Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 vs Hankook Winter i cept evo3 — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Bridgestone

Bridgestone Blizzak LM005

Winter Premium Touring tires

Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
96/100
35 professional tests
User signal (40%)
71/100
110 owner reviews
Dry
84
Wet
88
Snow
77
Comfort
80
Noise
63
Treadwear
59
Handling
73

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Hankook

Hankook Winter i cept evo3

Winter Ultra High Performance tires

Hankook Winter i cept evo3 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
90/100
20 professional tests
User signal (40%)
86/100
22 owner reviews
Dry
89
Wet
87
Snow
84
Comfort
80
Noise
81
Treadwear
88
Handling
83

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Hankook Winter i cept evo3 — better treadwear, noise and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Winter i cept evo3 leads by 5
A — Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
84
B — Hankook Winter i cept evo3
89
Why this score
SourceBlizzak LM005Winter i cept evo3
Professional tests (TWG score) 89 89
Tire Rack owners 87 –
Tyre Reviews owners 77 89
Dry Braking (% of best) 92% 93%
Dry Handling (% of best) 99% 99%

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Blizzak LM005 leads by 1
A — Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
88
B — Hankook Winter i cept evo3
87
Why this score
SourceBlizzak LM005Winter i cept evo3
Professional tests (TWG score) 91 85
Tire Rack owners 88 –
Tyre Reviews owners 84 90
Wet Braking (% of best) 91% 96%
Wet Braking - Concrete (% of best) 81% 71%
Wet Braking - Cool (% of best) 91% 97%
Wet Braking - Worn (% of best) 77% 82%
Wet Circle (% of best) 99% 45%
Wet Handling (% of best) 97% 99%

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Winter i cept evo3 leads by 7
A — Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
77
B — Hankook Winter i cept evo3
84
Why this score
SourceBlizzak LM005Winter i cept evo3
Professional tests (TWG score) 80 77
Tire Rack owners 81 –
Tyre Reviews owners 72 93
Snow Braking (% of best) 97% 96%
Snow Circle (% of best) 99% 96%
Snow Handling (% of best) 98% 100%
Snow Slalom (% of best) 100% 93%
Snow Traction (% of best) 96% 92%

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
80
B — Hankook Winter i cept evo3
80
Why this score
SourceBlizzak LM005Winter i cept evo3
Professional tests (TWG score) 84 81
Tire Rack owners 81 –
Tyre Reviews owners 74 77

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Winter i cept evo3 leads by 18
A — Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
63
B — Hankook Winter i cept evo3
81
Why this score
SourceBlizzak LM005Winter i cept evo3
Professional tests (TWG score) 63 81

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Winter i cept evo3 leads by 29
A — Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
59
B — Hankook Winter i cept evo3
88
Why this score
SourceBlizzak LM005Winter i cept evo3
Tire Rack owners 64 –
Tyre Reviews owners 59 88

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Winter i cept evo3 leads by 10
A — Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
73
B — Hankook Winter i cept evo3
83
Why this score
SourceBlizzak LM005Winter i cept evo3
Tyre Reviews owners 73 83

Scores at a glance

Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 vs Hankook Winter i cept evo3: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone Blizzak LM005Hankook Winter i cept evo3
Relative Score 75 85
Dry 84 89
Wet 88 87
Snow 77 84
Comfort 80 80
Noise 63 81
Treadwear 59 88
Handling 73 83

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Test data

The professional test results behind the scores

Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.

