82
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
83/100
152 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 vs Kumho Ecsta PS31 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
82
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
77/100
258 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictToo close to call: Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 and Kumho Ecsta PS31 are within 2 points overall. Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 is stronger on dry, wet and noise. Kumho Ecsta PS31 is stronger on snow and treadwear.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Ventus V12 evo2 leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | Ventus V12 evo2 | Ecsta PS31 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 87 | 85 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 87 | 83 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 93 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Ventus V12 evo2 leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | Ventus V12 evo2 | Ecsta PS31 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 81 | 81 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 81 | 78 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 87 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Ecsta PS31 leads by 12
Why this score
| Source | Ventus V12 evo2 | Ecsta PS31 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleTire owners | – | 79 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Ventus V12 evo2 leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | Ventus V12 evo2 | Ecsta PS31 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 82 | 84 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 77 | 78 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 89 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Ventus V12 evo2 leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | Ventus V12 evo2 | Ecsta PS31 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleTire owners | – | 89 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Ecsta PS31 leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | Ventus V12 evo2 | Ecsta PS31 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 72 | 82 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 73 | 75 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 88 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Ventus V12 evo2 | Ecsta PS31 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 79 | 79 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 | Kumho Ecsta PS31 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 82 | 82 |
| Dry | 91 | 86 |
| Wet | 85 | 81 |
| Snow | 67 | 79 |
| Comfort | 84 | 83 |
| Noise | 92 | 89 |
| Treadwear | 78 | 81 |
| Handling | 79 | 79 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
82
/ 100
Tire A
82
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 is widely regarded as a high-value, performance-oriented summer tire that offers a compelling balance of dry grip, wet weather confidence, and comfort at a competitive price point. While it excels in daily driving and spirited road use, some enthusiasts note limitations in steering precision and sidewall stiffness when pushed to the absolute limit on track or in aggressive cornering.
Pros
- Excellent value-for-money proposition compared to premium tier brands.
- Strong traction and handling in both dry and wet road conditions.
- Low road noise levels and high comfort for a performance tire.
- Predictable and progressive breakaway characteristics at the limit.
Cons
- Soft sidewalls can lead to a 'floaty' feel or lack of steering feedback during aggressive maneuvers.
- Tread life is generally considered average to short, particularly for spirited drivers.
- Performance can degrade noticeably as the tire wears down, specifically regarding noise and wet grip.
- Not suitable for cold weather or near-freezing temperatures.
Observations
- Users with high-torque, rear-wheel-drive vehicles (e.g., Mustang GT, C5/C6 Corvette) report excellent straight-line hook but note that aggressive driving significantly accelerates rear tread wear.
- Drivers of European sedans (BMW, Audi) appreciate the comfort and noise reduction compared to OEM run-flat tires, though some note the soft sidewall is less ideal for track-focused setups.
- Some users on 17-inch or smaller wheels report a firmer ride than expected, while those on larger diameters generally praise the balance of comfort and performance.
The Kumho Ecsta PS31 is widely regarded as a high-value, budget-friendly performance tire that excels in daily driving comfort and quietness. While it offers impressive dry grip and reliable wet weather performance for most drivers, enthusiasts often note that its soft sidewalls result in less steering precision and reduced feedback during aggressive cornering compared to premium ultra-high-performance alternatives.
Pros
- Excellent price-to-performance ratio
- High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
- Strong dry traction for daily and spirited street driving
- Predictable and capable wet weather performance for most conditions
Cons
- Soft sidewalls lead to vague steering response and 'squirm' during aggressive maneuvers
- Inconsistent wet weather performance reported by some users, particularly in deep standing water
- Tread life can be shorter than expected for some driving styles
- Increased noise levels as the tire wears down
Observations
- Users with smaller, lighter vehicles (e.g., Mazda Miata, Honda Civic) often praise the comfort and value, while those with heavier or more powerful vehicles report more pronounced sidewall flex and handling vagueness.
- Drivers running low-profile sizes on rough roads report a higher susceptibility to sidewall bubbles and damage from potholes, suggesting a need for road hazard coverage.
- The tire is frequently noted as a significant upgrade in comfort and noise reduction when replacing OEM run-flat tires.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 | B · Kumho Ecsta PS31 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Ultra High Performance tires | Summer Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 4 |
| Rim diameters | — | 17″ – 18″ |
| Tread depth | — | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 460 A A |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
82
/ 100
Hankook
82
/ 100
Kumho
Too close to call: Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 and Kumho Ecsta PS31 are within 2 points overall. Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 is stronger on dry, wet and noise. Kumho Ecsta PS31 is stronger on snow and treadwear.
Pick tire B
You drive through snowy winters
Kumho Ecsta PS31 scores 79 vs 67 on snow.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 scores 91 vs 86 on dry.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 scores 85 vs 81 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want a quieter cabin
Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 scores 92 vs 89 on noise.
Tire A · Hankook Ventus V12 evo2
Tire B · Kumho Ecsta PS31
More comparisons
Also compared with
Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 also compared with
Kumho Ecsta PS31 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.