Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 vs Kumho Ecsta PS31 — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Kumho

Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27

Summer Premium Touring tires

Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
70/100
21 owner reviews
Dry
76
Wet
62
Snow
–
Comfort
80
Noise
–
Treadwear
77
Handling
61

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Kumho

Kumho Ecsta PS31

Summer Ultra High Performance tires

Kumho Ecsta PS31 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
77/100
258 owner reviews
Dry
86
Wet
81
Snow
79
Comfort
83
Noise
89
Treadwear
81
Handling
79

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Kumho Ecsta PS31 — better wet, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Ecsta PS31 leads by 10
A — Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27
76
B — Kumho Ecsta PS31
86
Why this score
SourceEcowing ES01 KH27Ecsta PS31
Tire Rack owners – 85
Tyre Reviews owners 76 83
SimpleTire owners – 93

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Ecsta PS31 leads by 19
A — Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27
62
B — Kumho Ecsta PS31
81
Why this score
SourceEcowing ES01 KH27Ecsta PS31
Tire Rack owners – 81
Tyre Reviews owners 62 78
SimpleTire owners – 87

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27
–
B — Kumho Ecsta PS31
79
Why this score
SourceEcowing ES01 KH27Ecsta PS31
SimpleTire owners – 79

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Ecsta PS31 leads by 3
A — Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27
80
B — Kumho Ecsta PS31
83
Why this score
SourceEcowing ES01 KH27Ecsta PS31
Tire Rack owners – 84
Tyre Reviews owners 80 78
SimpleTire owners – 89

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27
–
B — Kumho Ecsta PS31
89
Why this score
SourceEcowing ES01 KH27Ecsta PS31
SimpleTire owners – 89

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Ecsta PS31 leads by 4
A — Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27
77
B — Kumho Ecsta PS31
81
Why this score
SourceEcowing ES01 KH27Ecsta PS31
Tire Rack owners – 82
Tyre Reviews owners 77 75
SimpleTire owners – 88

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Ecsta PS31 leads by 18
A — Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27
61
B — Kumho Ecsta PS31
79
Why this score
SourceEcowing ES01 KH27Ecsta PS31
Tyre Reviews owners 61 79
DriverReviews owners 82 –

Scores at a glance

Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 vs Kumho Ecsta PS31: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryKumho Ecowing ES01 KH27Kumho Ecsta PS31
Relative Score 71 82
Dry 76 86
Wet 62 81
Snow – 79
Comfort 80 83
Noise – 89
Treadwear 77 81
Handling 61 79

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27

The Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 presents a highly polarized user experience, often described as either an excellent value-oriented eco-tire or a dangerous liability. While many owners praise its fuel efficiency, low noise levels, and comfort for daily commuting, a significant segment of users reports severe concerns regarding wet-weather traction and unpredictable handling during cornering.

Pros

  • High fuel efficiency and rolling resistance improvements
  • Low road noise and quiet operation
  • Good ride comfort and bump absorption
  • Strong value for money for casual, non-aggressive driving

Cons

  • Unpredictable and poor wet-weather grip
  • Tendency to slip or lose traction on roundabouts and corners
  • Soft sidewalls leading to a 'jelly' or unstable handling feel
  • High-pitched screeching noise when pushed in dry conditions

Observations

  • Users driving smaller hatchbacks like the Honda Jazz or VW Up report significant confidence issues with rear-end stability on roundabouts.
  • Drivers on rougher road surfaces, such as those in Kenya, noted that while tread life is impressive, the sidewalls are susceptible to damage from potholes.
Tire B Kumho Ecsta PS31

The Kumho Ecsta PS31 is widely regarded as a high-value, budget-friendly performance tire that excels in daily driving comfort and quietness. While it offers impressive dry grip and reliable wet weather performance for most drivers, enthusiasts often note that its soft sidewalls result in less steering precision and reduced feedback during aggressive cornering compared to premium ultra-high-performance alternatives.

Pros

  • Excellent price-to-performance ratio
  • High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
  • Strong dry traction for daily and spirited street driving
  • Predictable and capable wet weather performance for most conditions

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls lead to vague steering response and 'squirm' during aggressive maneuvers
  • Inconsistent wet weather performance reported by some users, particularly in deep standing water
  • Tread life can be shorter than expected for some driving styles
  • Increased noise levels as the tire wears down

Observations

  • Users with smaller, lighter vehicles (e.g., Mazda Miata, Honda Civic) often praise the comfort and value, while those with heavier or more powerful vehicles report more pronounced sidewall flex and handling vagueness.
  • Drivers running low-profile sizes on rough roads report a higher susceptibility to sidewall bubbles and damage from potholes, suggesting a need for road hazard coverage.
  • The tire is frequently noted as a significant upgrade in comfort and noise reduction when replacing OEM run-flat tires.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 B · Kumho Ecsta PS31
CategorySummer Premium Touring tiresSummer Ultra High Performance tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—4
Rim diameters—17″ – 18″
Tread depth—10/32″
UTQG—460 A A
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—51 psi
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho

Kumho

Winner: Kumho Ecsta PS31 — better wet, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho Ecsta PS31 scores 81 vs 62 on wet.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Kumho Ecsta PS31 scores 79 vs 61 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Kumho Ecsta PS31 scores 86 vs 76 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Kumho Ecsta PS31 scores 81 vs 77 on treadwear.

Tire A · Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27
Tire B · Kumho Ecsta PS31

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.