86
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
87/100
7 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT vs Bridgestone Blizzak LM-60 RFT — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
80
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
87/100
Owner ratings
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT — better treadwear, snow and comfort. Pick the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-60 RFT if handling matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Blizzak LM-25 RFT leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM-25 RFT | Blizzak LM-60 RFT |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 87 | 81 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 84 | – |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Blizzak LM-25 RFT leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM-25 RFT | Blizzak LM-60 RFT |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 88 | 83 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 89 | – |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Blizzak LM-25 RFT leads by 12
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM-25 RFT | Blizzak LM-60 RFT |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 80 | 85 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 100 | – |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Blizzak LM-25 RFT leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM-25 RFT | Blizzak LM-60 RFT |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 71 | 78 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 84 | – |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Blizzak LM-25 RFT leads by 14
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM-25 RFT | Blizzak LM-60 RFT |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 75 | 76 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 87 | – |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Blizzak LM-60 RFT leads by 9
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM-25 RFT | Blizzak LM-60 RFT |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 71 | – |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT | Bridgestone Blizzak LM-60 RFT |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 86 | 80 |
| Dry | 85 | 80 |
| Wet | 89 | 84 |
| Snow | 99 | 87 |
| Comfort | 84 | 78 |
| Noise | – | 74 |
| Treadwear | 86 | 72 |
| Handling | 71 | 80 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
86
/ 100
Tire A
80
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 RFT is highly regarded for its exceptional winter performance, particularly in transforming the drivability of rear-wheel-drive vehicles in snow and ice. While users praise its confidence-inspiring grip and comfort, they note that its performance diminishes significantly in warmer, dry conditions, where braking distances increase and handling becomes less precise.
Pros
- Outstanding traction and control on snow and ice
- Significant improvement in winter mobility for rear-wheel-drive vehicles
- Comfortable and quiet ride quality compared to standard summer run-flats
- Effective slush dispersal
Cons
- Reduced braking performance and handling in temperatures above 20°C
- Longer braking distances on dry pavement compared to summer tires
- Performance limitations when used outside of cold-weather conditions
Observations
- Owners of rear-wheel-drive BMW models (3 Series, Z4) report a transformative improvement in winter capability.
- Downsizing to 16-inch wheels from larger summer setups is noted as a successful strategy for maximizing winter grip.
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT | B · Bridgestone Blizzak LM-60 RFT |
|---|---|---|
| Tread depth | — | 11/32″ |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 44 psi |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
86
/ 100
Bridgestone
80
/ 100
Bridgestone
Winner: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT — better treadwear, snow and comfort. Pick the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-60 RFT if handling matters most to you.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT scores 86 vs 72 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You drive through snowy winters
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT scores 99 vs 87 on snow.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-60 RFT scores 80 vs 71 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT scores 84 vs 78 on comfort.
Tire A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT
Tire B · Bridgestone Blizzak LM-60 RFT
More comparisons
Also compared with
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT also compared with
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-60 RFT also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.