Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Bridgestone

Bridgestone Turanza T005

Summer Premium Touring tires

Bridgestone Turanza T005 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
88/100
36 professional tests
User signal (40%)
72/100
181 owner reviews
Dry
84
Wet
81
Snow
–
Comfort
69
Noise
81
Treadwear
66
Handling
72

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Yokohama

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701

Summer Ultra High Performance tires

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
66/100
2 professional tests
User signal (40%)
82/100
253 owner reviews
Dry
89
Wet
75
Snow
36
Comfort
34
Noise
52
Treadwear
78
Handling
81

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Bridgestone Turanza T005 — better comfort, noise and wet. Pick the Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 if treadwear, handling and dry matter most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) ADVAN Fleva V701 leads by 5
A — Bridgestone Turanza T005
84
B — Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
89
Why this score
SourceTuranza T005ADVAN Fleva V701
Professional tests (TWG score) 87 90
Tire Rack owners 86 90
Tyre Reviews owners 80 85
SimpleTire owners – 88
Dry Braking (% of best) 100% 97%
Dry Handling (% of best) 97% 98%

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Turanza T005 leads by 6
A — Bridgestone Turanza T005
81
B — Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
75
Why this score
SourceTuranza T005ADVAN Fleva V701
Professional tests (TWG score) 83 71
Tire Rack owners 82 80
Tyre Reviews owners 77 78
SimpleTire owners – 79
Wet Braking (% of best) 100% 87%
Wet Handling (% of best) 92% 95%

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Bridgestone Turanza T005
–
B — Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
36
Why this score
SourceTuranza T005ADVAN Fleva V701
SimpleTire owners – 47

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Turanza T005 leads by 35
A — Bridgestone Turanza T005
69
B — Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
34
Why this score
SourceTuranza T005ADVAN Fleva V701
Professional tests (TWG score) 67 2
Tire Rack owners 83 84
Tyre Reviews owners 72 75
SimpleTire owners – 84

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Turanza T005 leads by 29
A — Bridgestone Turanza T005
81
B — Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
52
Why this score
SourceTuranza T005ADVAN Fleva V701
Professional tests (TWG score) 81 34
SimpleTire owners – 83

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) ADVAN Fleva V701 leads by 12
A — Bridgestone Turanza T005
66
B — Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
78
Why this score
SourceTuranza T005ADVAN Fleva V701
Tire Rack owners 67 79
Tyre Reviews owners 66 77
SimpleTire owners – 79

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) ADVAN Fleva V701 leads by 9
A — Bridgestone Turanza T005
72
B — Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
81
Why this score
SourceTuranza T005ADVAN Fleva V701
Tyre Reviews owners 72 81
DriverReviews owners 84 86

Scores at a glance

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone Turanza T005Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Relative Score 75 70
Dry 84 89
Wet 81 75
Snow – 36
Comfort 69 34
Noise 81 52
Treadwear 66 78
Handling 72 81

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Test data

The professional test results behind the scores

Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.

DisciplineCategoryTire ATire BΔBoth?
Dry Braking Dry 100% #1/14 · 2018 New and Worn Summer Tyre Test 97% #6/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test +2.8 Different tests
Dry Handling Dry 97% #11/11 · 2019 Auto Bild Sports Car Tyre Test 98% #14/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test -1.8 Different tests
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 85% #1/6 · 2024 Sport Auto Summer Tyre Test 82% #7/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test +2.5 Different tests
Noise Other 99% #3/12 · 2020 Tyre Reviews Ultimate Summer Tyre Test 95% #2/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test +3.5 Different tests
Price Other 95% #4/8 · 2023 Motor Summer Tyre Test 79% #17/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test +15.8 Different tests
Value Other 86% #13/20 · 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test 93% #17/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test -6.8 Different tests
Wear Other 57% #17/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test 66% #14/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test -9.7 Different tests
Overall Ranking Overall 50% #2/47 · 2018 AutoBild Summer Tyre Overview 11% #9/11 · 2018 Auto Review 225/45 R17 Tyre Test +38.9 Different tests
Straight Aqua Straight 89% #7/10 · 2022 AMS Performance Summer Tyre Test 92% #15/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test -3.5 Different tests
Subj. Comfort Subj 78% #8/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 56% #17/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test +22.2 Same test
Total Cost of Ownership Total 0% #5/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 0% #14/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 0 Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 100% #1/20 · 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test 87% #21/45 · 2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout +12.8 Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 92% #6/7 · 2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tyre Test 95% #16/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test -2.1 Different tests
From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Bridgestone Turanza T005

The Bridgestone Turanza T005 is a polarizing touring tire that excels in wet-weather safety and fuel efficiency but faces significant criticism regarding its longevity and ride comfort. While many users praise its wet-road confidence and predictable handling, a substantial portion of the user base reports premature tread wear, sidewall cracking, and high road noise, leading to a highly divided consensus.

