61
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
52/100
3 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
BFGoodrich Advantage T/A vs Firestone Firehawk AS — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
87
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
88/100
18 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Firestone Firehawk AS — better snow, comfort and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Firehawk AS leads by 14
Why this score
| Source | Advantage T/A | Firehawk AS |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 75 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Firehawk AS leads by 20
Why this score
| Source | Advantage T/A | Firehawk AS |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 67 | 50 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Firehawk AS leads by 59
Why this score
| Source | Advantage T/A | Firehawk AS |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 20 | 45 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Firehawk AS leads by 44
Why this score
| Source | Advantage T/A | Firehawk AS |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 50 | 75 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Firehawk AS leads by 17
Why this score
| Source | Advantage T/A | Firehawk AS |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 75 | 75 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Firehawk AS leads by 13
Why this score
| Source | Advantage T/A | Firehawk AS |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 57 | 70 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich Advantage T/A | Firestone Firehawk AS |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 61 | 87 |
| Dry | 80 | 94 |
| Wet | 67 | 87 |
| Snow | 20 | 79 |
| Comfort | 50 | 94 |
| Noise | – | 90 |
| Treadwear | 75 | 92 |
| Handling | 57 | 70 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
61
/ 100
Tire A
87
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The BFGoodrich Advantage T/A receives a polarized reception, with the user highlighting significant concerns regarding the consistency and predictability of the tire compound. While it may offer improved grip levels compared to certain entry-level alternatives, the lack of reliability across varying temperature ranges makes it a difficult recommendation for performance-oriented driving.
Pros
- Improved grip levels compared to baseline tires like the XM2
- Adequate stiffness in cold weather conditions
Cons
- Highly unpredictable compound performance
- Poor heat resistance leading to a 'mushy' feel in hot weather
- Lack of confidence-inspiring grip in cold and wet conditions
Observations
- The XL (Extra Load) variant does not mitigate the fundamental issues with the tire's compound construction.
The Firestone FireHawk AS is generally regarded as a high-value, sporty all-season tire that offers impressive dry grip and handling characteristics. While many users praise its longevity and aesthetic appeal, there is a notable divide regarding its wet-weather performance, with some users reporting significant concerns regarding hydroplaning.
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and durability
- Strong dry traction and cornering stability
- Attractive aesthetic design
- High value-to-price ratio
- Responsive steering feedback and sidewall stiffness
Cons
- Significant concerns regarding hydroplaning in heavy rain
- Potential for tread cracking after extended high-mileage use
- Availability issues at local retail outlets
Observations
- Owners of RWD performance vehicles like the Ford Mustang and Infiniti G35 report high satisfaction with cornering and handling.
- The tire demonstrates robust durability on high-torque FWD vehicles, effectively resisting belt shifting compared to other brands.
- Drivers of heavy, body-on-frame sedans appreciate the increased sidewall stiffness for improved steering feedback.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich Advantage T/A | B · Firestone Firehawk AS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | High Performance All Season tire | All Season High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 4 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 18″ |
| Tread depth | 10 - 12/32″ | 11/32″ |
| UTQG | 560 - 680 A A - B | 480 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 50,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | 44 psi |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
61
/ 100
BFGoodrich
87
/ 100
Firestone
Winner: Firestone Firehawk AS — better snow, comfort and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You drive through snowy winters
Firestone Firehawk AS scores 79 vs 20 on snow.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Firestone Firehawk AS scores 94 vs 50 on comfort.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Firestone Firehawk AS scores 87 vs 67 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Firestone Firehawk AS scores 92 vs 75 on treadwear.
Tire A · BFGoodrich Advantage T/A
Tire B · Firestone Firehawk AS
More comparisons
Also compared with
BFGoodrich Advantage T/A also compared with
Firestone Firehawk AS also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.