75
/ 100
Objective (60%)
96/100
35 professional tests
User signal (40%)
71/100
110 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 vs Michelin Alpin 6 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
84
/ 100
Objective (60%)
89/100
19 professional tests
User signal (40%)
85/100
35 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Michelin Alpin 6 — better treadwear, handling and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM005 | Alpin 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 89 | 80 |
| Tire Rack owners | 87 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 77 | 89 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) | 97% | 92% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) | 98% | 99% |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Blizzak LM005 leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM005 | Alpin 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 91 | 84 |
| Tire Rack owners | 88 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 84 | 91 |
| Wet Braking (% of best) | 100% | 92% |
| Wet Braking - Concrete (% of best) | 81% | 84% |
| Wet Circle (% of best) | 100% | 96% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) | 95% | 99% |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Alpin 6 leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM005 | Alpin 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 80 | 79 |
| Tire Rack owners | 81 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 72 | 81 |
| Snow Braking (% of best) | 96% | 97% |
| Snow Circle (% of best) | 91% | 99% |
| Snow Handling (% of best) | 97% | 98% |
| Snow Traction (% of best) | 93% | 86% |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Alpin 6 leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM005 | Alpin 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 84 | 90 |
| Tire Rack owners | 81 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 74 | 90 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Alpin 6 leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM005 | Alpin 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 63 | 73 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Alpin 6 leads by 28
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM005 | Alpin 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 64 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 59 | 87 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Alpin 6 leads by 11
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM005 | Alpin 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 73 | 84 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 | Michelin Alpin 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 75 | 84 |
| Dry | 84 | 84 |
| Wet | 88 | 87 |
| Snow | 77 | 80 |
| Comfort | 80 | 90 |
| Noise | 63 | 73 |
| Treadwear | 59 | 87 |
| Handling | 73 | 84 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
75
/ 100
Tire A
84
/ 100
Tire B
Test data
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Tire A | Tire B | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Curved Aquaplaning | Curved | 100% #1/9 · 2021 Tyre Reviews Winter Tyre Test | 86% #8/12 · 2024 ADAC 16 Inch Winter Tyre Test | +13.5 | Different tests |
| Dry Braking | Dry | 97% #6/10 · 2021 AZ SUV Winter Tyre Test | 92% #1/10 · 2021 AMS Winter Tyre Test | +4.6 | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 98% #7/7 · 2022 Sport Auto All Season Tyre Test | 99% #11/20 · 2021 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | -0.6 | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 80% #8/20 · 2022 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | 87% #14/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tyre Test | -6.4 | Different tests |
| Fuel Consumption | Fuel | 98% #10/16 · 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tyre Test | 100% #7/12 · 2024 ADAC 16 Inch Winter Tyre Test | -1.7 | Different tests |
| Ice Braking | Ice | 89% #12/16 · 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tyre Test | 88% #10/12 · 2024 ADAC 16 Inch Winter Tyre Test | +0.6 | Different tests |
| Abrasion | Other | 92% #14/16 · 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tyre Test | 57% #1/15 · 2023 ADAC 17 inch Winter Tyre Test | +35.4 | Different tests |
| Noise | Other | 92% #6/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tyre Test | 98% #16/20 · 2022 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | -6.2 | Different tests |
| Price | Other | 91% #18/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tyre Test | 46% #11/11 · 2019 AMS Winter SUV Tyre Test | +45.3 | Different tests |
| Value | Other | 100% #6/6 · 2023/24 Tyre Reviews UHP Winter Tyre Test | 87% #11/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tyre Test | +13.2 | Different tests |
| Wear | Other | 76% #15/20 · 2023 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | 100% #1/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tyre Test | -24.3 | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 20% #5/10 · 2024 Auto Bild Sportscars Winter Tyre Test | 20% #5/55 · 2024 Winter 55 Tyre Braking Test | 0 | Different tests |
| Snow Braking | Snow | 96% #3/10 · 2021 AMS Winter Tyre Test | 97% #14/30 · 2019 Winter Tyre Test Market Overview | -1.2 | Different tests |
| Snow Circle | Snow | 91% #5/7 · 2023 AMS SUV Winter Tyre Test | 99% #5/10 · 2024 All Season and Winter Tyre Test | -7.7 | Different tests |
| Snow Handling | Snow | 97% #4/8 · 2022 AMS Winter Tyre Test | 98% #10/20 · 2021 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | -0.8 | Different tests |
