Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Kumho Ecsta PS31 vs Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Kumho

Kumho Ecsta PS31

Summer Ultra High Performance tires

Kumho Ecsta PS31 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
77/100
258 owner reviews
Dry
86
Wet
81
Snow
79
Comfort
83
Noise
89
Treadwear
81
Handling
79

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Yokohama

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701

Summer Ultra High Performance tires

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
66/100
2 professional tests
User signal (40%)
82/100
253 owner reviews
Dry
89
Wet
75
Snow
36
Comfort
34
Noise
52
Treadwear
78
Handling
81

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Kumho Ecsta PS31 — better comfort, snow and noise. Pick the Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 if dry matters most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) ADVAN Fleva V701 leads by 3
A — Kumho Ecsta PS31
86
B — Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
89
Why this score
SourceEcsta PS31ADVAN Fleva V701
Professional tests (TWG score) 90
Tire Rack owners 85 90
Tyre Reviews owners 83 85
SimpleTire owners 93 88

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Ecsta PS31 leads by 6
A — Kumho Ecsta PS31
81
B — Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
75
Why this score
SourceEcsta PS31ADVAN Fleva V701
Professional tests (TWG score) 71
Tire Rack owners 81 80
Tyre Reviews owners 78 78
SimpleTire owners 87 79

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Ecsta PS31 leads by 43
A — Kumho Ecsta PS31
79
B — Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
36
Why this score
SourceEcsta PS31ADVAN Fleva V701
SimpleTire owners 79 47

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Ecsta PS31 leads by 49
A — Kumho Ecsta PS31
83
B — Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
34
Why this score
SourceEcsta PS31ADVAN Fleva V701
Professional tests (TWG score) 2
Tire Rack owners 84 84
Tyre Reviews owners 78 75
SimpleTire owners 89 84

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Ecsta PS31 leads by 37
A — Kumho Ecsta PS31
89
B — Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
52
Why this score
SourceEcsta PS31ADVAN Fleva V701
Professional tests (TWG score) 34
SimpleTire owners 89 83

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Ecsta PS31 leads by 3
A — Kumho Ecsta PS31
81
B — Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
78
Why this score
SourceEcsta PS31ADVAN Fleva V701
Tire Rack owners 82 79
Tyre Reviews owners 75 77
SimpleTire owners 88 79

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) ADVAN Fleva V701 leads by 2
A — Kumho Ecsta PS31
79
B — Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
81
Why this score
SourceEcsta PS31ADVAN Fleva V701
Tyre Reviews owners 79 81
DriverReviews owners 86

Scores at a glance

Kumho Ecsta PS31 vs Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryKumho Ecsta PS31Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Relative Score 82 66
Dry 86 89
Wet 81 75
Snow 79 36
Comfort 83 34
Noise 89 52
Treadwear 81 78
Handling 79 81

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Kumho Ecsta PS31

The Kumho Ecsta PS31 is widely regarded as a high-value, budget-friendly performance tire that excels in daily driving comfort and quietness. While it offers impressive dry grip and reliable wet weather performance for most drivers, enthusiasts often note that its soft sidewalls result in less steering precision and reduced feedback during aggressive cornering compared to premium ultra-high-performance alternatives.

Pros

  • Excellent price-to-performance ratio
  • High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
  • Strong dry traction for daily and spirited street driving
  • Predictable and capable wet weather performance for most conditions

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls lead to vague steering response and 'squirm' during aggressive maneuvers
  • Inconsistent wet weather performance reported by some users, particularly in deep standing water
  • Tread life can be shorter than expected for some driving styles
  • Increased noise levels as the tire wears down

Observations

  • Users with smaller, lighter vehicles (e.g., Mazda Miata, Honda Civic) often praise the comfort and value, while those with heavier or more powerful vehicles report more pronounced sidewall flex and handling vagueness.
  • Drivers running low-profile sizes on rough roads report a higher susceptibility to sidewall bubbles and damage from potholes, suggesting a need for road hazard coverage.
  • The tire is frequently noted as a significant upgrade in comfort and noise reduction when replacing OEM run-flat tires.
Tire B Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701

The Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 is widely regarded as a high-value, street-oriented summer performance tire that excels in dry grip and steering responsiveness. While it is a favorite among owners of lightweight sports cars like the Mazda MX-5 and Toyota MR2, users note that its softer sidewall construction prioritizes ride comfort over the razor-sharp precision required for dedicated track use.

