Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

Bridgestone Ecopia H/L 422 Plus vs Kumho 758 — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

VS
Tire B Kumho

Kumho 758

Summer Touring tires

Kumho 758 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
69/100
4 owner reviews
Dry
63
Wet
70
Snow
–
Comfort
65
Noise
–
Treadwear
95
Handling
73

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Kumho 758 — better treadwear and wet. Pick the Bridgestone Ecopia H/L 422 Plus if dry and comfort matter most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Ecopia H/L 422 Plus leads by 11
A — Bridgestone Ecopia H/L 422 Plus
74
B — Kumho 758
63
Why this score
SourceEcopia H/L 422 Plus758
Tire Rack owners 84 –
Tyre Reviews owners – 63
SimpleTire owners 88 –

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) 758 leads by 9
A — Bridgestone Ecopia H/L 422 Plus
61
B — Kumho 758
70
Why this score
SourceEcopia H/L 422 Plus758
Tire Rack owners 75 –
Tyre Reviews owners – 70
SimpleTire owners 75 –

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Bridgestone Ecopia H/L 422 Plus
31
B — Kumho 758
–
Why this score
SourceEcopia H/L 422 Plus758
Tire Rack owners 50 –
SimpleTire owners 60 –

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Ecopia H/L 422 Plus leads by 6
A — Bridgestone Ecopia H/L 422 Plus
71
B — Kumho 758
65
Why this score
SourceEcopia H/L 422 Plus758
Tire Rack owners 76 –
Tyre Reviews owners – 65
SimpleTire owners 77 –

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Bridgestone Ecopia H/L 422 Plus
69
B — Kumho 758
–
Why this score
SourceEcopia H/L 422 Plus758
SimpleTire owners 70 –

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) 758 leads by 46
A — Bridgestone Ecopia H/L 422 Plus
49
B — Kumho 758
95
Why this score
SourceEcopia H/L 422 Plus758
Tire Rack owners 66 –
Tyre Reviews owners – 95
SimpleTire owners 73 –

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Bridgestone Ecopia H/L 422 Plus
73
B — Kumho 758
73
Why this score
SourceEcopia H/L 422 Plus758
Tyre Reviews owners – 73

Scores at a glance

Bridgestone Ecopia H/L 422 Plus vs Kumho 758: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone Ecopia H/L 422 PlusKumho 758
Relative Score 63 75
Dry 74 63
Wet 61 70
Snow 31 –
Comfort 71 65
Noise 69 –
Treadwear 49 95
Handling 73 73

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Bridgestone Ecopia H/L 422 Plus

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Kumho 758

The Kumho 758 is generally regarded as a reliable, long-lasting tire that provides competent handling and braking performance in both wet and dry conditions. While it earns praise for its durability and water drainage capabilities, some users report significant compromises in ride comfort and cabin noise levels.

Pros

  • Strong handling and braking performance on both wet and dry surfaces
  • Excellent water drainage
  • Exceptional tread longevity
  • Reliable overall road manners

Cons

  • Noticeable road noise
  • Subpar ride comfort
  • Inconsistent user experience regarding refinement

Observations

  • Users consistently highlight the tire's durability, suggesting it is well-suited for high-mileage drivers who prioritize longevity over ride quality.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Ecopia H/L 422 Plus B · Kumho 758
Category—Summer Touring tires
Vehicle type—Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available19—
Rim diameters15″ – 20″—
Tread depth9/32″—
UTQG600 A A—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure51 psi—
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone

Kumho

Winner: Kumho 758 — better treadwear and wet. Pick the Bridgestone Ecopia H/L 422 Plus if dry and comfort matter most to you.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Kumho 758 scores 95 vs 49 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Bridgestone Ecopia H/L 422 Plus scores 74 vs 63 on dry.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho 758 scores 70 vs 61 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Bridgestone Ecopia H/L 422 Plus scores 71 vs 65 on comfort.

Tire A · Bridgestone Ecopia H/L 422 Plus
Tire B · Kumho 758

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.