89
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
90/100
43 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Continental ExtremeContact Sport vs Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
82
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
83/100
152 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Continental ExtremeContact Sport — better snow, treadwear and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
ExtremeContact Sport leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | ExtremeContact Sport | Ventus V12 evo2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 92 | 87 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 92 | 87 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
ExtremeContact Sport leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | ExtremeContact Sport | Ventus V12 evo2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 87 | 81 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 81 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
ExtremeContact Sport leads by 20
Comfort
Score (0–100)
ExtremeContact Sport leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | ExtremeContact Sport | Ventus V12 evo2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 87 | 82 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 86 | 77 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Ventus V12 evo2 leads by 1
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
ExtremeContact Sport leads by 9
Why this score
| Source | ExtremeContact Sport | Ventus V12 evo2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 80 | 72 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 73 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
ExtremeContact Sport leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | ExtremeContact Sport | Ventus V12 evo2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 79 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ExtremeContact Sport | Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 89 | 82 |
| Dry | 95 | 91 |
| Wet | 90 | 85 |
| Snow | 87 | 67 |
| Comfort | 91 | 84 |
| Noise | 91 | 92 |
| Treadwear | 87 | 78 |
| Handling | 80 | 79 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
89
/ 100
Tire A
82
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Continental ExtremeContact Sport is widely regarded as a premier ultra-high-performance summer tire that excels in balancing daily driving comfort with aggressive handling capabilities. Users consistently praise its superior wet and dry grip, low noise levels, and excellent value compared to more expensive competitors, though some enthusiasts note a softer sidewall that can slightly compromise steering precision.
Pros
- Exceptional wet and dry traction
- High level of ride comfort and low road noise
- Excellent value-to-performance ratio
- Strong performance even as tread wears down
Cons
- Softer sidewall can lead to a slight delay in steering response
- Tendency to become 'greasy' or lose performance during sustained high-heat track sessions
- Poor performance in cold temperatures (below 50°F)
- Potential for flat-spotting if left stationary in cold weather
Observations
- Owners of lightweight sports cars like the Mazda MX-5 report excellent synergy with the tire's handling characteristics, though some BRZ owners found the sidewall too soft for their specific suspension geometry.
- Drivers transitioning from factory run-flat tires on vehicles like the BMW Z4 noted a transformative improvement in ride quality and stability.
- EV owners noted that the tire handles the high torque and weight of electric vehicles well, though they remain mindful of accelerated tread wear under enthusiastic driving.
The Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 is widely regarded as a high-value, performance-oriented summer tire that offers a compelling balance of dry grip, wet weather confidence, and comfort at a competitive price point. While it excels in daily driving and spirited road use, some enthusiasts note limitations in steering precision and sidewall stiffness when pushed to the absolute limit on track or in aggressive cornering.
Pros
- Excellent value-for-money proposition compared to premium tier brands.
- Strong traction and handling in both dry and wet road conditions.
- Low road noise levels and high comfort for a performance tire.
- Predictable and progressive breakaway characteristics at the limit.
Cons
- Soft sidewalls can lead to a 'floaty' feel or lack of steering feedback during aggressive maneuvers.
- Tread life is generally considered average to short, particularly for spirited drivers.
- Performance can degrade noticeably as the tire wears down, specifically regarding noise and wet grip.
- Not suitable for cold weather or near-freezing temperatures.
Observations
- Users with high-torque, rear-wheel-drive vehicles (e.g., Mustang GT, C5/C6 Corvette) report excellent straight-line hook but note that aggressive driving significantly accelerates rear tread wear.
- Drivers of European sedans (BMW, Audi) appreciate the comfort and noise reduction compared to OEM run-flat tires, though some note the soft sidewall is less ideal for track-focused setups.
- Some users on 17-inch or smaller wheels report a firmer ride than expected, while those on larger diameters generally praise the balance of comfort and performance.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ExtremeContact Sport | B · Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Max Performance tires | Summer Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 340 AA A | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 30,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 - 51 psi | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
89
/ 100
Continental
82
/ 100
Hankook
Winner: Continental ExtremeContact Sport — better snow, treadwear and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You drive through snowy winters
Continental ExtremeContact Sport scores 87 vs 67 on snow.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Continental ExtremeContact Sport scores 87 vs 78 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Continental ExtremeContact Sport scores 91 vs 84 on comfort.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Continental ExtremeContact Sport scores 90 vs 85 on wet.
Tire A · Continental ExtremeContact Sport
Tire B · Hankook Ventus V12 evo2
More comparisons
Also compared with
Continental ExtremeContact Sport also compared with
Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.