89
/ 100
Objective (60%)
92/100
17 professional tests
User signal (40%)
92/100
2,273 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
70
/ 100
Objective (60%)
66/100
2 professional tests
User signal (40%)
82/100
253 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 — better comfort, noise and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Pilot Sport 4 leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | Pilot Sport 4 | ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 89 | 90 |
| Tire Rack owners | 93 | 90 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 85 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 88 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) | 100% | 97% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) | 99% | 98% |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Pilot Sport 4 leads by 14
Why this score
| Source | Pilot Sport 4 | ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 87 | 71 |
| Tire Rack owners | 87 | 80 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 87 | 78 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 79 |
| Wet Braking (% of best) | 92% | 87% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) | 93% | 95% |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Pilot Sport 4 | ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleTire owners | – | 47 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Pilot Sport 4 leads by 53
Why this score
| Source | Pilot Sport 4 | ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 83 | 2 |
| Tire Rack owners | 83 | 84 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 78 | 75 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 84 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Pilot Sport 4 leads by 29
Why this score
| Source | Pilot Sport 4 | ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 74 | 34 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 83 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Pilot Sport 4 leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | Pilot Sport 4 | ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 67 | 79 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 74 | 77 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 79 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Pilot Sport 4 leads by 13
Why this score
| Source | Pilot Sport 4 | ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 84 | 81 |
| DriverReviews owners | 90 | 86 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Pilot Sport 4 | Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 89 | 70 |
| Dry | 92 | 89 |
| Wet | 89 | 75 |
| Snow | – | 36 |
| Comfort | 87 | 34 |
| Noise | 81 | 52 |
| Treadwear | 88 | 78 |
| Handling | 94 | 81 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
89
/ 100
Tire A
70
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Test data
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Tire A | Tire B | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 100% #1/9 · 2018 AZ Summer AND All Season Tyre Test | 97% #8/45 · 2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout | +2.8 | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 99% #5/11 · 2018 AMS Summer UHP Tyre Test | 98% #14/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | +0.5 | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 99% #2/9 · 2021 EVO Summer Tyre Test | 82% #7/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | +16.3 | Different tests |
| Noise | Other | 99% #5/11 · 2020 AMS 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 95% #2/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | +3.8 | Different tests |
| Price | Other | 87% #5/9 · 2018 AZ Summer AND All Season Tyre Test | 79% #17/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | +7.7 | Different tests |
| Value | Other | 77% #10/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 93% #17/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | -16.6 | Same test |
| Wear | Other | 94% #2/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 66% #14/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | +28.1 | Same test |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 20% #5/9 · 2021 EVO Summer Tyre Test | 7% #14/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | +12.9 | Different tests |
| Straight Aqua | Straight | 100% #1/11 · 2020 AMS 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 92% #15/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | +7.5 | Different tests |
| Subj. Comfort | Subj | 100% #1/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 56% #17/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | +44.4 | Same test |
| Total Cost of Ownership | Total | 0% #16/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 0% #14/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 0 | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 92% #3/9 · 2021 EVO Summer Tyre Test | 87% #21/45 · 2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout | +5.2 | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 93% #6/9 · 2021 EVO Summer Tyre Test | 95% #16/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | -1.7 | Different tests |
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Michelin Pilot Sport 4 is widely regarded as a premier high-performance summer tire, praised for its exceptional wet-weather traction and balanced daily-driving characteristics. While many users report a significant improvement in ride quality and noise levels compared to OEM run-flats or older performance tires, some enthusiasts note a softer sidewall that can feel less precise or 'darty' during aggressive cornering compared to dedicated track-focused rubber.
Pros
- Class-leading wet weather grip and hydroplaning resistance
- Excellent balance of comfort and road noise reduction for a performance tire
- Predictable and progressive handling characteristics
- Strong dry-weather traction and braking performance
- Significant upgrade over OEM run-flat tires in terms of ride quality
Cons
- Softer sidewalls can lead to a less 'sharp' or 'darty' steering feel
- Tread wear can be rapid, particularly with spirited driving or on high-torque vehicles
- Performance can drop off noticeably as tread depth decreases
- Higher price point compared to many competitors
- Some reports of increased road noise as the tire ages
Observations
- Tesla and EV owners frequently report a measurable decrease in range due to higher rolling resistance compared to OEM 'eco' tires.
- Users with heavy, high-torque vehicles (e.g., tuned sedans, performance wagons) often praise the tire's ability to put power down, though this comes at the cost of faster rear-tire wear.
- Drivers switching from run-flat tires on luxury vehicles (BMW, Audi, Mercedes) consistently report a transformative improvement in ride comfort and cabin noise.
The Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 is widely regarded as a high-value, street-oriented summer performance tire that excels in dry grip and steering responsiveness. While it is a favorite among owners of lightweight sports cars like the Mazda MX-5 and Toyota MR2, users note that its softer sidewall construction prioritizes ride comfort over the razor-sharp precision required for dedicated track use.
Pros
- Excellent dry weather traction and predictable handling near the limit.
- Strong value proposition, offering performance comparable to premium tires at a lower price point.
- Surprisingly quiet and comfortable ride quality for a performance-oriented tire.
- Good availability in niche, smaller rim sizes (e.g., 15-inch) that are often neglected by other manufacturers.
- Reliable wet weather performance for daily driving conditions.
Cons
- Softer sidewalls can lead to a 'bouncy' or less precise feel during aggressive cornering.
- Inconsistent tread life reports, with some users experiencing rapid wear under spirited driving or improper alignment.
- Not suitable for track-day abuse, as the compound can overheat and lose grip during extended high-intensity sessions.
- Some reports of increased road noise on specific asphalt surfaces or after the tire has aged.
