Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Michelin Pilot Sport 3 vs Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Michelin Pilot Sport 3 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
71/100
Owner ratings
Dry
93
Wet
86
Snow
–
Comfort
79
Noise
77
Treadwear
70
Handling
92

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Yokohama

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701

Summer Ultra High Performance tires

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
66/100
2 professional tests
User signal (40%)
82/100
253 owner reviews
Dry
89
Wet
75
Snow
36
Comfort
34
Noise
52
Treadwear
78
Handling
81

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Michelin Pilot Sport 3 — better comfort, noise and wet. Pick the Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 if treadwear matters most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Pilot Sport 3 leads by 4
A — Michelin Pilot Sport 3
93
B — Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
89
Why this score
SourcePilot Sport 3ADVAN Fleva V701
Professional tests (TWG score) – 90
Tire Rack owners 93 90
Tyre Reviews owners – 85
SimpleTire owners – 88

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Pilot Sport 3 leads by 11
A — Michelin Pilot Sport 3
86
B — Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
75
Why this score
SourcePilot Sport 3ADVAN Fleva V701
Professional tests (TWG score) – 71
Tire Rack owners 85 80
Tyre Reviews owners – 78
SimpleTire owners – 79

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Michelin Pilot Sport 3
–
B — Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
36
Why this score
SourcePilot Sport 3ADVAN Fleva V701
SimpleTire owners – 47

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Pilot Sport 3 leads by 45
A — Michelin Pilot Sport 3
79
B — Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
34
Why this score
SourcePilot Sport 3ADVAN Fleva V701
Professional tests (TWG score) – 2
Tire Rack owners 81 84
Tyre Reviews owners – 75
SimpleTire owners – 84

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Pilot Sport 3 leads by 25
A — Michelin Pilot Sport 3
77
B — Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
52
Why this score
SourcePilot Sport 3ADVAN Fleva V701
Professional tests (TWG score) – 34
SimpleTire owners – 83

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) ADVAN Fleva V701 leads by 8
A — Michelin Pilot Sport 3
70
B — Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
78
Why this score
SourcePilot Sport 3ADVAN Fleva V701
Tire Rack owners 73 79
Tyre Reviews owners – 77
SimpleTire owners – 79

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Pilot Sport 3 leads by 11
A — Michelin Pilot Sport 3
92
B — Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
81
Why this score
SourcePilot Sport 3ADVAN Fleva V701
Tyre Reviews owners – 81
DriverReviews owners – 86

Scores at a glance

Michelin Pilot Sport 3 vs Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryMichelin Pilot Sport 3Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Relative Score 82 70
Dry 93 89
Wet 86 75
Snow – 36
Comfort 79 34
Noise 77 52
Treadwear 70 78
Handling 92 81

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Michelin Pilot Sport 3

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701

The Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 is widely regarded as a high-value, street-oriented summer performance tire that excels in dry grip and steering responsiveness. While it is a favorite among owners of lightweight sports cars like the Mazda MX-5 and Toyota MR2, users note that its softer sidewall construction prioritizes ride comfort over the razor-sharp precision required for dedicated track use.

Pros

  • Excellent dry weather traction and predictable handling near the limit.
  • Strong value proposition, offering performance comparable to premium tires at a lower price point.
  • Surprisingly quiet and comfortable ride quality for a performance-oriented tire.
  • Good availability in niche, smaller rim sizes (e.g., 15-inch) that are often neglected by other manufacturers.
  • Reliable wet weather performance for daily driving conditions.

Cons

  • Softer sidewalls can lead to a 'bouncy' or less precise feel during aggressive cornering.
  • Inconsistent tread life reports, with some users experiencing rapid wear under spirited driving or improper alignment.
  • Not suitable for track-day abuse, as the compound can overheat and lose grip during extended high-intensity sessions.
  • Some reports of increased road noise on specific asphalt surfaces or after the tire has aged.
  • Occasional quality control issues, such as tires being 'out of round' or difficult to balance.

Observations

  • Owners of lightweight sports cars (Miata, MR2, Honda CRX) frequently praise the tire for balancing daily comfort with enough grip for spirited back-road driving.
  • Users with heavier or more powerful vehicles occasionally report that the tire's sidewall flex is noticeable, leading to a less 'planted' feel compared to stiffer UHP alternatives.
  • Drivers running 15-inch and 16-inch sizes appreciate the tire as one of the few remaining high-performance options for their vehicles.
Community buzz

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Michelin Pilot Sport 3

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701

Positive

Community opinion on the Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 is generally very positive, with users frequently considering them as affordable, high-performing summer tires ideal for daily driving, spirited backroad runs, and wet conditions. Many drivers compare them favorably or as cost-effective alternatives to premium options like Michelin Pilot Sports, though questions occasionally arise regarding their exact lifespan and wear compared to all-season alternatives.

r/Civic_Type_R ·3 upvotes ·2026-09-05

“Suggestiona on tyres Hi everyone, Just wanted to ask if you guys ever had Yokohama Advan Fleva V701. My FK2 has nearly 400bhp and I’m not using it daily anymore as I want it to preserve the baby. My drive is a bit aggressive occasionally but nothing crazy or track day as I don’t have the time. I would like to know if you guys ever had this specific type of tyre. What you think about? They’re actually good? I wouldn’t like to buy again the Michelin pilot sport 4s which I found absolutely rubbish. I found those yoko for the decent price of 98£ each. So I buy it or should I move to Pirelli PZero pZ4 sport ?”

r/TyreReviews ·2 upvotes ·2026-06-06

“Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 in 2026 Do they make sense today? I’d put them on a hatchback (1300kg) and I usually drive up to 180-200 km/h with quick accelerations and curves in my daily. Weather is usually sunny, but sometimes it rains. Are them still a safe and a good choice, or are there some other brands that should result better for my driving style (and for my 215/45 r18 rims)? Thanks in advance.”

r/mr2 ·2 upvotes ·2025-05-24

“Yokohama advan fleva v701? Currently looking at stock sizes for my 99 MRS and the v701s are the only decent set I can find. I live in Canada and I was planning on ordering them for next week, and just thought to do one more validation check before driving out to Bellingham. Pretty new to picking out my own tires, trying to also stay within 550-600usd or maxish 800-850cad including tax if possible.”

Top themes
#Daily driving comfort#Spirited backroad performance#Wet and dry grip#Value and pricing#Lifespan and tread wear#Comparison with Michelin

Based on 20 community posts

Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Michelin Pilot Sport 3 B · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Category—Summer Ultra High Performance tires
Vehicle type—Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—37
Rim diameters—15″ – 20″
Tread depth—9/32″
UTQG—300 A A
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—51 psi
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Michelin

Yokohama

Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport 3 — better comfort, noise and wet. Pick the Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 if treadwear matters most to you.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Michelin Pilot Sport 3 scores 79 vs 34 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want a quieter cabin

Michelin Pilot Sport 3 scores 77 vs 52 on noise.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin Pilot Sport 3 scores 86 vs 75 on wet.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin Pilot Sport 3 scores 92 vs 81 on handling.

Tire A · Michelin Pilot Sport 3
Tire B · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.