Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Michelin Pilot Sport 5 vs Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | Pilot Sport 5 | ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 88 | 90 |
| Tire Rack owners | – | 90 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 85 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 88 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) | 97% | 97% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) | 99% | 98% |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | Pilot Sport 5 | ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 87 | 71 |
| Tire Rack owners | – | 80 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 91 | 78 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 79 |
| Wet Braking (% of best) | 95% | 87% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) | 88% | 95% |
Snow
Why this score
| Source | Pilot Sport 5 | ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleTire owners | – | 47 |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | Pilot Sport 5 | ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 77 | 2 |
| Tire Rack owners | – | 84 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 84 | 75 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 84 |
Noise
Why this score
| Source | Pilot Sport 5 | ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 82 | 34 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 83 |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | Pilot Sport 5 | ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 79 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 81 | 77 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 79 |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | Pilot Sport 5 | ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 81 |
| DriverReviews owners | 88 | 86 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Pilot Sport 5 | Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 89 | 70 |
| Dry | 91 | 89 |
| Wet | 90 | 75 |
| Snow | – | 36 |
| Comfort | 84 | 34 |
| Noise | 86 | 52 |
| Treadwear | 90 | 78 |
| Handling | 95 | 81 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Tire A | Tire B | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 97% #8/48 · 2023 Summer Tyre Market Overview | 97% #8/45 · 2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout | +0.2 | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 99% #4/13 · 2023 AutoBild Sports Car Summer Tyre Test | 98% #14/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | +0.7 | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 98% #4/6 · The BEST Performance Tyres Tested | 82% #7/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | +15.2 | Different tests |
| Noise | Other | 99% #3/6 · 2024 TopTireReview Best UHP Tyres for Asia Test | 95% #2/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | +4.2 | Different tests |
| Price | Other | 100% #13/13 · 2023 AutoBild Sports Car Summer Tyre Test | 79% #17/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | +21.2 | Different tests |
| Value | Other | 89% #15/20 · 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test | 93% #17/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | -4.6 | Different tests |
| Wear | Other | 93% #2/20 · 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test | 66% #14/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | +27.3 | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 50% #2/7 · 2026 AutoView Sport Tyre Test | 11% #9/11 · 2018 Auto Review 225/45 R17 Tyre Test | +38.9 | Different tests |
| Straight Aqua | Straight | 99% #3/10 · 2025 AZ Summer Tyre Test | 92% #15/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | +6.3 | Different tests |
| Subj. Comfort | Subj | 98% #2/9 · 2022/23 Tyre Reviews 17 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 56% #17/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | +42.4 | Different tests |
| Total Cost of Ownership | Total | 0% #3/6 · The BEST Performance Tyres Tested | 0% #14/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 0 | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 95% #7/48 · 2023 Summer Tyre Market Overview | 87% #21/45 · 2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout | +8.2 | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 88% #2/7 · Michelin Range Test - CrossClimate 3, 3 Sport, Primacy 5, Pilot Sport 5 and Cup 2 | 95% #16/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | -6 | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Michelin Pilot Sport 5 is widely regarded as a premier ultra-high-performance tire that excels in balancing daily comfort with impressive wet and dry grip. While many users praise its longevity and refinement compared to its predecessor, some enthusiasts note a slight reduction in steering sharpness and feedback, positioning it more as a sophisticated grand-touring tire than a dedicated track-focused performance tire.
Pros
- Exceptional wet weather performance and hydroplaning resistance
- High levels of comfort and reduced road noise compared to many competitors
- Strong tread life and durability for an ultra-high-performance tire
- Predictable and confidence-inspiring handling in daily driving conditions
Cons
- Softer sidewall construction leads to less steering precision and feedback
- Tendency toward understeer when pushed to the absolute limit
- Higher price point compared to some direct competitors
- Reports of uneven wear or 'out-of-round' issues near the end of the tire's life
Observations
- EV owners report a noticeable decrease in range due to higher rolling resistance compared to OEM efficiency-focused tires.
- Users transitioning from run-flat tires consistently report a significant improvement in ride quality and cabin noise.
- Drivers of high-horsepower vehicles note that while grip is excellent for street use, the tire can overheat and lose performance during aggressive track sessions.
The Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 is widely regarded as a high-value, street-oriented summer performance tire that excels in dry grip and steering responsiveness. While it is a favorite among owners of lightweight sports cars like the Mazda MX-5 and Toyota MR2, users note that its softer sidewall construction prioritizes ride comfort over the razor-sharp precision required for dedicated track use.
Pros
- Excellent dry weather traction and predictable handling near the limit.
- Strong value proposition, offering performance comparable to premium tires at a lower price point.
- Surprisingly quiet and comfortable ride quality for a performance-oriented tire.
- Good availability in niche, smaller rim sizes (e.g., 15-inch) that are often neglected by other manufacturers.
- Reliable wet weather performance for daily driving conditions.
Cons
- Softer sidewalls can lead to a 'bouncy' or less precise feel during aggressive cornering.
- Inconsistent tread life reports, with some users experiencing rapid wear under spirited driving or improper alignment.
- Not suitable for track-day abuse, as the compound can overheat and lose grip during extended high-intensity sessions.
- Some reports of increased road noise on specific asphalt surfaces or after the tire has aged.
- Occasional quality control issues, such as tires being 'out of round' or difficult to balance.
Observations
- Owners of lightweight sports cars (Miata, MR2, Honda CRX) frequently praise the tire for balancing daily comfort with enough grip for spirited back-road driving.
- Users with heavier or more powerful vehicles occasionally report that the tire's sidewall flex is noticeable, leading to a less 'planted' feel compared to stiffer UHP alternatives.
