Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 vs Yokohama Geolandar G98A — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Falken

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210

All Season Premium Touring tires

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
83/100
18 professional tests
User signal (40%)
81/100
31 owner reviews
Dry
80
Wet
84
Snow
75
Comfort
81
Noise
89
Treadwear
86
Handling
81

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Yokohama

Yokohama Geolandar G98A

Summer Premium Touring tires

Yokohama Geolandar G98A tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
60/100
15 owner reviews
Dry
74
Wet
67
Snow
–
Comfort
61
Noise
–
Treadwear
49
Handling
68

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 — better treadwear, comfort and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) EUROALL SEASON AS210 leads by 6
A — Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
80
B — Yokohama Geolandar G98A
74
Why this score
SourceEUROALL SEASON AS210Geolandar G98A
Professional tests (TWG score) 77 –
Tyre Reviews owners 85 74

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) EUROALL SEASON AS210 leads by 17
A — Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
84
B — Yokohama Geolandar G98A
67
Why this score
SourceEUROALL SEASON AS210Geolandar G98A
Professional tests (TWG score) 83 –
Tyre Reviews owners 86 67

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
75
B — Yokohama Geolandar G98A
–
Why this score
SourceEUROALL SEASON AS210Geolandar G98A
Professional tests (TWG score) 72 –
Tyre Reviews owners 81 –

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) EUROALL SEASON AS210 leads by 20
A — Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
81
B — Yokohama Geolandar G98A
61
Why this score
SourceEUROALL SEASON AS210Geolandar G98A
Professional tests (TWG score) 82 –
Tyre Reviews owners 80 61

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
89
B — Yokohama Geolandar G98A
–
Why this score
SourceEUROALL SEASON AS210Geolandar G98A
Professional tests (TWG score) 89 –

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) EUROALL SEASON AS210 leads by 37
A — Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
86
B — Yokohama Geolandar G98A
49
Why this score
SourceEUROALL SEASON AS210Geolandar G98A
Tyre Reviews owners 86 49

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) EUROALL SEASON AS210 leads by 13
A — Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
81
B — Yokohama Geolandar G98A
68
Why this score
SourceEUROALL SEASON AS210Geolandar G98A
Tyre Reviews owners 81 68
DriverReviews owners 82 –

Scores at a glance

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 vs Yokohama Geolandar G98A: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFalken EUROALL SEASON AS210Yokohama Geolandar G98A
Relative Score 83 62
Dry 80 74
Wet 84 67
Snow 75 –
Comfort 81 61
Noise 89 –
Treadwear 86 49
Handling 81 68

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210

The Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 is widely regarded as a high-value, winter-biased all-season tire that excels in cold, wet, and snowy conditions. While users frequently praise its impressive grip and safety in adverse weather, some report trade-offs in the form of increased road noise, higher rolling resistance, and a slightly vague steering feel compared to dedicated summer tires.

Pros

  • Excellent traction and confidence in snow, ice, and cold wet conditions
  • Strong value-for-money proposition compared to premium competitors
  • High durability and long tread life for many users
  • Comfortable ride quality, particularly on vehicles with higher-profile tires

Cons

  • Increased road noise reported by a significant subset of users
  • Noticeable impact on fuel economy and rolling resistance
  • Vague or 'spongy' steering response during spirited dry-weather driving
  • Inconsistent performance in deep standing water for some drivers

Observations

  • Users with high-sidewall tire sizes (e.g., 16-inch) report a very comfortable, compliant ride, while those on larger or sportier setups may find the handling too soft.
  • Drivers of heavier vehicles or SUVs (like the Hyundai ix35) report high satisfaction with the tire's year-round stability and towing performance.
Tire B Yokohama Geolandar G98A

The Yokohama Geolandar G98A is generally regarded as a mediocre OEM tire that provides acceptable dry-road handling and comfort for daily commuting. However, it is widely criticized for its premature tread wear and inconsistent performance in wet or wintry conditions, leading to a low rate of repeat purchase among owners.

Pros

  • Satisfactory dry-road grip and handling
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Decent fuel efficiency
  • Predictable steering feedback under normal conditions

Cons

  • Significantly premature tread wear
  • Poor traction and instability in wet conditions
  • Unsafe performance in snow and icy environments
  • High price-to-longevity ratio

Observations

  • Users of Mazda CX-5 and CX-8 models frequently report the tire reaching the end of its service life between 20,000 and 30,000 kilometers.
  • Some owners noted structural issues such as premature cracking or bursting of the sidewalls within 20,000 miles of use.
Community buzz

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210

Mixed

Community discussions regarding the Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 often revolve around comparing its EU label ratings (such as wet grip and fuel economy) against dedicated summer tyres or alternative brands like Hankook and Goodyear. Users weigh the benefits of having an all-season tyre capability against specific performance metrics and budget constraints for various vehicles.

Top themes
#EU tire label ratings#All-season vs summer tires#Wet grip performance#Budget and pricing#Brand comparisons#Tread mix and matching

Based on 9 community posts

Tire B

Yokohama Geolandar G98A

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 B · Yokohama Geolandar G98A
CategoryAll Season Premium Touring tiresSummer Premium Touring tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Falken

Yokohama

Winner: Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 — better treadwear, comfort and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 scores 86 vs 49 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 scores 81 vs 61 on comfort.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 scores 84 vs 67 on wet.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 scores 81 vs 68 on handling.

Tire A · Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
Tire B · Yokohama Geolandar G98A

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.