Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S vs Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | Pilot Sport 4 S | ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 87 | 90 |
| Tire Rack owners | 95 | 90 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 92 | 85 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 88 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) | 92% | 97% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) | 100% | 98% |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | Pilot Sport 4 S | ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 83 | 71 |
| Tire Rack owners | 88 | 80 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 87 | 78 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 79 |
| Wet Braking (% of best) | 95% | 87% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) | 100% | 95% |
Snow
Why this score
| Source | Pilot Sport 4 S | ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleTire owners | – | 47 |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | Pilot Sport 4 S | ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 82 | 2 |
| Tire Rack owners | 87 | 84 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 84 | 75 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 84 |
Noise
Why this score
| Source | Pilot Sport 4 S | ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 78 | 34 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 83 |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | Pilot Sport 4 S | ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 80 | 79 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 77 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 79 |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | Pilot Sport 4 S | ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 86 | 81 |
| DriverReviews owners | 92 | 86 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S | Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 89 | 70 |
| Dry | 91 | 89 |
| Wet | 87 | 75 |
| Snow | – | 36 |
| Comfort | 86 | 34 |
| Noise | 84 | 52 |
| Treadwear | 90 | 78 |
| Handling | 95 | 81 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Tire A | Tire B | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 92% #1/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test | 97% #8/45 · 2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout | -5.2 | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 100% #2/8 · 2026 Autobild Sports Cars Summer Tyre Test | 98% #14/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | +1.1 | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 94% #2/7 · Best Performance Tyres For 2025 | 82% #7/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | +11.8 | Different tests |
| Noise | Other | 100% #8/8 · 2018 Auto Bild 20 inch UHP Tyre Test | 95% #2/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | +4.8 | Different tests |
| Price | Other | 46% #11/11 · 2023 Sport Auto UHP Tyre Test | 79% #17/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | -32.8 | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 50% #2/7 · 2025 Autobild Sports Cars UUHP Tyre Test | 11% #9/11 · 2018 Auto Review 225/45 R17 Tyre Test | +38.9 | Different tests |
| Straight Aqua | Straight | 97% #3/7 · 2020 EVO UHP Summer Tyre Test | 92% #15/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | +4.3 | Different tests |
| Subj. Comfort | Subj | 100% #1/7 · Best Performance Tyres For 2025 | 56% #17/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | +44.4 | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 95% #3/9 · 2021 Auto Bild UUHP Summer Tyre Test | 87% #21/45 · 2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout | +7.7 | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 100% #1/8 · 2018 Auto Bild 20 inch UHP Tyre Test | 95% #16/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | +5.5 | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S is widely regarded as a benchmark ultra-high-performance summer tire, consistently praised for its exceptional wet and dry grip, confidence-inspiring handling, and superior ride comfort compared to OEM run-flat alternatives. While most users laud its versatility and safety, some enthusiasts note that its relatively soft sidewalls can result in slightly less steering precision or feedback compared to more track-focused or stiffer-walled competitors.
Pros
- Exceptional wet and dry traction
- High levels of ride comfort and reduced road noise
- Predictable handling and stability at high speeds
- Excellent rim protection design
- Strong longevity for a high-performance tire
Cons
- Soft sidewalls can feel vague or sluggish during aggressive steering inputs
- High price point compared to competitors
- Performance can degrade significantly as the tread wears down
- Reports of sidewall cracking or perishing in some climates
- Not suitable for cold weather or snow
Observations
- Users transitioning from OEM run-flat tires on luxury and performance vehicles (e.g., BMW, Mercedes, Tesla) report a transformative improvement in ride quality and noise reduction.
- Drivers of high-horsepower, rear-wheel-drive vehicles frequently highlight the tire's ability to put power down effectively, though some note faster wear on rear axles.
- Some users with heavy vehicles or specific performance setups noted that the tire's soft sidewall can lead to a 'bouncy' or less precise feel during rapid direction changes.
The Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 is widely regarded as a high-value, street-oriented summer performance tire that excels in dry grip and steering responsiveness. While it is a favorite among owners of lightweight sports cars like the Mazda MX-5 and Toyota MR2, users note that its softer sidewall construction prioritizes ride comfort over the razor-sharp precision required for dedicated track use.
Pros
- Excellent dry weather traction and predictable handling near the limit.
- Strong value proposition, offering performance comparable to premium tires at a lower price point.
- Surprisingly quiet and comfortable ride quality for a performance-oriented tire.
- Good availability in niche, smaller rim sizes (e.g., 15-inch) that are often neglected by other manufacturers.
- Reliable wet weather performance for daily driving conditions.
Cons
- Softer sidewalls can lead to a 'bouncy' or less precise feel during aggressive cornering.
- Inconsistent tread life reports, with some users experiencing rapid wear under spirited driving or improper alignment.
- Not suitable for track-day abuse, as the compound can overheat and lose grip during extended high-intensity sessions.