- Drivers running 15-inch and 16-inch sizes appreciate the tire as one of the few remaining high-performance options for their vehicles.
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
Community opinion on the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 is largely positive, highlighting its exceptional wet grip, low road noise, and impressive tread life compared to older generations and direct rivals. While some enthusiast drivers find the sidewalls a bit soft or note less extreme dry grip and steering feel compared to hardcore track tires like the PS4S or SportContact 7, it is widely praised as the ultimate daily-driver performance tire.
“My 8-month experience with Michelin Pilot Sport 5 – honest thoughts after highway + city use Switched to Michelin Pilot Sport 5s about 8 months ago on my Hyundai Creta]and figured I'd share a proper update since I couldn't find many India-based long-term reviews when I was researching. Background: I drive a mix of Delhi–Gurugram highway stretches and stop-go city traffic. Previous tyres were Ceat tyres. Wet grip: This is where they genuinely shine. Monsoon season in NCR was the real test — braking distances felt noticeably shorter than my previous set, and I never had that nervous moment on waterlogged roads near Dhaula Kuan. Dry handling: Confident and predictable. Not much to complain about here. Cornering feel is crisp, especially at highway speeds. Ride comfort: Slightly firmer than my old tyres, which I expected given the performance focus. Not harsh — just different. Long highway runs are still comfortable. Noise: Quieter than I expected for a performance tyre. Road noise on concrete sections of NH-48 is very manageable. Fuel efficiency: Marginal difference — maybe 0.3–0.5 kmpl lower, hard to say definitively. Wear so far: Looking good at 8 months / ~7,000 km. No uneven wear patterns. Would I buy again? Probably yes, especially if wet weather safety matters to you. Price premium over budget options is real, but the wet grip gives peace of mind. Happy to answer any questions. Anyone else running Michelins in Indian conditions? Read more”
“Tyres: Ps5’s initial impression Tyres seem to be a common question across a few forums so I thought ide share. So after 12 months (27,000kms) with my i20n, I was (over) due to replace my tyres. While I loved the p-zeros, I wasn’t keen on the short life, so went with the pilot sport 5. My impressions as follows: Initial impression: a lot less road noise than the p-zero City drive: no noticeable difference (apart from the reduced noise) Highway drive: handling is not noticeably changed, but the reduced noise is really appreciated here! Twisty’s: the difference here is notable, ps5’s don’t provide quite the same aggressive limitless grip feel as the p-zeros. Still holds the line perfectly but noted a bit of slip on the inside front wheel under heavy throttle. I do approx 100km on back roads commuting to and from work every day, so I’ll update this thread if I find anything worth reporting Read more”
“In my experience they are quite long wearing tires and well worth the cost. I used to get around 40k out of most tyres. My first set of ps4’s lasted 55k and now the ps5’s are trending to beat it. I'm a pretty spirited driver around the roundabouts of Canberra too, though I only have a hatch so experiences may vary. As to performance I've driven them on my i30 n-line and other people’s i30N, BRZ, tesla 3, and stinger and the tyres have more grip than I have guts to push them on public roads. In both wet and dry they are very confidence inspiring and a hell of a lot of fun.”
“Had both on my ST. The 4S is more performance oriented but it wore out much quicker in approximately 35k kms. PS5 is more comfortable and the wear is slower however it does get noisy towards its end of life. After the 2 sets of Michelins, I tried the Falken FK520 for half the cost of the Michelins but found it to more comfortable for daily driving as it is comparatively softer.”
Based on 130 community posts
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Community opinion on the Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 is generally very positive, with users frequently considering them as affordable, high-performing summer tires ideal for daily driving, spirited backroad runs, and wet conditions. Many drivers compare them favorably or as cost-effective alternatives to premium options like Michelin Pilot Sports, though questions occasionally arise regarding their exact lifespan and wear compared to all-season alternatives.
“Suggestiona on tyres Hi everyone, Just wanted to ask if you guys ever had Yokohama Advan Fleva V701. My FK2 has nearly 400bhp and I’m not using it daily anymore as I want it to preserve the baby. My drive is a bit aggressive occasionally but nothing crazy or track day as I don’t have the time. I would like to know if you guys ever had this specific type of tyre. What you think about? They’re actually good? I wouldn’t like to buy again the Michelin pilot sport 4s which I found absolutely rubbish. I found those yoko for the decent price of 98£ each. So I buy it or should I move to Pirelli PZero pZ4 sport ?”
“Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 in 2026 Do they make sense today? I’d put them on a hatchback (1300kg) and I usually drive up to 180-200 km/h with quick accelerations and curves in my daily. Weather is usually sunny, but sometimes it rains. Are them still a safe and a good choice, or are there some other brands that should result better for my driving style (and for my 215/45 r18 rims)? Thanks in advance.”
“Yokohama advan fleva v701? Currently looking at stock sizes for my 99 MRS and the v701s are the only decent set I can find. I live in Canada and I was planning on ordering them for next week, and just thought to do one more validation check before driving out to Bellingham. Pretty new to picking out my own tires, trying to also stay within 550-600usd or maxish 800-850cad including tax if possible.”
Based on 20 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Pilot Sport 5 | B · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Max Performance tires | Summer Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | — | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 37 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | — | 9/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 300 A A |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Michelin
Yokohama
Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport 5 — better comfort, noise and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Michelin Pilot Sport 5 scores 84 vs 34 on comfort.
Michelin Pilot Sport 5 scores 86 vs 52 on noise.
Michelin Pilot Sport 5 scores 90 vs 75 on wet.
Michelin Pilot Sport 5 scores 95 vs 81 on handling.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.