79
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
75/100
16 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Bridgestone Potenza RE070R RFT vs Firestone Firehawk 900 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
84
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
86/100
5 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Firestone Firehawk 900 — better treadwear and comfort. Pick the Bridgestone Potenza RE070R RFT if dry and handling matter most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Potenza RE070R RFT leads by 12
Why this score
| Source | Potenza RE070R RFT | Firehawk 900 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 95 | 78 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Firehawk 900 leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | Potenza RE070R RFT | Firehawk 900 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 35 | 80 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Firehawk 900 leads by 16
Why this score
| Source | Potenza RE070R RFT | Firehawk 900 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 40 | 90 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Firehawk 900 leads by 19
Why this score
| Source | Potenza RE070R RFT | Firehawk 900 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 25 | 88 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Potenza RE070R RFT leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | Potenza RE070R RFT | Firehawk 900 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 85 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Potenza RE070R RFT | Firestone Firehawk 900 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 79 | 84 |
| Dry | 90 | 78 |
| Wet | 78 | 80 |
| Snow | 50 | – |
| Comfort | 74 | 90 |
| Noise | 85 | – |
| Treadwear | 69 | 88 |
| Handling | 90 | 85 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
79
/ 100
Tire A
84
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Potenza RE070R RFT is a polarizing run-flat tire that excels in dry-weather performance and structural durability, though it faces criticism regarding its longevity and wet-weather handling. While many users appreciate its quiet ride and responsiveness, others report significant concerns regarding tread life and the high cost associated with the run-flat technology.
Pros
- Exceptional dry-weather grip and handling responsiveness
- Effective run-flat capability providing peace of mind during emergencies
- Surprisingly low noise levels for a performance-oriented run-flat tire
- Robust sidewall construction that offers protection against road hazards
Cons
- Poor performance and lack of confidence in wet or greasy road conditions
- Rapid tread wear leading to short service life for some users
- High price point compared to standard non-run-flat alternatives
- Susceptibility to sidewall ruptures under certain highway conditions
Observations
- Users noted that the tire maintains a surprisingly comfortable ride quality when transitioning from standard tires to these run-flats.
- High-power vehicle owners report that the tire's grip is excellent in dry conditions but becomes unpredictable and 'unnerving' in wet weather.
The Firestone Firehawk 900 is generally regarded as a reliable, balanced tire that offers commendable grip in both wet and dry conditions. While users appreciate its durability and comfort over rough road surfaces, the consensus is frequently tempered by reports of significant road noise, particularly with run-flat variants.
Pros
- Reliable wet and dry traction
- Strong durability and impact resistance against potholes
- High level of ride comfort and bump absorption
- Competitive price-to-performance ratio
Cons
- Noticeable road noise, especially at lower speeds
- Run-flat variants may be unsuitable for certain vehicle suspension setups
- Dry grip performance can degrade noticeably as the tire ages
Observations
- Users operating on poor road infrastructure report high satisfaction with the tire's structural integrity.
- Owners of premium vehicles like the Audi TT have reported dissatisfaction with noise levels when using run-flat versions of this tire.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Potenza RE070R RFT | B · Firestone Firehawk 900 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Extreme Performance tires | Summer High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
79
/ 100
Bridgestone
84
/ 100
Firestone
Winner: Firestone Firehawk 900 — better treadwear and comfort. Pick the Bridgestone Potenza RE070R RFT if dry and handling matter most to you.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Firestone Firehawk 900 scores 88 vs 69 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Firestone Firehawk 900 scores 90 vs 74 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Bridgestone Potenza RE070R RFT scores 90 vs 78 on dry.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Bridgestone Potenza RE070R RFT scores 90 vs 85 on handling.
Tire A · Bridgestone Potenza RE070R RFT
Tire B · Firestone Firehawk 900
More comparisons
Also compared with
Bridgestone Potenza RE070R RFT also compared with
Firestone Firehawk 900 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.