74
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
61/100
12 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Bridgestone Potenza RE050A Pole Position vs Bridgestone Potenza RE980AS — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
80
/ 100
Objective (60%)
69/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
85/100
556 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Bridgestone Potenza RE980AS — better treadwear, wet and dry. Pick the Bridgestone Potenza RE050A Pole Position if comfort and handling matter most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Potenza RE980AS leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | Potenza RE050A Pole Position | Potenza RE980AS |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 90 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 88 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 100 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Potenza RE980AS leads by 17
Why this score
| Source | Potenza RE050A Pole Position | Potenza RE980AS |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 92 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 75 | 76 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 100 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Potenza RE050A Pole Position | Potenza RE980AS |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 55 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 40 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Potenza RE050A Pole Position leads by 24
Why this score
| Source | Potenza RE050A Pole Position | Potenza RE980AS |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 23 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 56 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 100 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Potenza RE050A Pole Position | Potenza RE980AS |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleTire owners | – | 80 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Potenza RE980AS leads by 23
Why this score
| Source | Potenza RE050A Pole Position | Potenza RE980AS |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 65 | 63 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Potenza RE050A Pole Position leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | Potenza RE050A Pole Position | Potenza RE980AS |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 70 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Potenza RE050A Pole Position | Bridgestone Potenza RE980AS |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 74 | 80 |
| Dry | 88 | 91 |
| Wet | 74 | 91 |
| Snow | – | 63 |
| Comfort | 73 | 49 |
| Noise | – | 100 |
| Treadwear | 63 | 86 |
| Handling | 80 | 70 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
74
/ 100
Tire A
80
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Potenza RE050A Pole Position is widely regarded as a high-performance summer tire that excels in dry grip, handling, and steering responsiveness. While users consistently praise its predictable breakaway characteristics and value, the soft compound results in rapid tread wear, making it better suited for spirited driving than high-mileage daily commuting.
Pros
- Exceptional dry road grip and handling performance
- Predictable and progressive breakaway behavior
- Strong value proposition, particularly when found on clearance
- Improved wet weather performance compared to predecessor models
Cons
- Short tread life due to soft rubber compound
- Poor energy efficiency, making it unsuitable for electric vehicles
- Increased road noise compared to all-season alternatives
Observations
- Performance-oriented rear-wheel-drive vehicles like the Nissan 350Z/370Z and BMW models benefit significantly from the tire's grip and handling characteristics.
- Electric vehicle owners report significant efficiency penalties and increased noise, suggesting the tire is poorly optimized for EV range requirements.
The Bridgestone Potenza RE980AS (and its 'PLUS' iteration) is widely regarded as a high-value, ultra-high-performance all-season tire that excels in dry and wet road handling. While many users praise its quiet ride, responsiveness, and superior wet-weather traction compared to OEM tires, some enthusiasts find the sidewall stiffness lacking for aggressive track use, and a subset of users reports disappointing tread life.
Pros
- Excellent dry and wet road grip
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Strong value proposition compared to premium competitors
- Responsive steering and handling for daily spirited driving
Cons
- Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting premature wear
- Soft sidewalls perceived as 'sloppy' by some performance-oriented drivers
- Cold-weather flat-spotting that requires a few miles to round out
- Mediocre performance in deep snow or ice despite all-season classification
Observations
- Users with performance sedans and coupes (e.g., BMW, Audi, Mustang) generally appreciate the balance of comfort and grip, though some note it lacks the precision of dedicated summer tires.
- Tesla and EV owners report a noticeable reduction in range (approx. 5%) and a firmer ride, though many find the trade-off for improved handling and lower noise compared to OEM tires acceptable.
- Drivers of heavier or high-torque vehicles occasionally report faster-than-expected tread wear, particularly on staggered setups where rotation is not possible.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Potenza RE050A Pole Position | B · Bridgestone Potenza RE980AS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Max Performance tires | All Season Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 6 |
| Rim diameters | — | 17″ – 18″ |
| Tread depth | — | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 500 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 50,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
74
/ 100
Bridgestone
80
/ 100
Bridgestone
Winner: Bridgestone Potenza RE980AS — better treadwear, wet and dry. Pick the Bridgestone Potenza RE050A Pole Position if comfort and handling matter most to you.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Bridgestone Potenza RE050A Pole Position scores 73 vs 49 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Bridgestone Potenza RE980AS scores 86 vs 63 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Bridgestone Potenza RE980AS scores 91 vs 74 on wet.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Bridgestone Potenza RE050A Pole Position scores 80 vs 70 on handling.
Tire A · Bridgestone Potenza RE050A Pole Position
Tire B · Bridgestone Potenza RE980AS
More comparisons
Also compared with
Bridgestone Potenza RE050A Pole Position also compared with
Bridgestone Potenza RE980AS also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.