80
/ 100
Objective (60%)
69/100
3 professional tests
User signal (40%)
84/100
47 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
BFGoodrich g-Grip vs Firestone TZ300 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
71
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
72/100
19 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: BFGoodrich g-Grip — better treadwear, handling and comfort. Pick the Firestone TZ300 if dry matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
TZ300 leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | g-Grip | TZ300 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 66 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 89 | 81 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
g-Grip leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | g-Grip | TZ300 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 72 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 79 | 71 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
g-Grip leads by 9
Why this score
| Source | g-Grip | TZ300 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 76 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | g-Grip | TZ300 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 57 | – |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
g-Grip leads by 18
Why this score
| Source | g-Grip | TZ300 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 86 | 68 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
g-Grip leads by 17
Why this score
| Source | g-Grip | TZ300 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 63 |
| DriverReviews owners | 84 | – |
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich g-Grip | Firestone TZ300 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 80 | 71 |
| Dry | 75 | 81 |
| Wet | 75 | 71 |
| Comfort | 85 | 76 |
| Noise | 57 | – |
| Treadwear | 86 | 68 |
| Handling | 80 | 63 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
80
/ 100
Tire A
71
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The BFGoodrich gGrip is widely regarded as a high-value, durable tire that offers impressive longevity and consistent performance for daily driving. While some users note a lack of sharp steering feedback and occasional noise as the tread wears, the consensus highlights it as a reliable, cost-effective alternative to premium brands.
Pros
- Excellent value for money compared to premium competitors
- High tread life and durability
- Strong, predictable grip in both dry and wet conditions
- Smooth and comfortable ride quality
Cons
- Lack of steering feel and handling feedback
- Increased noise levels as the tire wears
- Soft sidewalls which may feel less precise during spirited driving
- Occasional reports of inconsistent wet-weather traction
Observations
- Users with high-torque diesel vehicles report excellent tread longevity compared to more expensive performance brands.
- Drivers of smaller, lighter hatchbacks appreciate the tire's balance of comfort and durability, though some noted a lack of 'sporty' feedback.
- Owners of larger sedans and estates (e.g., Audi A6, Ford Mondeo) report that the tires handle heavy loads and towing duties effectively.
The Firestone TZ300 is widely regarded as a competent mid-range tire that offers a strong balance of value and performance for daily driving. While many users praise its wet and dry grip, quiet ride, and longevity, there is a notable divide in user experience regarding tread wear and high-speed stability.
Pros
- Excellent value for money compared to premium brands
- Generally quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Strong traction in both wet and dry conditions for standard road use
- Noticeable performance improvement over budget-tier tires
Cons
- Inconsistent tread wear life reported across different vehicles
- Reports of increased road noise on certain road surfaces
- Unpredictable handling or light steering feel at higher speeds
- Occasional reports of poor wet-weather braking performance
Observations
- Drivers of heavier vehicles or those with high-torque engines reported faster-than-expected front tire wear.
- Users noted that the tire provides a significant upgrade in stability and grip when transitioning from budget-brand tires, particularly for towing or daily commuting.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich g-Grip | B · Firestone TZ300 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | High Performance Summer tire | Summer High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
80
/ 100
BFGoodrich
71
/ 100
Firestone
Winner: BFGoodrich g-Grip — better treadwear, handling and comfort. Pick the Firestone TZ300 if dry matters most to you.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
BFGoodrich g-Grip scores 86 vs 68 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
BFGoodrich g-Grip scores 80 vs 63 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
BFGoodrich g-Grip scores 85 vs 76 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Firestone TZ300 scores 81 vs 75 on dry.
Tire A · BFGoodrich g-Grip
Tire B · Firestone TZ300
More comparisons
Also compared with
BFGoodrich g-Grip also compared with
Firestone TZ300 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.