Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 vs Goodyear UltraGrip Performance — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM005 | UltraGrip Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 89 | 86 |
| Tire Rack owners | 87 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 77 | 89 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) | 100% | 95% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) | 98% | 99% |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM005 | UltraGrip Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 91 | 84 |
| Tire Rack owners | 88 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 84 | 89 |
| Wet Braking (% of best) | 86% | 88% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) | 98% | 97% |
Snow
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM005 | UltraGrip Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 80 | 84 |
| Tire Rack owners | 81 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 72 | 95 |
| Snow Braking (% of best) | 99% | 98% |
| Snow Circle (% of best) | 91% | 96% |
| Snow Handling (% of best) | 97% | 99% |
| Snow Traction (% of best) | 76% | 94% |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM005 | UltraGrip Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 84 | 88 |
| Tire Rack owners | 81 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 74 | 83 |
Noise
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM005 | UltraGrip Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 63 | 62 |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM005 | UltraGrip Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 64 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 59 | 81 |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM005 | UltraGrip Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 73 | 88 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 | Goodyear UltraGrip Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 75 | 83 |
| Dry | 84 | 87 |
| Wet | 88 | 86 |
| Snow | 77 | 89 |
| Comfort | 80 | 86 |
| Noise | 63 | 62 |
| Treadwear | 59 | 81 |
| Handling | 73 | 88 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Tire A | Tire B | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Curved Aquaplaning | Curved | 97% #3/16 · 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tyre Test | 99% #2/9 · 2021 Tyre Reviews Winter Tyre Test | -1.9 | Different tests |
| Dry Braking | Dry | 100% #4/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tyre Test | 95% #6/13 · 2021 Auto Bild Sports Car Winter Tyre Test | +4.4 | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 98% #8/11 · 2023 Tyre Reviews Winter Tyre Test | 99% #11/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tyre Test | -0.4 | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 92% #5/20 · 2023 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | 86% #5/11 · 2019 AMS Winter SUV Tyre Test | +6.3 | Different tests |
| Fuel Consumption | Fuel | 98% #10/16 · 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tyre Test | 97% #4/15 · 2023 ADAC 17 inch Winter Tyre Test | +1.7 | Different tests |
| Ice Braking | Ice | 88% #15/15 · 2023 ADAC 17 inch Winter Tyre Test | 97% #7/15 · 2023 ADAC 17 inch Winter Tyre Test | -8.8 | Same test |
| Abrasion | Other | 100% #15/15 · 2023 ADAC 17 inch Winter Tyre Test | 68% #6/15 · 2023 ADAC 17 inch Winter Tyre Test | +32.3 | Same test |
| Noise | Other | 97% #4/6 · 2023/24 Tyre Reviews UHP Winter Tyre Test | 98% #8/9 · 2021 Tyre Reviews Winter Tyre Test | -1.2 | Different tests |
| Price | Other | 88% #8/10 · 2021 AZ SUV Winter Tyre Test | 84% #10/13 · 2021 Auto Bild Sports Car Winter Tyre Test | +3.7 | Different tests |
| Value | Other | 96% #17/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tyre Test | 70% #12/15 · 2023 ADAC 17 inch Winter Tyre Test | +26.1 | Different tests |
| Wear | Other | 69% #15/20 · 2021 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | 84% #4/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tyre Test | -14.7 | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 100% #1/15 · 2020 ADAC Winter Tyre Test - 205/55 R16 | 20% #5/9 · 2021 Tyre Reviews Winter Tyre Test | +80 | Different tests |
| Snow Braking | Snow | 99% #2/10 · 2022 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tyre Test | 98% #5/15 · 2023 ADAC 17 inch Winter Tyre Test | +0.9 | Different tests |
| Snow Circle | Snow | 91% #5/7 · 2023 AMS SUV Winter Tyre Test | 96% #5/9 · 2021 Tyre Reviews Winter Tyre Test | -4.8 | Different tests |
| Snow Handling | Snow | 97% #7/11 · 2019 AMS Winter SUV Tyre Test | 99% #7/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tyre Test | -1.6 | Different tests |
