Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

Bridgestone Potenza RE97AS RFT vs Firestone Firehawk AS — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

VS
Tire B Firestone

Firestone Firehawk AS

All Season High Performance tires

Firestone Firehawk AS tread pattern
Objective (60%)
/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
88/100
18 owner reviews
Dry
94
Wet
87
Snow
79
Comfort
94
Noise
90
Treadwear
92
Handling
70

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Firestone Firehawk AS — better treadwear, comfort and noise. Pick the Bridgestone Potenza RE97AS RFT if handling matters most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Firehawk AS leads by 16
A — Bridgestone Potenza RE97AS RFT
78
B — Firestone Firehawk AS
94
Why this score
SourcePotenza RE97AS RFTFirehawk AS
Tire Rack owners 82
Tyre Reviews owners 75

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Firehawk AS leads by 16
A — Bridgestone Potenza RE97AS RFT
71
B — Firestone Firehawk AS
87
Why this score
SourcePotenza RE97AS RFTFirehawk AS
Tire Rack owners 73
Tyre Reviews owners 50

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Firehawk AS leads by 25
A — Bridgestone Potenza RE97AS RFT
54
B — Firestone Firehawk AS
79
Why this score
SourcePotenza RE97AS RFTFirehawk AS
Tire Rack owners 58
Tyre Reviews owners 45

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Firehawk AS leads by 34
A — Bridgestone Potenza RE97AS RFT
60
B — Firestone Firehawk AS
94
Why this score
SourcePotenza RE97AS RFTFirehawk AS
Tire Rack owners 65
Tyre Reviews owners 75

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Firehawk AS leads by 30
A — Bridgestone Potenza RE97AS RFT
60
B — Firestone Firehawk AS
90

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Firehawk AS leads by 49
A — Bridgestone Potenza RE97AS RFT
43
B — Firestone Firehawk AS
92
Why this score
SourcePotenza RE97AS RFTFirehawk AS
Tire Rack owners 48
Tyre Reviews owners 75

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Potenza RE97AS RFT leads by 9
A — Bridgestone Potenza RE97AS RFT
79
B — Firestone Firehawk AS
70
Why this score
SourcePotenza RE97AS RFTFirehawk AS
Tyre Reviews owners 70

Scores at a glance

Bridgestone Potenza RE97AS RFT vs Firestone Firehawk AS: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone Potenza RE97AS RFTFirestone Firehawk AS
Relative Score 62 87
Dry 78 94
Wet 71 87
Snow 54 79
Comfort 60 94
Noise 60 90
Treadwear 43 92
Handling 79 70

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Bridgestone Potenza RE97AS RFT

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Firestone Firehawk AS

The Firestone FireHawk AS is generally regarded as a high-value, sporty all-season tire that offers impressive dry grip and handling characteristics. While many users praise its longevity and aesthetic appeal, there is a notable divide regarding its wet-weather performance, with some users reporting significant concerns regarding hydroplaning.

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and durability
  • Strong dry traction and cornering stability
  • Attractive aesthetic design
  • High value-to-price ratio
  • Responsive steering feedback and sidewall stiffness

Cons

  • Significant concerns regarding hydroplaning in heavy rain
  • Potential for tread cracking after extended high-mileage use
  • Availability issues at local retail outlets

Observations

  • Owners of RWD performance vehicles like the Ford Mustang and Infiniti G35 report high satisfaction with cornering and handling.
  • The tire demonstrates robust durability on high-torque FWD vehicles, effectively resisting belt shifting compared to other brands.
  • Drivers of heavy, body-on-frame sedans appreciate the increased sidewall stiffness for improved steering feedback.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Potenza RE97AS RFT B · Firestone Firehawk AS
CategoryAll Season High Performance tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available4
Rim diameters15″ – 18″
Tread depth11/32″
UTQG480 A A
Treadwear warranty50,000 mi
SidewallBlackwall
Max pressure44 psi
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone

Firestone

Winner: Firestone Firehawk AS — better treadwear, comfort and noise. Pick the Bridgestone Potenza RE97AS RFT if handling matters most to you.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Firestone Firehawk AS scores 92 vs 43 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Firestone Firehawk AS scores 94 vs 60 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Firestone Firehawk AS scores 90 vs 60 on noise.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Firestone Firehawk AS scores 79 vs 54 on snow.

Tire A · Bridgestone Potenza RE97AS RFT
Tire B · Firestone Firehawk AS

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.