57
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
56/100
13 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Bridgestone Ecopia EP25 vs Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
71
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
70/100
21 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 — better treadwear, wet and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Ecowing ES01 KH27 leads by 11
Why this score
| Source | Ecopia EP25 | Ecowing ES01 KH27 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 65 | 76 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Ecowing ES01 KH27 leads by 16
Why this score
| Source | Ecopia EP25 | Ecowing ES01 KH27 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 46 | 62 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Ecowing ES01 KH27 leads by 16
Why this score
| Source | Ecopia EP25 | Ecowing ES01 KH27 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 64 | 80 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Ecowing ES01 KH27 leads by 19
Why this score
| Source | Ecopia EP25 | Ecowing ES01 KH27 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 58 | 77 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Ecopia EP25 leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | Ecopia EP25 | Ecowing ES01 KH27 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 62 | 61 |
| DriverReviews owners | – | 82 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Ecopia EP25 | Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 57 | 71 |
| Dry | 65 | 76 |
| Wet | 46 | 62 |
| Comfort | 64 | 80 |
| Treadwear | 58 | 77 |
| Handling | 62 | 61 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
57
/ 100
Tire A
71
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Ecopia EP25 is generally viewed as a polarizing OEM-focused tire that performs adequately in dry, city-based conditions but receives significant criticism for its wet-weather safety. While some users appreciate its fuel efficiency and longevity in light-duty applications, a substantial portion of the user base reports alarming hydroplaning and a sharp decline in performance as the tread wears down.
Pros
- Reliable dry road handling and braking performance
- Good fuel economy and low rolling resistance
- Comfortable ride quality on highway surfaces
- Consistent performance when new
Cons
- Poor wet-weather traction and high risk of hydroplaning
- Significant loss of grip as tread depth decreases
- Increased road noise at higher speeds
- Premature tread wear in some driving conditions
Observations
- Users of compact city cars like the Toyota Yaris and IQ2 report mixed experiences, with some finding them suitable for urban commuting while others cite excessive noise and poor grip.
- Drivers of small hatchbacks noted that the tire's performance characteristics, particularly in the wet, become noticeably more unstable once the tread depth drops below 4mm.
The Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 presents a highly polarized user experience, often described as either an excellent value-oriented eco-tire or a dangerous liability. While many owners praise its fuel efficiency, low noise levels, and comfort for daily commuting, a significant segment of users reports severe concerns regarding wet-weather traction and unpredictable handling during cornering.
Pros
- High fuel efficiency and rolling resistance improvements
- Low road noise and quiet operation
- Good ride comfort and bump absorption
- Strong value for money for casual, non-aggressive driving
Cons
- Unpredictable and poor wet-weather grip
- Tendency to slip or lose traction on roundabouts and corners
- Soft sidewalls leading to a 'jelly' or unstable handling feel
- High-pitched screeching noise when pushed in dry conditions
Observations
- Users driving smaller hatchbacks like the Honda Jazz or VW Up report significant confidence issues with rear-end stability on roundabouts.
- Drivers on rougher road surfaces, such as those in Kenya, noted that while tread life is impressive, the sidewalls are susceptible to damage from potholes.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Ecopia EP25 | B · Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
57
/ 100
Bridgestone
71
/ 100
Kumho
Winner: Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 — better treadwear, wet and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 scores 77 vs 58 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 scores 62 vs 46 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 scores 80 vs 64 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 scores 76 vs 65 on dry.
Tire A · Bridgestone Ecopia EP25
Tire B · Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27
More comparisons
Also compared with
Bridgestone Ecopia EP25 also compared with
Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.