80
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
87/100
Owner ratings
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-60 RFT vs Bridgestone Blizzak WS80 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
80
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
82/100
5 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictToo close to call: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-60 RFT and Bridgestone Blizzak WS80 are within 2 points overall. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-60 RFT is stronger on handling, wet and dry. Bridgestone Blizzak WS80 is stronger on treadwear, snow and comfort.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Blizzak LM-60 RFT leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM-60 RFT | Blizzak WS80 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 81 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 74 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Blizzak LM-60 RFT leads by 8
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM-60 RFT | Blizzak WS80 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 83 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 76 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Blizzak WS80 leads by 9
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM-60 RFT | Blizzak WS80 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 85 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 96 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Blizzak WS80 leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM-60 RFT | Blizzak WS80 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 78 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 83 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Blizzak WS80 leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM-60 RFT | Blizzak WS80 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 76 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 82 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Blizzak LM-60 RFT leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM-60 RFT | Blizzak WS80 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 70 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Blizzak LM-60 RFT | Bridgestone Blizzak WS80 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 80 | 80 |
| Dry | 80 | 74 |
| Wet | 84 | 76 |
| Snow | 87 | 96 |
| Comfort | 78 | 83 |
| Noise | 74 | – |
| Treadwear | 72 | 82 |
| Handling | 80 | 70 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
80
/ 100
Tire A
80
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
The Bridgestone Blizzak WS80 is widely regarded as a top-tier winter tire, praised for its exceptional traction in deep snow and on icy inclines. While some users note a 'squishy' feel on wet pavement, the consensus highlights its reliability and longevity in harsh, rural winter conditions.
Pros
- Exceptional grip and climbing ability on deep snow and ice
- Impressive tread longevity when properly rotated
- High confidence and stability in severe winter weather conditions
- Quiet road noise levels
Cons
- Noticeable 'squishy' or soft handling characteristics on wet roads
- Potential for reduced performance in slush compared to newer compounds
- Handling feedback can feel vague to the average driver
Observations
- Subaru Forester owners report excellent capability in deep snow, even when conditions exceed subframe depth.
- Small vehicle owners, such as those driving Scion XDs, noted significant performance advantages on steep, snow-covered hills compared to other vehicles.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM-60 RFT | B · Bridgestone Blizzak WS80 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | — | Winter Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | — | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | 11/32″ | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
80
/ 100
Bridgestone
80
/ 100
Bridgestone
Too close to call: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-60 RFT and Bridgestone Blizzak WS80 are within 2 points overall. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-60 RFT is stronger on handling, wet and dry. Bridgestone Blizzak WS80 is stronger on treadwear, snow and comfort.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-60 RFT scores 80 vs 70 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Bridgestone Blizzak WS80 scores 82 vs 72 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You drive through snowy winters
Bridgestone Blizzak WS80 scores 96 vs 87 on snow.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-60 RFT scores 84 vs 76 on wet.
Tire A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM-60 RFT
Tire B · Bridgestone Blizzak WS80
More comparisons
Also compared with
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-60 RFT also compared with
Bridgestone Blizzak WS80 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.