Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Yokohama Geolandar G98A — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | CrossContact LX25 | Geolandar G98A |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 71 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 93 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 93 | 74 |
| SimpleTire owners | 99 | – |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | CrossContact LX25 | Geolandar G98A |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 92 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 93 | 67 |
| SimpleTire owners | 93 | – |
Snow
Why this score
| Source | CrossContact LX25 | Geolandar G98A |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 100 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 83 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | – |
| SimpleTire owners | 86 | – |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | CrossContact LX25 | Geolandar G98A |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 90 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 97 | 61 |
| SimpleTire owners | 95 | – |
Noise
Why this score
| Source | CrossContact LX25 | Geolandar G98A |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleTire owners | 94 | – |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | CrossContact LX25 | Geolandar G98A |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 91 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 93 | 49 |
| SimpleTire owners | 89 | – |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | CrossContact LX25 | Geolandar G98A |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 68 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental CrossContact LX25 | Yokohama Geolandar G98A |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 89 | 62 |
| Dry | 82 | 74 |
| Wet | 92 | 67 |
| Snow | 94 | – |
| Comfort | 94 | 61 |
| Noise | 93 | – |
| Treadwear | 89 | 49 |
| Handling | 85 | 68 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Continental CrossContact LX25 is highly regarded by users for its exceptional ride comfort, low noise levels, and reliable all-season traction. It is frequently cited as a superior replacement for factory-installed tires, offering a balanced performance profile that excels in daily driving conditions across various climates.
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and quiet operation
- Significantly improved braking performance
- Predictable and confident handling in light snow and wet conditions
- Strong value proposition compared to premium factory-installed alternatives
Cons
- Tendency to pick up and eject road gravel
- Occasional reports of premature tread wear in specific use cases
- Stiffer sidewall response when encountering sharp road imperfections or deep potholes
Observations
- Luxury SUV owners (Mercedes ML/GLE) report a significant improvement in ride quality and cabin noise when replacing factory run-flat tires with the LX25.
- Users with 19-inch wheel configurations on compact crossovers like the Mazda CX-5 find the tire to be a reliable solution for challenging New England weather conditions.
The Yokohama Geolandar G98A is generally regarded as a mediocre OEM tire that provides acceptable dry-road handling and comfort for daily commuting. However, it is widely criticized for its premature tread wear and inconsistent performance in wet or wintry conditions, leading to a low rate of repeat purchase among owners.
Pros
- Satisfactory dry-road grip and handling
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Decent fuel efficiency
- Predictable steering feedback under normal conditions
Cons
- Significantly premature tread wear
- Poor traction and instability in wet conditions
- Unsafe performance in snow and icy environments
- High price-to-longevity ratio
Observations
- Users of Mazda CX-5 and CX-8 models frequently report the tire reaching the end of its service life between 20,000 and 30,000 kilometers.
- Some owners noted structural issues such as premature cracking or bursting of the sidewalls within 20,000 miles of use.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental CrossContact LX25 | B · Yokohama Geolandar G98A |
|---|---|---|
| Category | — | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | — | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 40 | — |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 22″ | — |
| Tread depth | 10 - 12/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 740 A A - B | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering | — |
| Max pressure | 44 - 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental
Yokohama
Winner: Continental CrossContact LX25 — better treadwear, comfort and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 89 vs 49 on treadwear.
Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 94 vs 61 on comfort.
Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 92 vs 67 on wet.
Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 85 vs 68 on handling.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.