DisciplineCategoryTire ATire BΔBoth?
Curved Aquaplaning Curved 90% #4/9 · 2022/23 Tyre Reviews Winter Tyre Test 99% #3/9 · 2021 Tyre Reviews Winter Tyre Test -9.1 Different tests
Dry Braking Dry 92% #10/10 · 2022 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tyre Test 93% #9/10 · 2022 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tyre Test -0.8 Same test
Dry Handling Dry 99% #8/11 · 2019 AMS Winter SUV Tyre Test 99% #4/6 · 2025 High Performance Winter Tyre Test 0 Different tests
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 88% #7/20 · 2021 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test 91% #7/13 · 2021 Auto Bild Sports Car Winter Tyre Test -2.4 Different tests
Fuel Consumption Fuel 98% #10/16 · 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tyre Test 95% #10/31 · 2025 ADAC Winter Tyre Test +3.3 Different tests
Ice Braking Ice 88% #15/15 · 2023 ADAC 17 inch Winter Tyre Test 87% #21/31 · 2025 ADAC Winter Tyre Test +0.9 Different tests
Abrasion Other 100% #15/15 · 2023 ADAC 17 inch Winter Tyre Test 64% #4/31 · 2025 ADAC Winter Tyre Test +36.4 Different tests
Noise Other 92% #6/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tyre Test 93% #6/6 · 2025 High Performance Winter Tyre Test -1 Different tests
Price Other 73% #7/10 · 2021 AMS Winter Tyre Test 71% #4/13 · 2021 Auto Bild Sports Car Winter Tyre Test +2.3 Different tests
Value Other 96% #17/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tyre Test 61% #4/20 · 2025 Autobild Winter Tyre Test +34.8 Different tests
Wear Other 62% #16/16 · 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tyre Test 98% #3/20 · 2025 Autobild Winter Tyre Test -36.2 Different tests
Overall Ranking Overall 14% #7/16 · 2021 ADAC 15 Inch Winter Tyre Test 17% #6/9 · 2023 Sport Auto Winter Tyre Test -2.4 Different tests
Snow Braking Snow 97% #3/7 · 2023 AMS SUV Winter Tyre Test 96% #6/20 · 2023 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test +0.5 Different tests
Snow Circle Snow 99% #6/10 · 2024 All Season and Winter Tyre Test 96% #3/9 · 2021 Tyre Reviews Winter Tyre Test +3.1 Different tests
Snow Handling Snow 98% #7/10 · 2020 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tyre Test 100% #2/13 · 2021 Auto Bild Sports Car Winter Tyre Test -1.8 Different tests
Snow Slalom Snow 100% #1/7 · 2022 Sport Auto All Season Tyre Test 93% #8/9 · 2023 Sport Auto Winter Tyre Test +7 Different tests
Snow Traction Snow 96% #6/7 · 2023 AMS SUV Winter Tyre Test 92% #6/6 · The BEST Performance Winter Tyres for 2024 / 2025 +4.2 Different tests
Straight Aqua Straight 98% #3/10 · 2024 Auto Bild Sportscars Winter Tyre Test 96% #5/9 · 2021 Tyre Reviews Winter Tyre Test +1.6 Different tests
Subj. Comfort Subj 100% #2/11 · 2023 Tyre Reviews Winter Tyre Test 95% #6/11 · 2023 Tyre Reviews Winter Tyre Test +5 Same test
Total Cost of Ownership Total 0% #18/20 · 2023 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test 0% #3/6 · 2023/24 Tyre Reviews UHP Winter Tyre Test 0 Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 91% #1/7 · 2023 AMS SUV Winter Tyre Test 96% #3/6 · 2025 High Performance Winter Tyre Test -4.9 Different tests
Wet Braking - Concrete Wet 81% #1/16 · 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tyre Test 71% #6/31 · 2025 ADAC Winter Tyre Test +10 Different tests
Wet Braking - Cool Wet 91% #1/6 · 2023/24 Tyre Reviews UHP Winter Tyre Test 97% #5/6 · 2023/24 Tyre Reviews UHP Winter Tyre Test -6.5 Same test
Wet Braking - Worn Wet 77% #1/6 · 2023/24 Tyre Reviews UHP Winter Tyre Test 82% #4/6 · 2023/24 Tyre Reviews UHP Winter Tyre Test -4.5 Same test
Wet Circle Wet 99% #2/10 · 2022 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tyre Test 45% #6/30 · 2025 ADAC Winter Tyre Test +54.4 Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 97% #1/10 · 2024 All Season and Winter Tyre Test 99% #4/13 · 2021 Auto Bild Sports Car Winter Tyre Test -1.3 Different tests
From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Bridgestone Blizzak LM005

The Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 is widely regarded as a class-leading winter tire for wet and slushy conditions, offering exceptional grip and braking performance that rivals summer tires. While it performs reliably in fresh snow, user consensus indicates a significant decline in performance and tread life after the first two seasons, with many owners reporting premature wear and increased noise levels as the tire ages.

Pros

  • Exceptional wet-weather grip and aquaplaning resistance.
  • Predictable and stable handling on dry roads.
  • Strong performance in slush and fresh snow when new.
  • High levels of ride comfort and low noise levels during the initial phase of ownership.

Cons

  • Rapid and premature tread wear, often failing to last beyond 15,000–20,000 km.
  • Significant performance degradation in snow and ice after the first or second season.
  • Development of loud humming or buzzing noises as the tire ages.
  • Reports of tread deformation, wobbly blocks, or uneven wear patterns.

Observations

  • Heavy vehicles, including EVs and large SUVs, appear to accelerate the rapid tread wear observed by many users.
  • Users with RWD vehicles noted that while the tire is predictable, it can struggle with traction on steep inclines once the tread depth drops below 5mm.
  • Drivers of performance-oriented or heavier cars reported noticeable understeer during spirited driving in dry conditions.
Tire B Hankook Winter i cept evo3

The Hankook Winter i cept evo3 is widely regarded as a high-performance winter tire that offers exceptional value, frequently outperforming more expensive premium brands in wet and snowy conditions. While most users praise its balanced handling and impressive aquaplaning resistance, a small minority of drivers report concerns regarding ride comfort and noise levels.

Pros

  • Exceptional wet weather performance and aquaplaning resistance
  • Strong traction and confidence-inspiring grip in deep snow and ice
  • Excellent value-for-money proposition compared to premium competitors
  • Stable and predictable handling on dry and cold pavement

Cons

  • Reports of increased road noise compared to summer tires
  • Mixed feedback regarding ride comfort, with some users finding them stiff
  • Occasional reports of suboptimal launch traction in wet conditions

Observations

  • Drivers of performance-oriented vehicles (e.g., Ford Puma ST) noted that the tire maintains sporty characteristics without significant compromise.
  • Users with AWD vehicles (e.g., Audi A4 Allroad) highlighted superior stability in deep water and snow, though some RWD users noted the importance of fitting all four tires to prevent rear-end instability.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 B · Hankook Winter i cept evo3
CategoryWinter Premium Touring tiresWinter Ultra High Performance tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available11—
Rim diameters17″ – 21″—
Tread depth9/32″—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure50 psi—
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone

Hankook

Winner: Hankook Winter i cept evo3 — better treadwear, noise and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Hankook Winter i cept evo3 scores 88 vs 59 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Hankook Winter i cept evo3 scores 81 vs 63 on noise.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Hankook Winter i cept evo3 scores 83 vs 73 on handling.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Hankook Winter i cept evo3 scores 84 vs 77 on snow.

Tire A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
Tire B · Hankook Winter i cept evo3

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.