86
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
90/100
33 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 vs Continental ContiCrossContact Winter — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
75
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
76/100
4 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 — better comfort, treadwear and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Blizzak DM-V2 leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak DM-V2 | ContiCrossContact Winter |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 90 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 82 | 83 |
| SimpleTire owners | 91 | – |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Blizzak DM-V2 leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak DM-V2 | ContiCrossContact Winter |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 92 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 76 | 80 |
| SimpleTire owners | 93 | – |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak DM-V2 | ContiCrossContact Winter |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 94 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 98 | – |
| SimpleTire owners | 99 | – |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Blizzak DM-V2 leads by 17
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak DM-V2 | ContiCrossContact Winter |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 88 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 76 | 73 |
| SimpleTire owners | 92 | – |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak DM-V2 | ContiCrossContact Winter |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleTire owners | 88 | – |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Blizzak DM-V2 leads by 17
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak DM-V2 | ContiCrossContact Winter |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 84 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 58 | 65 |
| SimpleTire owners | 86 | – |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Blizzak DM-V2 leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak DM-V2 | ContiCrossContact Winter |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 78 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 | Continental ContiCrossContact Winter |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 86 | 75 |
| Dry | 90 | 83 |
| Wet | 90 | 80 |
| Snow | 99 | – |
| Comfort | 90 | 73 |
| Noise | 88 | – |
| Treadwear | 82 | 65 |
| Handling | 80 | 78 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
86
/ 100
Tire A
75
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 is widely regarded as a premier dedicated winter tire, consistently praised for its exceptional traction and braking performance on snow and ice. While users acknowledge that the soft rubber compound leads to faster tread wear if used in warmer temperatures, the consensus is that the safety and handling benefits in harsh winter conditions far outweigh these longevity concerns.
Pros
- Exceptional grip and braking performance on snow and ice
- High level of driver confidence in severe winter weather
- Surprisingly quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Significant improvement over all-season tires for winter handling
Cons
- Faster tread wear compared to all-season tires
- Performance degrades if left on the vehicle during warmer spring/summer months
- Potential for reduced wet-weather grip as the tire wears down
Observations
- Users report excellent performance across a variety of vehicle types, including heavy SUVs like the BMW X5 and VW Touareg, as well as light trucks like the Ford F-150.
- Owners of hybrid vehicles noted that the tire's soft compound may wear more quickly under the specific torque characteristics of their vehicles.
- Some users successfully utilize oversized tire diameters for increased ground clearance in deep snow without sacrificing ride quality.
The Continental ContiCrossContact Winter receives polarized feedback, with users split between high praise for its snow and dry-road performance and significant criticism regarding its longevity and wet-weather handling. While some drivers find it to be a quiet and capable all-weather performer, others report concerns regarding fuel efficiency and traction in mud or heavy rain.
Pros
- Exceptional traction and braking performance in snow conditions
- Surprisingly quiet and stable on dry pavement
- Strong grip during spirited driving on winding roads
- Versatile performance that some users find suitable for year-round use
Cons
- Poor resistance to aquaplaning in wet conditions
- Short tread life compared to premium competitors
- Negative impact on fuel consumption
- Inadequate performance in deep mud
Observations
- Users noted a significant disparity in tread longevity, with some reporting premature wear at 30,000 km compared to expectations of 60,000+ km.
- The tire is perceived as a viable alternative to summer-biased tires for drivers in regions with mild winters, provided they prioritize dry-road comfort.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 | B · Continental ContiCrossContact Winter |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Premium Touring Winter tire | All Season Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 48 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 22″ | — |
| Tread depth | 13/32″ | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
86
/ 100
Bridgestone
75
/ 100
Continental
Winner: Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 — better comfort, treadwear and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 scores 90 vs 73 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 scores 82 vs 65 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 scores 90 vs 80 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 scores 90 vs 83 on dry.
Tire A · Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2
Tire B · Continental ContiCrossContact Winter
More comparisons
Also compared with
Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 also compared with
Continental ContiCrossContact Winter also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.