| Snow Traction | Snow | 93% #4/10 · 2021 AMS Winter Tyre Test | 86% #3/16 · 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tyre Test | +7.2 | Different tests |
| Straight Aqua | Straight | 96% #6/9 · 2021 Tyre Reviews Winter Tyre Test | 95% #6/10 · 2024 All Season and Winter Tyre Test | +0.5 | Different tests |
| Subj. Comfort | Subj | 90% #6/11 · 2019 AMS Winter SUV Tyre Test | 88% #3/8 · 2022 Auto Zeitung Winter Tyre Test | +2.5 | Different tests |
| Subj. Dry Handling | Subj | 90% #2/14 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Winter Tyre Test | 50% #9/14 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Winter Tyre Test | +40 | Same test |
| Subj. Snow Handling | Subj | 90% #6/11 · 2019 AMS Winter SUV Tyre Test | 90% #5/11 · 2019 AMS Winter SUV Tyre Test | 0 | Same test |
| Subj. Wet Handling | Subj | 100% #3/11 · 2019 AMS Winter SUV Tyre Test | 100% #2/11 · 2019 AMS Winter SUV Tyre Test | 0 | Same test |
| Total Cost of Ownership | Total | 0% #6/6 · 2023/24 Tyre Reviews UHP Winter Tyre Test | 0% #9/20 · 2022 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | 0 | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 100% #1/9 · 2022 Sports Car UHP Winter Tyre Test | 92% #7/11 · 2019 AMS Winter SUV Tyre Test | +7.5 | Different tests |
| Wet Braking - Concrete | Wet | 81% #1/16 · 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tyre Test | 84% #3/12 · 2024 ADAC 16 Inch Winter Tyre Test | -3.2 | Different tests |
| Wet Circle | Wet | 100% #1/10 · 2024 All Season and Winter Tyre Test | 96% #10/10 · 2024 All Season and Winter Tyre Test | +4 | Same test |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 95% #4/10 · 2021 AZ SUV Winter Tyre Test | 99% #3/20 · 2024 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | -3.9 | Different tests |
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 is widely regarded as a class-leading winter tire for wet and slushy conditions, offering exceptional grip and braking performance that rivals summer tires. While it performs reliably in fresh snow, user consensus indicates a significant decline in performance and tread life after the first two seasons, with many owners reporting premature wear and increased noise levels as the tire ages.
Pros
- Exceptional wet-weather grip and aquaplaning resistance.
- Predictable and stable handling on dry roads.
- Strong performance in slush and fresh snow when new.
- High levels of ride comfort and low noise levels during the initial phase of ownership.
Cons
- Rapid and premature tread wear, often failing to last beyond 15,000–20,000 km.
- Significant performance degradation in snow and ice after the first or second season.
- Development of loud humming or buzzing noises as the tire ages.
- Reports of tread deformation, wobbly blocks, or uneven wear patterns.
Observations
- Heavy vehicles, including EVs and large SUVs, appear to accelerate the rapid tread wear observed by many users.
- Users with RWD vehicles noted that while the tire is predictable, it can struggle with traction on steep inclines once the tread depth drops below 5mm.
- Drivers of performance-oriented or heavier cars reported noticeable understeer during spirited driving in dry conditions.
The Michelin Alpin 6 is widely regarded as a premium, highly comfortable winter tire that excels in wet and dry cold-weather conditions. While many users praise its longevity and consistent performance, there is a notable divide in user experience regarding its deep snow and ice traction, with some drivers finding it less capable than key competitors like the Continental WinterContact series.
Pros
- Exceptional wet and dry road grip in cold temperatures
- High levels of ride comfort and low cabin noise
- Impressive tread life and long-term durability
- Stable and predictable handling on motorways
Cons
- Inconsistent performance in deep snow and on ice
- Some reports of sluggish steering feedback or 'soft' sidewall feel
- Higher price point compared to some performance-oriented winter alternatives
- Occasional reports of reduced traction after multiple seasons of use
Observations
- Users with RWD vehicles, such as the BMW 5 Series, noted excellent snow traction, though some experienced minor grip limitations during hard acceleration on dry pavement.
- Drivers using smaller rim sizes (e.g., 185/65-R15) reported highly positive feedback regarding handling and road feel compared to larger, more performance-oriented setups.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 | B · Michelin Alpin 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter Premium Touring tires | Winter Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 11 | — |
| Rim diameters | 17″ – 21″ | — |
| Tread depth | 9/32″ | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 50 psi | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
75
/ 100
Bridgestone
84
/ 100
Michelin
Winner: Michelin Alpin 6 — better treadwear, handling and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Michelin Alpin 6 scores 87 vs 59 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Michelin Alpin 6 scores 84 vs 73 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Michelin Alpin 6 scores 90 vs 80 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You want a quieter cabin
Michelin Alpin 6 scores 73 vs 63 on noise.
Tire A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
Tire B · Michelin Alpin 6
More comparisons
Also compared with
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 also compared with
Michelin Alpin 6 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.