80
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
79/100
17 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 vs Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
71
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
70/100
21 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 — better handling, wet and dry. Pick the Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 if comfort matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Ecopia EP300 leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | Ecopia EP300 | Ecowing ES01 KH27 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 76 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Ecopia EP300 leads by 14
Why this score
| Source | Ecopia EP300 | Ecowing ES01 KH27 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 76 | 62 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Ecowing ES01 KH27 leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | Ecopia EP300 | Ecowing ES01 KH27 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 77 | 80 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Ecopia EP300 leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | Ecopia EP300 | Ecowing ES01 KH27 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 84 | 77 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Ecopia EP300 leads by 18
Why this score
| Source | Ecopia EP300 | Ecowing ES01 KH27 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 79 | 61 |
| DriverReviews owners | – | 82 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 | Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 80 | 71 |
| Dry | 83 | 76 |
| Wet | 76 | 62 |
| Comfort | 77 | 80 |
| Treadwear | 84 | 77 |
| Handling | 79 | 61 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
80
/ 100
Tire A
71
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 is widely regarded as a durable, comfort-oriented tire that excels in longevity and fuel efficiency. While users consistently praise its smooth ride and high mileage capabilities, performance in wet conditions and steering feedback are noted as adequate but not class-leading.
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and durability
- High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
- Noticeable improvements in fuel economy
- Reliable dry weather handling and braking
Cons
- Wet weather grip can diminish significantly as the tire wears
- Soft sidewalls can result in a 'floaty' or bouncy driving feel
- Not intended for performance-oriented driving or aggressive cornering
- Some users report noise levels that increase over time
Observations
- Lightweight vehicles like the Proton Satria report excellent fuel economy and satisfaction with the tire's price-to-performance ratio.
- Drivers of family sedans note a 'floaty' sensation, likely attributed to the tire's soft sidewall construction designed for rolling resistance efficiency.
The Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 presents a highly polarized user experience, often described as either an excellent value-oriented eco-tire or a dangerous liability. While many owners praise its fuel efficiency, low noise levels, and comfort for daily commuting, a significant segment of users reports severe concerns regarding wet-weather traction and unpredictable handling during cornering.
Pros
- High fuel efficiency and rolling resistance improvements
- Low road noise and quiet operation
- Good ride comfort and bump absorption
- Strong value for money for casual, non-aggressive driving
Cons
- Unpredictable and poor wet-weather grip
- Tendency to slip or lose traction on roundabouts and corners
- Soft sidewalls leading to a 'jelly' or unstable handling feel
- High-pitched screeching noise when pushed in dry conditions
Observations
- Users driving smaller hatchbacks like the Honda Jazz or VW Up report significant confidence issues with rear-end stability on roundabouts.
- Drivers on rougher road surfaces, such as those in Kenya, noted that while tread life is impressive, the sidewalls are susceptible to damage from potholes.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 | B · Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
80
/ 100
Bridgestone
71
/ 100
Kumho
Winner: Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 — better handling, wet and dry. Pick the Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 if comfort matters most to you.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 scores 79 vs 61 on handling.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 scores 76 vs 62 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 scores 83 vs 76 on dry.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 scores 84 vs 77 on treadwear.
Tire A · Bridgestone Ecopia EP300
Tire B · Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27
More comparisons
Also compared with
Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 also compared with
Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.