- Some reports of increased road noise on specific asphalt surfaces or after the tire has aged.
- Occasional quality control issues, such as tires being 'out of round' or difficult to balance.
Observations
- Owners of lightweight sports cars (Miata, MR2, Honda CRX) frequently praise the tire for balancing daily comfort with enough grip for spirited back-road driving.
- Users with heavier or more powerful vehicles occasionally report that the tire's sidewall flex is noticeable, leading to a less 'planted' feel compared to stiffer UHP alternatives.
- Drivers running 15-inch and 16-inch sizes appreciate the tire as one of the few remaining high-performance options for their vehicles.
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
The Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S is widely praised by the community as a premier max performance summer tire, offering exceptional dry and wet grip, precise steering feel, and refined road manners for daily driving and spirited street use. While some users note higher pricing and relatively quick wear on heavier vehicles or hot tracks, it remains a benchmark choice that many enthusiasts gladly return to despite alternatives like Continental or Kumho.
“Tire condition after 1st track day. PS4s on a GR86 First 2 pics are drivers front, rest pass front. This was at CMP, temps mid 70s, mostly cloudy. Lowered TP to 31psi. Highest I saw on track was 36 psi. The driver side l thought looked good, but passengers side inner looks like they melted. Is this track rubber I picked up or due to mostly turning right on this clockwise circuit?? Also was pleasantly surprised to only have used 1/16 of tread depth after 110 minutes on track. Given what I have read, thought the ps4s would be all used up. Maybe on a hot track surface they would have been eaten up. Read more”
“Am I the owner of the newer PS4s?😁 Hello everyone, new in the sub and just want to share my love for the Pilot Sport 4s. This is the third set and I love it. To me they are the perfect compromise beetween performance anche tyre wear. Last set last me 43k km, I do lot of highway and some spirited drive when possibile. I also had a set of Sport Contact 7, awesome grip, to me better than the PS4s, almost too much for my stock Golf. They also wear out faster. I saw yesterday the review of Potenza Sport Evo and they promise very week, maybe next time I’ll try!”
“I’ll say this. Going from the Pilot Super Sport to the Pilot Sport 4 S of the same size, I’m disappointed in the soft sidewall of the 4 S. This is an 8.5” wide wheel with 235/40/18 tires. The left-right fast slalom action got a bit mushy like the weight transfer was slowed down when I switched to the 4 S. I think a shorter sidewall 4 S would perform better in this way, or the same tire on a 9” wide wheel too. That said, the dry and wet grip is exceptional. To save money, I’d recommend the Continental ExtremeContact Sport.”
“Depending on the size they are absolutely overkill for street use on stock motor. I just installed a set of 245 ps4s on 17x9 rpf1s and its almost impossible to trigger the abs and traction co trol. The car is on absolute rails. That being said, if you have the money, there is not really any negatives from that. I intend to use mine on track days. Felt the cup 2s were overkill for 2 to 3 track days a year.”
Based on 104 community posts
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Community opinion on the Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 is generally very positive, with users frequently considering them as affordable, high-performing summer tires ideal for daily driving, spirited backroad runs, and wet conditions. Many drivers compare them favorably or as cost-effective alternatives to premium options like Michelin Pilot Sports, though questions occasionally arise regarding their exact lifespan and wear compared to all-season alternatives.
“Suggestiona on tyres Hi everyone, Just wanted to ask if you guys ever had Yokohama Advan Fleva V701. My FK2 has nearly 400bhp and I’m not using it daily anymore as I want it to preserve the baby. My drive is a bit aggressive occasionally but nothing crazy or track day as I don’t have the time. I would like to know if you guys ever had this specific type of tyre. What you think about? They’re actually good? I wouldn’t like to buy again the Michelin pilot sport 4s which I found absolutely rubbish. I found those yoko for the decent price of 98£ each. So I buy it or should I move to Pirelli PZero pZ4 sport ?”
“Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 in 2026 Do they make sense today? I’d put them on a hatchback (1300kg) and I usually drive up to 180-200 km/h with quick accelerations and curves in my daily. Weather is usually sunny, but sometimes it rains. Are them still a safe and a good choice, or are there some other brands that should result better for my driving style (and for my 215/45 r18 rims)? Thanks in advance.”
“Yokohama advan fleva v701? Currently looking at stock sizes for my 99 MRS and the v701s are the only decent set I can find. I live in Canada and I was planning on ordering them for next week, and just thought to do one more validation check before driving out to Bellingham. Pretty new to picking out my own tires, trying to also stay within 550-600usd or maxish 800-850cad including tax if possible.”
Based on 20 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S | B · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Max Performance tires | Summer Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 37 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | — | 9/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 300 A A |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Michelin
Yokohama
Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S — better comfort, noise and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S scores 86 vs 34 on comfort.
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S scores 84 vs 52 on noise.
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S scores 95 vs 81 on handling.
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S scores 87 vs 75 on wet.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.