62
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
60/100
8 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Bridgestone Ecopia EP100 vs Yokohama Geolandar G98A — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
62
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
60/100
15 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictToo close to call: Bridgestone Ecopia EP100 and Yokohama Geolandar G98A are within 2 points overall. Bridgestone Ecopia EP100 is stronger on treadwear. Yokohama Geolandar G98A is stronger on handling, wet and dry.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Geolandar G98A leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | Ecopia EP100 | Geolandar G98A |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 69 | 74 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Geolandar G98A leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | Ecopia EP100 | Geolandar G98A |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 60 | 67 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Ecopia EP100 leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | Ecopia EP100 | Geolandar G98A |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 63 | 61 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Ecopia EP100 leads by 15
Why this score
| Source | Ecopia EP100 | Geolandar G98A |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 64 | 49 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Geolandar G98A leads by 15
Why this score
| Source | Ecopia EP100 | Geolandar G98A |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 53 | 68 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Ecopia EP100 | Yokohama Geolandar G98A |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 62 | 62 |
| Dry | 69 | 74 |
| Wet | 60 | 67 |
| Comfort | 63 | 61 |
| Treadwear | 64 | 49 |
| Handling | 53 | 68 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
62
/ 100
Tire A
62
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Ecopia EP100 is generally perceived as a competent, budget-friendly tire for sedate, daily commuting, offering notable fuel efficiency and longevity. However, it receives significant criticism from drivers seeking performance, as its soft sidewalls and lack of lateral stability lead to poor handling characteristics and audible squealing during cornering.
Pros
- High fuel efficiency due to low rolling resistance
- Impressive tread life and durability for daily driving
- Smooth and quiet ride quality on motorways
- Good value for money for non-performance oriented drivers
Cons
- Poor handling and stability during cornering
- Excessive tire squeal at low speeds
- Soft sidewalls causing a 'wallowing' or 'squirming' sensation
- Harsh ride quality reported by some users on specific vehicle setups
Observations
- Users noted that the tire's performance is adequate for standard sedans like the Camry but lacks the precision required for spirited driving.
- Drivers transitioning from wider tires (e.g., 215 to 205 width) reported a noticeable increase in rolling efficiency, though handling trade-offs remained.
The Yokohama Geolandar G98A is generally regarded as a mediocre OEM tire that provides acceptable dry-road handling and comfort for daily commuting. However, it is widely criticized for its premature tread wear and inconsistent performance in wet or wintry conditions, leading to a low rate of repeat purchase among owners.
Pros
- Satisfactory dry-road grip and handling
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Decent fuel efficiency
- Predictable steering feedback under normal conditions
Cons
- Significantly premature tread wear
- Poor traction and instability in wet conditions
- Unsafe performance in snow and icy environments
- High price-to-longevity ratio
Observations
- Users of Mazda CX-5 and CX-8 models frequently report the tire reaching the end of its service life between 20,000 and 30,000 kilometers.
- Some owners noted structural issues such as premature cracking or bursting of the sidewalls within 20,000 miles of use.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Ecopia EP100 | B · Yokohama Geolandar G98A |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
62
/ 100
Bridgestone
62
/ 100
Yokohama
Too close to call: Bridgestone Ecopia EP100 and Yokohama Geolandar G98A are within 2 points overall. Bridgestone Ecopia EP100 is stronger on treadwear. Yokohama Geolandar G98A is stronger on handling, wet and dry.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Bridgestone Ecopia EP100 scores 64 vs 49 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Yokohama Geolandar G98A scores 68 vs 53 on handling.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Yokohama Geolandar G98A scores 67 vs 60 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Yokohama Geolandar G98A scores 74 vs 69 on dry.
Tire A · Bridgestone Ecopia EP100
Tire B · Yokohama Geolandar G98A
More comparisons
Also compared with
Bridgestone Ecopia EP100 also compared with
Yokohama Geolandar G98A also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.