Pros

  • Excellent dry weather traction and predictable handling near the limit.
  • Strong value proposition, offering performance comparable to premium tires at a lower price point.
  • Surprisingly quiet and comfortable ride quality for a performance-oriented tire.
  • Good availability in niche, smaller rim sizes (e.g., 15-inch) that are often neglected by other manufacturers.
  • Reliable wet weather performance for daily driving conditions.

Cons

  • Softer sidewalls can lead to a 'bouncy' or less precise feel during aggressive cornering.
  • Inconsistent tread life reports, with some users experiencing rapid wear under spirited driving or improper alignment.
  • Not suitable for track-day abuse, as the compound can overheat and lose grip during extended high-intensity sessions.
  • Some reports of increased road noise on specific asphalt surfaces or after the tire has aged.
  • Occasional quality control issues, such as tires being 'out of round' or difficult to balance.

Observations

  • Owners of lightweight sports cars (Miata, MR2, Honda CRX) frequently praise the tire for balancing daily comfort with enough grip for spirited back-road driving.
  • Users with heavier or more powerful vehicles occasionally report that the tire's sidewall flex is noticeable, leading to a less 'planted' feel compared to stiffer UHP alternatives.
  • Drivers running 15-inch and 16-inch sizes appreciate the tire as one of the few remaining high-performance options for their vehicles.
Community buzz

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Kumho Ecsta PS31

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701

Positive

Community opinion on the Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 is generally very positive, with users frequently considering them as affordable, high-performing summer tires ideal for daily driving, spirited backroad runs, and wet conditions. Many drivers compare them favorably or as cost-effective alternatives to premium options like Michelin Pilot Sports, though questions occasionally arise regarding their exact lifespan and wear compared to all-season alternatives.

r/Civic_Type_R ·3 upvotes ·2026-09-05

“Suggestiona on tyres Hi everyone, Just wanted to ask if you guys ever had Yokohama Advan Fleva V701. My FK2 has nearly 400bhp and I’m not using it daily anymore as I want it to preserve the baby. My drive is a bit aggressive occasionally but nothing crazy or track day as I don’t have the time. I would like to know if you guys ever had this specific type of tyre. What you think about? They’re actually good? I wouldn’t like to buy again the Michelin pilot sport 4s which I found absolutely rubbish. I found those yoko for the decent price of 98£ each. So I buy it or should I move to Pirelli PZero pZ4 sport ?”

r/TyreReviews ·2 upvotes ·2026-06-06

“Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 in 2026 Do they make sense today? I’d put them on a hatchback (1300kg) and I usually drive up to 180-200 km/h with quick accelerations and curves in my daily. Weather is usually sunny, but sometimes it rains. Are them still a safe and a good choice, or are there some other brands that should result better for my driving style (and for my 215/45 r18 rims)? Thanks in advance.”

r/mr2 ·2 upvotes ·2025-05-24

“Yokohama advan fleva v701? Currently looking at stock sizes for my 99 MRS and the v701s are the only decent set I can find. I live in Canada and I was planning on ordering them for next week, and just thought to do one more validation check before driving out to Bellingham. Pretty new to picking out my own tires, trying to also stay within 550-600usd or maxish 800-850cad including tax if possible.”

Top themes
#Daily driving comfort#Spirited backroad performance#Wet and dry grip#Value and pricing#Lifespan and tread wear#Comparison with Michelin

Based on 20 community posts

Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Ecsta PS31 B · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
CategorySummer Ultra High Performance tiresSummer Ultra High Performance tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available437
Rim diameters17″ – 18″15″ – 20″
Tread depth10/32″9/32″
UTQG460 A A300 A A
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure51 psi51 psi
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho

Yokohama

Winner: Kumho Ecsta PS31 — better comfort, snow and noise. Pick the Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 if dry matters most to you.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Kumho Ecsta PS31 scores 83 vs 34 on comfort.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Kumho Ecsta PS31 scores 79 vs 36 on snow.

Pick tire A You want a quieter cabin

Kumho Ecsta PS31 scores 89 vs 52 on noise.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho Ecsta PS31 scores 81 vs 75 on wet.

Tire A · Kumho Ecsta PS31
Tire B · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.