Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT vs Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM-25 RFT | Blizzak WS90 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 58 |
| Tire Rack owners | 87 | 88 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 84 | 70 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 88 |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM-25 RFT | Blizzak WS90 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 55 |
| Tire Rack owners | 88 | 91 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 89 | 80 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 86 |
Snow
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM-25 RFT | Blizzak WS90 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 65 |
| Tire Rack owners | 80 | 93 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 100 | 100 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 91 |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM-25 RFT | Blizzak WS90 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 86 |
| Tire Rack owners | 71 | 85 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 84 | 64 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 87 |
Noise
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM-25 RFT | Blizzak WS90 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleTire owners | – | 77 |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM-25 RFT | Blizzak WS90 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 75 | 84 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 87 | 73 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 82 |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM-25 RFT | Blizzak WS90 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 71 | 65 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT | Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 86 | 73 |
| Dry | 85 | 68 |
| Wet | 89 | 67 |
| Snow | 99 | 76 |
| Comfort | 84 | 84 |
| Noise | – | 77 |
| Treadwear | 86 | 79 |
| Handling | 71 | 65 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 RFT is highly regarded for its exceptional winter performance, particularly in transforming the drivability of rear-wheel-drive vehicles in snow and ice. While users praise its confidence-inspiring grip and comfort, they note that its performance diminishes significantly in warmer, dry conditions, where braking distances increase and handling becomes less precise.
Pros
- Outstanding traction and control on snow and ice
- Significant improvement in winter mobility for rear-wheel-drive vehicles
- Comfortable and quiet ride quality compared to standard summer run-flats
- Effective slush dispersal
Cons
- Reduced braking performance and handling in temperatures above 20°C
- Longer braking distances on dry pavement compared to summer tires
- Performance limitations when used outside of cold-weather conditions
Observations
- Owners of rear-wheel-drive BMW models (3 Series, Z4) report a transformative improvement in winter capability.
- Downsizing to 16-inch wheels from larger summer setups is noted as a successful strategy for maximizing winter grip.
The Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 is widely regarded as a top-tier winter tire, consistently praised for its exceptional traction and confidence-inspiring performance on ice, deep snow, and slush. While users occasionally note increased road noise or less precise handling on dry pavement compared to all-season alternatives, the consensus remains that it is a premier choice for severe winter climates.
Pros
- Outstanding grip and acceleration on ice and hard-packed snow
- Excellent braking performance in hazardous winter conditions
- Strong capability in slush and deep snow
- High level of driver confidence in extreme weather
Cons
- Increased road noise during highway driving
- Less responsive or 'softer' handling feel on dry pavement
- Potential for minor rubbing depending on vehicle fitment
- Perceived as less refined in dry conditions compared to the previous WS80 generation
Observations
- Users operating rear-wheel-drive vehicles without modern traction control reported high satisfaction with the tire's ability to maintain mobility.
- Drivers of front-wheel-drive sedans noted significant improvements in winter handling and the ability to avoid using four-wheel-drive modes in moderate conditions.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT | B · Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | — | Winter Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | — | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 45 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 19″ |
| Tread depth | — | 11/32″ |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone
Bridgestone
Winner: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT — better snow, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT scores 99 vs 76 on snow.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT scores 89 vs 67 on wet.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT scores 85 vs 68 on dry.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT scores 86 vs 79 on treadwear.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.