Skip to content
Summer tire Summer Ultra High Performance tires Updated September 2026

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 review

The Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 is widely regarded as a high-value, street-oriented summer performance tire that excels in dry grip and steering responsiveness. While it is a favorite among owners of lightweight sports cars like the Mazda MX-5 and Toyota MR2, users note that its softer sidewall construction prioritizes ride comfort over the razor-sharp precision required for dedicated track use.

Relative score
66/100
tests + owners
Owner reviews
82/100
253 reviews
Road tests
66/100
3 published tests
Community sentiment Positive Read the buzz
#Daily driving comfort#Spirited backroad performance#Wet and dry grip#Value and pricing#Lifespan and tread wear

Owners rate it 16 points higher than the instrumented road tests do — see the two score breakdowns below for where they disagree.

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Scores

Two scoring systems, side by side

Owner scores come from reviews on retailer and review sites; road-test scores come from instrumented tests. Where they disagree, it is usually a discipline owners rarely push to the limit.

By owner reviews

81.8%
Would buy again 78%
Dry
Overall dry
88.4%
Corner stability
84%
Dry traction
86%
Steering response
83%
Wet
Overall wet
79.2%
Wet traction
82%
Snow & ice
Overall snow & ice
36%
Comfort
Overall comfort
81.4%
Noise
Overall noise
80%
Treadwear
Overall treadwear
78.2%
Handling
Overall handling
81%
By source
DriverReviews92%1,919 reviews Tire Rack83%171 reviews Tyre Reviews79%69 reviews

By road tests

65.8%
Dry
89.6%
Wet
71.4%
Comfort
2%
Noise
34.1%
By discipline (% of best in test)
Dry Braking
82.8%
Dry Handling
35%
Wet Braking
36.1%
Wet Handling
25%
Straight Aquaplaning
30%
Inside Noise level
95%
Subjective Comfort
30%
Rolling Resistance
70%
Price
20%
Wear
35%
From owners

What owners like and dislike

Themes extracted from 253 owner reviews across retailers and review sites.

The Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 is widely regarded as a high-value, street-oriented summer performance tire that excels in dry grip and steering responsiveness. While it is a favorite among owners of lightweight sports cars like the Mazda MX-5 and Toyota MR2, users note that its softer sidewall construction prioritizes ride comfort over the razor-sharp precision required for dedicated track use.

Pros

  • Excellent dry weather traction and predictable handling near the limit.
  • Strong value proposition, offering performance comparable to premium tires at a lower price point.
  • Surprisingly quiet and comfortable ride quality for a performance-oriented tire.
  • Good availability in niche, smaller rim sizes (e.g., 15-inch) that are often neglected by other manufacturers.
  • Reliable wet weather performance for daily driving conditions.

Cons

  • Softer sidewalls can lead to a 'bouncy' or less precise feel during aggressive cornering.
  • Inconsistent tread life reports, with some users experiencing rapid wear under spirited driving or improper alignment.
  • Not suitable for track-day abuse, as the compound can overheat and lose grip during extended high-intensity sessions.
  • Some reports of increased road noise on specific asphalt surfaces or after the tire has aged.
  • Occasional quality control issues, such as tires being 'out of round' or difficult to balance.

Worth knowing

  • Owners of lightweight sports cars (Miata, MR2, Honda CRX) frequently praise the tire for balancing daily comfort with enough grip for spirited back-road driving.
  • Users with heavier or more powerful vehicles occasionally report that the tire's sidewall flex is noticeable, leading to a less 'planted' feel compared to stiffer UHP alternatives.
  • Drivers running 15-inch and 16-inch sizes appreciate the tire as one of the few remaining high-performance options for their vehicles.
Test results

3 published test appearances

Placement within each field. Open a test for the discipline-by-discipline result.

2019 Auto Bild Summer tire Test · 225/45 R17

14th of 20
Best: Noise · 2nd Weakest: Wet Braking · 19th
DisciplinePlacementField position
Wet Braking19th of 20
Wet Handling16th of 20
Dry Braking6th of 20
Dry Handling14th of 20
Rolling Resistance7th of 20
Straight Aqua15th of 20
Subj. Comfort17th of 20
Noise2nd of 20
Value17th of 20
Price17th of 20
Wear14th of 20
Total Cost of Ownership14th of 20

2019 Summer 53 tire Braking Shootout · 225/45 R17

16th of 45
Best: Dry Braking · 8th Weakest: Wet Braking · 21st
DisciplinePlacementField position
Wet Braking21st of 45
Dry Braking8th of 45

2018 Auto Review 225/45 R17 tire Test · 225/45 R17

9th of 11
DisciplinePlacementField position
Where to buy

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 specs & sizes

Prices vary by size, so each one links out separately.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Community buzz

What owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of the scores above.

Community opinion on the Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 is generally very positive, with users frequently considering them as affordable, high-performing summer tires ideal for daily driving, spirited backroad runs, and wet conditions. Many drivers compare them favorably or as cost-effective alternatives to premium options like Michelin Pilot Sports, though questions occasionally arise regarding their exact lifespan and wear compared to all-season alternatives.

Sentiment breakdown
Positive15%
Mixed85%
Top themes
#Daily driving comfort#Spirited backroad performance#Wet and dry grip#Value and pricing#Lifespan and tread wear#Comparison with Michelin

From 20 threads and comments.

Head-to-head

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 compared

Compare any two