78
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
79/100
12 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra vs Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
65
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
65/100
24 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra — better snow, handling and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Alenza AS Ultra leads by 14
Why this score
| Source | Alenza AS Ultra | Ecopia EP422 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 91 | 81 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 82 | 60 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Alenza AS Ultra leads by 17
Why this score
| Source | Alenza AS Ultra | Ecopia EP422 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 88 | 74 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 76 | 57 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Alenza AS Ultra leads by 21
Why this score
| Source | Alenza AS Ultra | Ecopia EP422 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 78 | 54 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 68 | – |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Alenza AS Ultra leads by 12
Why this score
| Source | Alenza AS Ultra | Ecopia EP422 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 85 | 77 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 74 | 64 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Alenza AS Ultra leads by 10
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Alenza AS Ultra leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | Alenza AS Ultra | Ecopia EP422 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 78 | 72 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 55 | 53 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Alenza AS Ultra leads by 19
Why this score
| Source | Alenza AS Ultra | Ecopia EP422 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 74 | 55 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra | Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 78 | 65 |
| Dry | 88 | 74 |
| Wet | 83 | 66 |
| Snow | 81 | 60 |
| Comfort | 83 | 71 |
| Noise | 80 | 70 |
| Treadwear | 66 | 63 |
| Handling | 74 | 55 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
78
/ 100
Tire A
65
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra presents a polarized user experience, characterized by a significant divide between those praising its wet and dry handling performance and those disappointed by its longevity and noise levels. While some users report exceptional tread life and reliable all-season traction, others cite premature wear and intrusive road noise, suggesting that performance may vary significantly based on vehicle application and driving conditions.
Pros
- Strong traction on both wet and dry road surfaces
- Improved ride comfort and handling compared to some factory-installed alternatives
- Capable performance in varied weather conditions for some users
- High durability reported by long-term users
Cons
- Reports of premature tread wear and short service life
- Noticeable road noise compared to other premium tires
- Inconsistent performance in severe winter conditions, particularly on ice and deep snow
- Potential for reduced fuel economy
Observations
- Users on heavy SUVs and trucks report mixed results, with some achieving high mileage while others experience rapid tread degradation.
- Drivers transitioning from OEM tires, such as the Bridgestone Ecopia, have noted a distinct increase in cabin noise levels.
- Regular maintenance, specifically rotations every 5,000 miles, is highlighted as critical for maximizing the lifespan of this tire.
The Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus is a polarizing tire that excels in fuel efficiency and initial comfort but frequently disappoints users regarding tread longevity and wet-weather performance. While many owners appreciate its low rolling resistance and quiet ride when new, a significant portion of the user base reports premature wear and a noticeable increase in road noise as the tire ages.
Pros
- Excellent fuel economy due to low rolling resistance
- High level of ride comfort and noise suppression when new
- Predictable handling for daily commuting and highway driving
- Good dry traction for standard, non-spirited driving
Cons
- Significant premature tread wear failing to meet mileage expectations
- Poor performance in snow and ice conditions
- Increased road noise and vibration as the tire wears
- Lack of grip during spirited driving or in heavy rain
Observations
- SUV and Crossover owners (e.g., Mazda CX-9, Subaru Forester) frequently report that the tire's sidewall stiffness and grip limits are insufficient for the vehicle's weight and handling characteristics.
- Users of smaller, lighter vehicles (e.g., VW Jetta, Toyota Yaris) tend to report higher satisfaction with comfort and noise levels compared to those driving larger SUVs.
- Multiple reports indicate that the tire's performance degrades significantly after the first 20,000–30,000 miles, particularly regarding noise and vibration.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra | B · Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Premium Touring tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | — | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 46 | — |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 22″ | — |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 800 A A | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 80,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
78
/ 100
Bridgestone
65
/ 100
Bridgestone
Winner: Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra — better snow, handling and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You drive through snowy winters
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra scores 81 vs 60 on snow.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra scores 74 vs 55 on handling.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra scores 83 vs 66 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra scores 88 vs 74 on dry.
Tire A · Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra
Tire B · Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus
More comparisons
Also compared with
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra also compared with
Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.