74
/ 100
Objective (60%)
72/100
2 professional tests
User signal (40%)
78/100
13 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Hankook Kinergy 4S vs Kumho 758 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
75
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
69/100
4 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictToo close to call: Hankook Kinergy 4S and Kumho 758 are within 2 points overall. Hankook Kinergy 4S is stronger on dry, comfort and wet. Kumho 758 is stronger on treadwear and handling.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Kinergy 4S leads by 12
Why this score
| Source | Kinergy 4S | 758 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 70 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 82 | 63 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Kinergy 4S leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | Kinergy 4S | 758 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 77 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 76 | 70 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Kinergy 4S | 758 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 69 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 93 | – |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Kinergy 4S leads by 12
Why this score
| Source | Kinergy 4S | 758 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 77 | 65 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Kinergy 4S | 758 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 95 | – |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
758 leads by 23
Why this score
| Source | Kinergy 4S | 758 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 72 | 95 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
758 leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | Kinergy 4S | 758 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 68 | 73 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Kinergy 4S | Kumho 758 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 74 | 75 |
| Dry | 75 | 63 |
| Wet | 77 | 70 |
| Snow | 79 | – |
| Comfort | 77 | 65 |
| Noise | 95 | – |
| Treadwear | 72 | 95 |
| Handling | 68 | 73 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
74
/ 100
Tire A
75
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Hankook Kinergy 4S is generally regarded as a highly capable all-season tire, particularly praised for its impressive performance in wet, cold, and snowy conditions. While many users report excellent traction and safety in adverse weather, the tire receives mixed feedback regarding its tread longevity and consistency in dry-weather handling.
Pros
- Exceptional grip and stability in wet and torrential rain conditions
- Strong performance in snow and slush, often cited as a viable alternative to dedicated winter tires
- High value-for-money proposition compared to premium competitors
- Reliable emergency braking performance on slick surfaces
Cons
- Reports of premature tread wear and shorter-than-expected service life
- Inconsistent dry-road handling and feedback compared to dedicated summer tires
- Occasional reports of poor traction on greasy or specific wet road surfaces
- Increased road noise noted by some users
Observations
- Users of compact SUVs, such as the Honda CR-V, have reported significantly lower tread life than expected for the vehicle class.
- Drivers of performance-oriented vehicles, such as the Civic Type R, noted a trade-off in lateral grip and steering feedback when switching from dedicated summer tires.
The Kumho 758 is generally regarded as a reliable, long-lasting tire that provides competent handling and braking performance in both wet and dry conditions. While it earns praise for its durability and water drainage capabilities, some users report significant compromises in ride comfort and cabin noise levels.
Pros
- Strong handling and braking performance on both wet and dry surfaces
- Excellent water drainage
- Exceptional tread longevity
- Reliable overall road manners
Cons
- Noticeable road noise
- Subpar ride comfort
- Inconsistent user experience regarding refinement
Observations
- Users consistently highlight the tire's durability, suggesting it is well-suited for high-mileage drivers who prioritize longevity over ride quality.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Kinergy 4S | B · Kumho 758 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season High Performance tires | Summer Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
74
/ 100
Hankook
75
/ 100
Kumho
Too close to call: Hankook Kinergy 4S and Kumho 758 are within 2 points overall. Hankook Kinergy 4S is stronger on dry, comfort and wet. Kumho 758 is stronger on treadwear and handling.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Kumho 758 scores 95 vs 72 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Hankook Kinergy 4S scores 75 vs 63 on dry.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Hankook Kinergy 4S scores 77 vs 65 on comfort.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Hankook Kinergy 4S scores 77 vs 70 on wet.
Tire A · Hankook Kinergy 4S
Tire B · Kumho 758
More comparisons
Also compared with
Hankook Kinergy 4S also compared with
Kumho 758 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.