61
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
52/100
3 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
BFGoodrich Advantage T/A vs Michelin Defender T+H — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
89
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
82/100
Owner ratings
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Michelin Defender T+H — better snow, comfort and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Defender T+H leads by 14
Why this score
| Source | Advantage T/A | Defender T+H |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 92 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | – |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Defender T+H leads by 24
Why this score
| Source | Advantage T/A | Defender T+H |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 88 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 67 | – |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Defender T+H leads by 56
Why this score
| Source | Advantage T/A | Defender T+H |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 73 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 20 | – |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Defender T+H leads by 39
Why this score
| Source | Advantage T/A | Defender T+H |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 88 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 50 | – |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Defender T+H leads by 15
Why this score
| Source | Advantage T/A | Defender T+H |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 88 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 75 | – |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Defender T+H leads by 35
Why this score
| Source | Advantage T/A | Defender T+H |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 57 | – |
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich Advantage T/A | Michelin Defender T+H |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 61 | 89 |
| Dry | 80 | 94 |
| Wet | 67 | 91 |
| Snow | 20 | 76 |
| Comfort | 50 | 89 |
| Noise | – | 87 |
| Treadwear | 75 | 90 |
| Handling | 57 | 92 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
61
/ 100
Tire A
89
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The BFGoodrich Advantage T/A receives a polarized reception, with the user highlighting significant concerns regarding the consistency and predictability of the tire compound. While it may offer improved grip levels compared to certain entry-level alternatives, the lack of reliability across varying temperature ranges makes it a difficult recommendation for performance-oriented driving.
Pros
- Improved grip levels compared to baseline tires like the XM2
- Adequate stiffness in cold weather conditions
Cons
- Highly unpredictable compound performance
- Poor heat resistance leading to a 'mushy' feel in hot weather
- Lack of confidence-inspiring grip in cold and wet conditions
Observations
- The XL (Extra Load) variant does not mitigate the fundamental issues with the tire's compound construction.
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich Advantage T/A | B · Michelin Defender T+H |
|---|---|---|
| Category | High Performance All Season tire | Premium Touring All Season tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Tread depth | 10 - 12/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 560 - 680 A A - B | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
61
/ 100
BFGoodrich
89
/ 100
Michelin
Winner: Michelin Defender T+H — better snow, comfort and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You drive through snowy winters
Michelin Defender T+H scores 76 vs 20 on snow.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Michelin Defender T+H scores 89 vs 50 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Michelin Defender T+H scores 92 vs 57 on handling.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Michelin Defender T+H scores 91 vs 67 on wet.
Tire A · BFGoodrich Advantage T/A
Tire B · Michelin Defender T+H
More comparisons
Also compared with
BFGoodrich Advantage T/A also compared with
Michelin Defender T+H also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.