- Occasional quality control issues, such as tires being 'out of round' or difficult to balance.
Observations
- Owners of lightweight sports cars (Miata, MR2, Honda CRX) frequently praise the tire for balancing daily comfort with enough grip for spirited back-road driving.
- Users with heavier or more powerful vehicles occasionally report that the tire's sidewall flex is noticeable, leading to a less 'planted' feel compared to stiffer UHP alternatives.
- Drivers running 15-inch and 16-inch sizes appreciate the tire as one of the few remaining high-performance options for their vehicles.
Community buzz
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Positive
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
The Michelin Pilot Sport 4 (and its variants) is widely praised by the community as a massive upgrade over stock run-flats and budget tires, offering exceptional dry and wet grip, precise steering feel, and improved ride comfort. While users frequently note trade-offs in tread life due to the softer rubber compound, and higher pricing, it remains a top-tier recommendation for spirited street driving and performance cars.
r/BMW
·26 upvotes ·2024-09-23
“Surprised by Michelin Pilot Sport 4 tires - 2024 M440i Hey, BMW community. A year ago, I was lucky enough to order a 2024 M440i GC Xdrive. Spent hours driving different BMW's, tweaking my order sheet before my allocation was filled. Got the adaptive suspension, with 19's on Pirelli run-flats. After a few months, my San Remo GC was delivered. GREAT car. Now with ~17k miles, it was time for a routine service. And, apparently, new rear tires. Decided to just replace them all at the dealer. Went with what they recommended; Michelin Pilot Sport 4 (Star marked). What an upgrade! Steering feel, precision, comfort AND quiet. Anyone on the fence about the Pilot Sport 4 - highly recommended. Read more”
r/BoltEV
·5 upvotes ·2026-04-29
“Michelin Pilot Sport 4 tires are noisy (a followup) I have been asked on this sub if the PS4 tires on my wife’s Bolt are noisy, and I wasn’t sure how to answer. Well, we made two 60-mile round trips this past weekend, mostly on highways with 55 and 70 mph speed limits, and I have to say that the tires are kind of noisy. Certainly not as quiet as EV-oriented tires are. The grip is fantastic, so we really like them. If you are sensitive to noise, though, these Max Performance class tires are probably not for you.”
r/ft86
·3 upvotes ·2022-01-09
“I just installed A/S PS4 from Michelin on my BRZ recently & man they are so nice. How quiet it is, is wow, night and day. They handle quite nice except when it's still cold (sub 40F) on highway, traction control triggers but it may bc I'm lowered and yet to do my alignment. I don't know compared to stock, I was on Falken prior. I am using different tire set-up then stock however. I have 245/35 at the front and 265/35 in rear. My only regret is not going up to 40 on the sidewall for more meat. This is on 18" wheels.”
r/tires
·2 upvotes ·2026-07-28
“Those are Pilot sport 4 (all season). If it had s after the 4 it would be the summer high performance version. I put the pilot sport 4 on wife's GTI autobahn 2016. Great handling tire, stiff side walls, not the smoothest ride but best overall.”
Top themes
#grip and handling performance#ride quality and comfort#tread wear and lifespan#wet weather capability#comparison to runflats#noise levels#temperature limits and cold weather
Based on 117 community posts
Tire B
Positive
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Community opinion on the Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 is generally very positive, with users frequently considering them as affordable, high-performing summer tires ideal for daily driving, spirited backroad runs, and wet conditions. Many drivers compare them favorably or as cost-effective alternatives to premium options like Michelin Pilot Sports, though questions occasionally arise regarding their exact lifespan and wear compared to all-season alternatives.
r/Civic_Type_R
·3 upvotes ·2026-09-05
“Suggestiona on tyres Hi everyone, Just wanted to ask if you guys ever had Yokohama Advan Fleva V701. My FK2 has nearly 400bhp and I’m not using it daily anymore as I want it to preserve the baby. My drive is a bit aggressive occasionally but nothing crazy or track day as I don’t have the time. I would like to know if you guys ever had this specific type of tyre. What you think about? They’re actually good? I wouldn’t like to buy again the Michelin pilot sport 4s which I found absolutely rubbish. I found those yoko for the decent price of 98£ each. So I buy it or should I move to Pirelli PZero pZ4 sport ?”
r/TyreReviews
·2 upvotes ·2026-06-06
“Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 in 2026 Do they make sense today? I’d put them on a hatchback (1300kg) and I usually drive up to 180-200 km/h with quick accelerations and curves in my daily. Weather is usually sunny, but sometimes it rains. Are them still a safe and a good choice, or are there some other brands that should result better for my driving style (and for my 215/45 r18 rims)? Thanks in advance.”
r/mr2
·2 upvotes ·2025-05-24
“Yokohama advan fleva v701? Currently looking at stock sizes for my 99 MRS and the v701s are the only decent set I can find. I live in Canada and I was planning on ordering them for next week, and just thought to do one more validation check before driving out to Bellingham. Pretty new to picking out my own tires, trying to also stay within 550-600usd or maxish 800-850cad including tax if possible.”
Top themes
#Daily driving comfort#Spirited backroad performance#Wet and dry grip#Value and pricing#Lifespan and tread wear#Comparison with Michelin
Based on 20 community posts
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Pilot Sport 4 | B · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Max Performance tires | Summer Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 37 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | — | 9/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 300 A A |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
89
/ 100
Michelin
70
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 — better comfort, noise and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 scores 87 vs 34 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You want a quieter cabin
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 scores 81 vs 52 on noise.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 scores 89 vs 75 on wet.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 scores 94 vs 81 on handling.
Tire A · Michelin Pilot Sport 4
Tire B · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
More comparisons
Also compared with
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 also compared with
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.