Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 vs Yokohama Geolandar G98A — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | EUROALL SEASON AS210 | Geolandar G98A |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 77 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 74 |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | EUROALL SEASON AS210 | Geolandar G98A |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 83 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 86 | 67 |
Snow
Why this score
| Source | EUROALL SEASON AS210 | Geolandar G98A |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 72 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 81 | – |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | EUROALL SEASON AS210 | Geolandar G98A |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 82 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 61 |
Noise
Why this score
| Source | EUROALL SEASON AS210 | Geolandar G98A |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 89 | – |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | EUROALL SEASON AS210 | Geolandar G98A |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 86 | 49 |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | EUROALL SEASON AS210 | Geolandar G98A |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 81 | 68 |
| DriverReviews owners | 82 | – |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 | Yokohama Geolandar G98A |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 83 | 62 |
| Dry | 80 | 74 |
| Wet | 84 | 67 |
| Snow | 75 | – |
| Comfort | 81 | 61 |
| Noise | 89 | – |
| Treadwear | 86 | 49 |
| Handling | 81 | 68 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 is widely regarded as a high-value, winter-biased all-season tire that excels in cold, wet, and snowy conditions. While users frequently praise its impressive grip and safety in adverse weather, some report trade-offs in the form of increased road noise, higher rolling resistance, and a slightly vague steering feel compared to dedicated summer tires.
Pros
- Excellent traction and confidence in snow, ice, and cold wet conditions
- Strong value-for-money proposition compared to premium competitors
- High durability and long tread life for many users
- Comfortable ride quality, particularly on vehicles with higher-profile tires
Cons
- Increased road noise reported by a significant subset of users
- Noticeable impact on fuel economy and rolling resistance
- Vague or 'spongy' steering response during spirited dry-weather driving
- Inconsistent performance in deep standing water for some drivers
Observations
- Users with high-sidewall tire sizes (e.g., 16-inch) report a very comfortable, compliant ride, while those on larger or sportier setups may find the handling too soft.
- Drivers of heavier vehicles or SUVs (like the Hyundai ix35) report high satisfaction with the tire's year-round stability and towing performance.
The Yokohama Geolandar G98A is generally regarded as a mediocre OEM tire that provides acceptable dry-road handling and comfort for daily commuting. However, it is widely criticized for its premature tread wear and inconsistent performance in wet or wintry conditions, leading to a low rate of repeat purchase among owners.
Pros
- Satisfactory dry-road grip and handling
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Decent fuel efficiency
- Predictable steering feedback under normal conditions
Cons
- Significantly premature tread wear
- Poor traction and instability in wet conditions
- Unsafe performance in snow and icy environments
- High price-to-longevity ratio
Observations
- Users of Mazda CX-5 and CX-8 models frequently report the tire reaching the end of its service life between 20,000 and 30,000 kilometers.
- Some owners noted structural issues such as premature cracking or bursting of the sidewalls within 20,000 miles of use.
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
Community discussions regarding the Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 often revolve around comparing its EU label ratings (such as wet grip and fuel economy) against dedicated summer tyres or alternative brands like Hankook and Goodyear. Users weigh the benefits of having an all-season tyre capability against specific performance metrics and budget constraints for various vehicles.
“All Season tyre vs Summer tyre with better wet grip? I’ve always just assumed that All Season tyres are going to be better for driving in wet conditions than the equivalent summer tyre, but now I’m confused. See these Falken tyres for example: Falken Sincera SN 110 - EU Wet Grip class A. Falken Euroall Season AS210 - EU Wet Grip class B-C The summer tyres are also cheaper & have better fuel economy according to the EU labels. What would be the advantage of all season tyres in these scenarios? Or am I missing something really obvious regarding how the EU ratings work? Read more”
“Falken Euroall Season AS210 vs Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 My mum drives an old VW Golf and needs new tyres for her car. She regularly does motorway trips and wants four tyres that will last. Two tyres that are within her budget (£300) with fitting included are the Falken Euroall Season AS210 and the Hankook Kinergy Eco 2. I'm leaning toward the Hankook just because of the brand recognition but the Falken is an all season tyre whereas the Hankook is only a summer tyre. Does this matter? The Hankook also has better fuel economy and wet braking in when I look at the EU chart but is that cancelled out by the fact it is a summer tyre and not a winter one? How much should I give to the EU rating?”
Based on 9 community posts
Yokohama Geolandar G98A
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 | B · Yokohama Geolandar G98A |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Premium Touring tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Falken
Yokohama
Winner: Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 — better treadwear, comfort and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 scores 86 vs 49 on treadwear.
Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 scores 81 vs 61 on comfort.
Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 scores 84 vs 67 on wet.
Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 scores 81 vs 68 on handling.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.