63
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
61/100
48 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Bridgestone B250 vs Yokohama AS430 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
71
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
71/100
4 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Yokohama AS430 — better wet, dry and comfort. Pick the Bridgestone B250 if handling and treadwear matter most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
AS430 leads by 19
Why this score
| Source | B250 | AS430 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 66 | 85 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
AS430 leads by 20
Why this score
| Source | B250 | AS430 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 55 | 75 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
AS430 leads by 19
Why this score
| Source | B250 | AS430 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 64 | 83 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
B250 leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | B250 | AS430 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 63 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
B250 leads by 12
Why this score
| Source | B250 | AS430 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 62 | 50 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone B250 | Yokohama AS430 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 63 | 71 |
| Dry | 66 | 85 |
| Wet | 55 | 75 |
| Comfort | 64 | 83 |
| Treadwear | 70 | 63 |
| Handling | 62 | 50 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
63
/ 100
Tire A
71
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone B250 is widely regarded as a durable, long-lasting economy tire, frequently serving as an OEM fitment for compact and family vehicles. While many users praise its longevity and reliable dry-weather performance, it is consistently criticized for poor wet-weather traction and high levels of road noise.
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and durability
- Reliable handling and grip on dry tarmac
- Cost-effective for daily commuting
- Consistent performance across various temperatures
Cons
- Significant lack of grip in wet conditions
- High levels of road noise
- Inconsistent tread wear rates depending on vehicle weight
- Lack of steering feedback or 'communicative' feel
Observations
- Users of heavier vehicles, such as the Kia Sedona and Carnival, reported significantly lower mileage and faster tread wear compared to lighter compact cars.
- Owners of vehicles with known cabin noise issues, such as the Mazda 3, frequently cited the B250 as exacerbating road noise levels.
- Drivers of smaller, lighter cars (e.g., Nissan Micra, Daihatsu Xenia) reported mixed experiences, with some noting a negative impact on fuel efficiency and handling.
The Yokohama AS430 receives a polarized reception from users, with experiences ranging from high satisfaction regarding noise levels and wet-weather traction to significant disappointment regarding tread longevity. While some drivers praise its balanced performance in varied conditions, others report premature wear that falls short of expectations for the tire's class.
Pros
- Excellent wet and dry surface grip
- Surprisingly quiet ride quality
- Reliable performance in rainy climates
Cons
- Rapid tread wear and short lifespan
- Inconsistent durability across different driving styles
- Lack of longevity compared to premium competitors
Observations
- Users driving compact sedans like the Mazda3 reported dissatisfaction with the tire's longevity, noting a loss of grip after approximately 25,000 miles.
- Performance-oriented drivers noted the tire's capability in diverse conditions, though long-term wear remains a point of contention.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone B250 | B · Yokohama AS430 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Touring tires | All Season High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
63
/ 100
Bridgestone
71
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Yokohama AS430 — better wet, dry and comfort. Pick the Bridgestone B250 if handling and treadwear matter most to you.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Yokohama AS430 scores 75 vs 55 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Yokohama AS430 scores 85 vs 66 on dry.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Yokohama AS430 scores 83 vs 64 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Bridgestone B250 scores 62 vs 50 on handling.
Tire A · Bridgestone B250
Tire B · Yokohama AS430
More comparisons
Also compared with
Bridgestone B250 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.