · 2023 Tyre Reviews UHP All Season Tyre Test | 96% #5/5 · 2025 AutoView Ultra High Performance All-Season Tyre Test | +3.2 | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 14% #7/7 · 2023 Tyre Reviews UHP All Season Tyre Test | 20% #5/5 · 2025 AutoView Ultra High Performance All-Season Tyre Test | -5.7 | Different tests |
| Subj. Comfort | Subj | 95% #6/7 · 2023 Tyre Reviews UHP All Season Tyre Test | 90% #5/5 · 2025 AutoView Ultra High Performance All-Season Tyre Test | +5 | Different tests |
| Subj. Noise | Subj | 98% #4/7 · 2023 Tyre Reviews UHP All Season Tyre Test | 97% #3/5 · 2025 AutoView Ultra High Performance All-Season Tyre Test | +0.9 | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 89% #7/7 · 2023 Tyre Reviews UHP All Season Tyre Test | 85% #5/5 · 2025 AutoView Ultra High Performance All-Season Tyre Test | +4 | Different tests |
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The BFGoodrich G-Force COMP-2 A/S is widely regarded as a high-performance, value-oriented tire that excels in wet and dry traction, often outperforming more expensive OEM options. While users frequently praise its aggressive handling and confidence-inspiring grip, a significant portion of the feedback highlights concerns regarding road noise and shorter-than-expected tread life.
Pros
- Exceptional wet and dry traction that inspires driver confidence.
- High value-to-performance ratio compared to premium competitors.
- Responsive steering and stable cornering capabilities.
- Aggressive, sporty aesthetic that many owners appreciate.
Cons
- Noticeable road noise, often described as a 'hum' or 'growl' that increases with wear.
- Tread life often falls short of expectations, with many users reporting premature wear.
- Tendency to develop vibrations or balance issues over time.
- Limited performance in deep snow or icy conditions despite being marketed as all-season.
Observations
- Owners of heavier vehicles or those with high-horsepower RWD platforms (e.g., Dodge Charger, Mustang) report excellent grip but note faster rear tire wear.
- Users transitioning from run-flat tires to these standard tires consistently report a significant improvement in ride comfort and noise reduction.
- Drivers of smaller, lighter cars (e.g., Miata, Civic) appreciate the handling improvements but sometimes find the tire's sidewall stiffness to be a trade-off for ride harshness.
The Yokohama Advan Sport AS is generally regarded as a competent, budget-friendly performance tire that excels in comfort and dry-road handling. While many users appreciate the value proposition and smooth ride quality, there is a notable divide regarding tread longevity and wet-weather performance, with some users reporting premature wear and stability concerns.
Pros
- Excellent value for the price, especially when sourced as discounted inventory
- Smooth and quiet ride quality
- Strong dry-road grip and cornering performance
- Improved acceleration times compared to previous sets
Cons
- Significant concerns regarding rapid tread wear and short lifespan
- Inconsistent performance in wet or cool conditions
- Lack of high-end performance feedback for spirited driving
- Potential for stability issues at highway speeds
Observations
- Users transitioning from run-flat tires to this standard construction report improved ride comfort.
- One user noted superior tread longevity on an electric vehicle compared to their previous Pirelli tires.
- Performance-oriented drivers found the tire insufficient for track-day longevity, noting rapid degradation after limited use.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S | B · Yokohama Advan Sport AS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Ultra High Performance All Season tire | — |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | — |
| Tread depth | 9 - 10/32″ | 11/32″ |
| UTQG | 400 AA A | 440 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | 45,000 mi | 50,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 50 - 51 psi | 50 psi |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
83
/ 100
BFGoodrich
71
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S — better wet, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S scores 84 vs 67 on wet.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S scores 90 vs 73 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S scores 90 vs 77 on dry.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S scores 81 vs 71 on treadwear.
Tire A · BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S
Tire B · Yokohama Advan Sport AS
More comparisons
Also compared with
BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S also compared with
Yokohama Advan Sport AS also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.