Pros

  • Exceptional wet-weather grip and aquaplaning resistance
  • High fuel efficiency and low rolling resistance
  • Predictable and safe handling for daily commuting
  • Strong dry-road braking performance

Cons

  • Rapid and uneven tread wear reported by many users
  • High levels of road noise and cabin resonance
  • Reports of sidewall cracking and premature aging
  • Soft sidewalls leading to vague steering feedback and lack of precision

Observations

  • Users with high-torque EVs and performance-oriented vehicles frequently report excessive wheel spin and rapid wear due to the tire's compound.
  • Drivers of premium sedans (BMW, Audi) often note a significant improvement in comfort when switching from run-flat tires to the T005, though some find the ride still too firm.
  • Owners of heavier vehicles or those driving on poor-quality road surfaces report that the soft sidewalls are vulnerable to impact damage and bubbling.
Tire B Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701

The Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 is widely regarded as a high-value, street-oriented summer performance tire that excels in dry grip and steering responsiveness. While it is a favorite among owners of lightweight sports cars like the Mazda MX-5 and Toyota MR2, users note that its softer sidewall construction prioritizes ride comfort over the razor-sharp precision required for dedicated track use.

Pros

  • Excellent dry weather traction and predictable handling near the limit.
  • Strong value proposition, offering performance comparable to premium tires at a lower price point.
  • Surprisingly quiet and comfortable ride quality for a performance-oriented tire.
  • Good availability in niche, smaller rim sizes (e.g., 15-inch) that are often neglected by other manufacturers.
  • Reliable wet weather performance for daily driving conditions.

Cons

  • Softer sidewalls can lead to a 'bouncy' or less precise feel during aggressive cornering.
  • Inconsistent tread life reports, with some users experiencing rapid wear under spirited driving or improper alignment.
  • Not suitable for track-day abuse, as the compound can overheat and lose grip during extended high-intensity sessions.
  • Some reports of increased road noise on specific asphalt surfaces or after the tire has aged.
  • Occasional quality control issues, such as tires being 'out of round' or difficult to balance.

Observations

  • Owners of lightweight sports cars (Miata, MR2, Honda CRX) frequently praise the tire for balancing daily comfort with enough grip for spirited back-road driving.
  • Users with heavier or more powerful vehicles occasionally report that the tire's sidewall flex is noticeable, leading to a less 'planted' feel compared to stiffer UHP alternatives.
  • Drivers running 15-inch and 16-inch sizes appreciate the tire as one of the few remaining high-performance options for their vehicles.
Community buzz

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Bridgestone Turanza T005

Mixed

Community opinions on the Bridgestone Turanza T005 are divided. While some drivers praise its wet-weather performance, highway stability, and value compared to competitors like Michelin, others report issues with excessive road noise, stiff comfort levels, rapid wear, and poor grip in certain conditions.

Top themes
#Wet and dry grip#Road noise and comfort#Treadwear and durability#Run-flat performance#Price and value

Based on 23 community posts

Tire B

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701

Positive

Community opinion on the Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 is generally very positive, with users frequently considering them as affordable, high-performing summer tires ideal for daily driving, spirited backroad runs, and wet conditions. Many drivers compare them favorably or as cost-effective alternatives to premium options like Michelin Pilot Sports, though questions occasionally arise regarding their exact lifespan and wear compared to all-season alternatives.

r/Civic_Type_R ·3 upvotes ·2026-09-05

“Suggestiona on tyres Hi everyone, Just wanted to ask if you guys ever had Yokohama Advan Fleva V701. My FK2 has nearly 400bhp and I’m not using it daily anymore as I want it to preserve the baby. My drive is a bit aggressive occasionally but nothing crazy or track day as I don’t have the time. I would like to know if you guys ever had this specific type of tyre. What you think about? They’re actually good? I wouldn’t like to buy again the Michelin pilot sport 4s which I found absolutely rubbish. I found those yoko for the decent price of 98£ each. So I buy it or should I move to Pirelli PZero pZ4 sport ?”

r/TyreReviews ·2 upvotes ·2026-06-06

“Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 in 2026 Do they make sense today? I’d put them on a hatchback (1300kg) and I usually drive up to 180-200 km/h with quick accelerations and curves in my daily. Weather is usually sunny, but sometimes it rains. Are them still a safe and a good choice, or are there some other brands that should result better for my driving style (and for my 215/45 r18 rims)? Thanks in advance.”

r/mr2 ·2 upvotes ·2025-05-24

“Yokohama advan fleva v701? Currently looking at stock sizes for my 99 MRS and the v701s are the only decent set I can find. I live in Canada and I was planning on ordering them for next week, and just thought to do one more validation check before driving out to Bellingham. Pretty new to picking out my own tires, trying to also stay within 550-600usd or maxish 800-850cad including tax if possible.”

Top themes
#Daily driving comfort#Spirited backroad performance#Wet and dry grip#Value and pricing#Lifespan and tread wear#Comparison with Michelin

Based on 20 community posts

Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Turanza T005 B · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
CategorySummer Premium Touring tiresSummer Ultra High Performance tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available2437
Rim diameters16″ – 22″15″ – 20″
Tread depth—9/32″
UTQG340 A A300 A A
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure—51 psi
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone

Yokohama

Winner: Bridgestone Turanza T005 — better comfort, noise and wet. Pick the Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 if treadwear, handling and dry matter most to you.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Bridgestone Turanza T005 scores 69 vs 34 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want a quieter cabin

Bridgestone Turanza T005 scores 81 vs 52 on noise.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 78 vs 66 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 81 vs 72 on handling.

Tire A · Bridgestone Turanza T005
Tire B · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.