| Snow Traction | Snow | 76% #2/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Performance Winter Tyre Test | 94% #2/10 · 2020 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tyre Test | -18 | Different tests |
| Straight Aqua | Straight | 99% #2/8 · 2022 Auto Zeitung Winter Tyre Test | 100% #1/11 · 2019 19 Inch Performance Winter Tyre Test | -1.1 | Different tests |
| Subj. Comfort | Subj | 100% #2/11 · 2023 Tyre Reviews Winter Tyre Test | 98% #2/9 · 2021 Tyre Reviews Winter Tyre Test | +2 | Different tests |
| Subj. Dry Handling | Subj | 90% #2/14 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Winter Tyre Test | 80% #9/11 · 2019 AMS Winter SUV Tyre Test | +10 | Different tests |
| Subj. Snow Handling | Subj | 90% #6/11 · 2019 AMS Winter SUV Tyre Test | 100% #1/11 · 2019 AMS Winter SUV Tyre Test | -10 | Same test |
| Subj. Wet Handling | Subj | 100% #3/11 · 2019 AMS Winter SUV Tyre Test | 100% #4/11 · 2019 AMS Winter SUV Tyre Test | 0 | Same test |
| Total Cost of Ownership | Total | 0% #6/6 · 2023/24 Tyre Reviews UHP Winter Tyre Test | 0% #8/20 · 2022 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | 0 | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 86% #1/11 · 2019 AMS Winter SUV Tyre Test | 88% #10/48 · 2020 Winter Tyre Market Overview - 52 Tyre Braking Test | -2.1 | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 98% #2/7 · 2022 Sport Auto All Season Tyre Test | 97% #10/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Performance Winter Tyre Test | +1.2 | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 is widely regarded as a class-leading winter tire for wet and slushy conditions, offering exceptional grip and braking performance that rivals summer tires. While it performs reliably in fresh snow, user consensus indicates a significant decline in performance and tread life after the first two seasons, with many owners reporting premature wear and increased noise levels as the tire ages.
Pros
- Exceptional wet-weather grip and aquaplaning resistance.
- Predictable and stable handling on dry roads.
- Strong performance in slush and fresh snow when new.
- High levels of ride comfort and low noise levels during the initial phase of ownership.
Cons
- Rapid and premature tread wear, often failing to last beyond 15,000–20,000 km.
- Significant performance degradation in snow and ice after the first or second season.
- Development of loud humming or buzzing noises as the tire ages.
- Reports of tread deformation, wobbly blocks, or uneven wear patterns.
Observations
- Heavy vehicles, including EVs and large SUVs, appear to accelerate the rapid tread wear observed by many users.
- Users with RWD vehicles noted that while the tire is predictable, it can struggle with traction on steep inclines once the tread depth drops below 5mm.
- Drivers of performance-oriented or heavier cars reported noticeable understeer during spirited driving in dry conditions.
The Goodyear UltraGrip Performance is highly regarded by users for its exceptional traction in snow and wet conditions, often described as offering near-summer tire performance on dry pavement. While the majority of users praise its longevity and consistent winter capability, some note a slight increase in noise and fuel consumption during warmer temperatures.
Pros
- Exceptional snow and ice traction
- Strong performance in wet and dry conditions
- High tread longevity and durability
- Well-mannered handling in varied winter weather
Cons
- Increased road noise in warmer conditions
- Slightly higher fuel consumption
- Limited performance on pure ice surfaces
- High initial price point
Observations
- Users report consistent, reliable performance across diverse vehicle types, including compact cars like the Renault Megane and performance-oriented vehicles like the Mercedes SLK.
- The tire demonstrates significant longevity, with some users reporting up to five seasons of use before requiring replacement.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 | B · Goodyear UltraGrip Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter Premium Touring tires | Winter Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 11 | — |
| Rim diameters | 17″ – 21″ | — |
| Tread depth | 9/32″ | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 50 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone
Goodyear
Winner: Goodyear UltraGrip Performance — better treadwear, handling and snow. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance scores 81 vs 59 on treadwear.
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance scores 88 vs 73 on handling.
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance scores 89 vs 77 on snow.
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance scores 86 vs 80 on comfort.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.